{"title":"分支高阶统一","authors":"J. Goubault-Larrecq","doi":"10.1109/LICS.1997.614966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While unification in the simple theory of types (a.k.a. higher-order logic) is undecidable. we show that unification in the pure ramified theory of types with integer levels is decidable. Since pure ramified type theory is not very expressive, we examine the impure case, which has an undecidable unification problem already at order 2. In impure ramified higher-order logics, expressive predicative second-order subsystems of arithmetic or of inductive theories have concise axiomatisations; because of this and our decidability result for the pure case, we argue that ramified systems are expressive higher-order frameworks in which automated proof search should be practical.","PeriodicalId":272903,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Twelfth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","volume":"40 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ramified higher-order unification\",\"authors\":\"J. Goubault-Larrecq\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LICS.1997.614966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While unification in the simple theory of types (a.k.a. higher-order logic) is undecidable. we show that unification in the pure ramified theory of types with integer levels is decidable. Since pure ramified type theory is not very expressive, we examine the impure case, which has an undecidable unification problem already at order 2. In impure ramified higher-order logics, expressive predicative second-order subsystems of arithmetic or of inductive theories have concise axiomatisations; because of this and our decidability result for the pure case, we argue that ramified systems are expressive higher-order frameworks in which automated proof search should be practical.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of Twelfth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"40 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of Twelfth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.1997.614966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Twelfth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.1997.614966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

而简单类型理论(即高阶逻辑)的统一是不可确定的。我们证明了整级类型的纯分支理论的统一是可决定的。由于纯粹的分支类型理论不是很有表现力,我们研究了不纯粹的情况,它已经在2阶具有不可判定的统一问题。在非纯分支高阶逻辑中,算术或归纳理论的表达性谓词二阶子系统具有简洁的公理化;由于这一点和我们对纯粹情况的可判定性结果,我们认为分支系统是表达性高阶框架,其中自动证明搜索应该是实用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ramified higher-order unification
While unification in the simple theory of types (a.k.a. higher-order logic) is undecidable. we show that unification in the pure ramified theory of types with integer levels is decidable. Since pure ramified type theory is not very expressive, we examine the impure case, which has an undecidable unification problem already at order 2. In impure ramified higher-order logics, expressive predicative second-order subsystems of arithmetic or of inductive theories have concise axiomatisations; because of this and our decidability result for the pure case, we argue that ramified systems are expressive higher-order frameworks in which automated proof search should be practical.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Believe it or not, AJM's games model is a model of classical linear logic Discrimination by parallel observers Semantics of exact real arithmetic Unique fixpoint induction for value-passing processes The monadic quantifier alternation hierarchy over graphs is infinite
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1