内部和外部恶意流量的比较

M. Cukier, S. Panjwani
{"title":"内部和外部恶意流量的比较","authors":"M. Cukier, S. Panjwani","doi":"10.1109/ISSRE.2007.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper empirically compares malicious traffic originating inside an organization (i.e., internal traffic) with malicious traffic originating outside an organization (i.e., external traffic). Two honeypot target computers were deployed to collect malicious traffic data over a period of fifteen weeks. In the first study we showed that there was a weak correlation between internal and external traffic based on the number of malicious connections. Since the type of malicious activity is linked to the port that was targeted, we focused on the most frequently targeted ports. We observed that internal malicious traffic often contained different malicious content compared to that of external traffic. In the third study, we discovered that the volume of malicious traffic was linked to the day of the week. We showed that internal and external malicious activities differ: where the external malicious activity is quite stable over the week, the internal traffic varied as a function of the users' activity profile.","PeriodicalId":193805,"journal":{"name":"The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability (ISSRE '07)","volume":"14 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison between Internal and External Malicious Traffic\",\"authors\":\"M. Cukier, S. Panjwani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSRE.2007.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper empirically compares malicious traffic originating inside an organization (i.e., internal traffic) with malicious traffic originating outside an organization (i.e., external traffic). Two honeypot target computers were deployed to collect malicious traffic data over a period of fifteen weeks. In the first study we showed that there was a weak correlation between internal and external traffic based on the number of malicious connections. Since the type of malicious activity is linked to the port that was targeted, we focused on the most frequently targeted ports. We observed that internal malicious traffic often contained different malicious content compared to that of external traffic. In the third study, we discovered that the volume of malicious traffic was linked to the day of the week. We showed that internal and external malicious activities differ: where the external malicious activity is quite stable over the week, the internal traffic varied as a function of the users' activity profile.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability (ISSRE '07)\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability (ISSRE '07)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE.2007.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability (ISSRE '07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE.2007.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文对来自组织内部的恶意流量(即内部流量)和来自组织外部的恶意流量(即外部流量)进行了实证比较。在15周的时间里,部署了两台蜜罐目标计算机来收集恶意流量数据。在第一项研究中,我们发现基于恶意连接的数量,内部和外部流量之间存在弱相关性。由于恶意活动的类型与目标端口相关联,因此我们将重点放在最常见的目标端口上。我们观察到,内部恶意流量通常包含与外部流量不同的恶意内容。在第三项研究中,我们发现恶意流量的数量与一周中的某一天有关。我们展示了内部和外部恶意活动的不同:外部恶意活动在一周内相当稳定,内部流量随着用户活动概况的变化而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison between Internal and External Malicious Traffic
This paper empirically compares malicious traffic originating inside an organization (i.e., internal traffic) with malicious traffic originating outside an organization (i.e., external traffic). Two honeypot target computers were deployed to collect malicious traffic data over a period of fifteen weeks. In the first study we showed that there was a weak correlation between internal and external traffic based on the number of malicious connections. Since the type of malicious activity is linked to the port that was targeted, we focused on the most frequently targeted ports. We observed that internal malicious traffic often contained different malicious content compared to that of external traffic. In the third study, we discovered that the volume of malicious traffic was linked to the day of the week. We showed that internal and external malicious activities differ: where the external malicious activity is quite stable over the week, the internal traffic varied as a function of the users' activity profile.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-parametric Predictive Inference of Preventive Rejuvenation Schedule in Operational Software Systems Predicting Subsystem Failures using Dependency Graph Complexities Integrated Software Vulnerability and Security Functionality Assessment Correlations between Internal Software Metrics and Software Dependability in a Large Population of Small C/C++ Programs On the Impact of Injection Triggers for OS Robustness Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1