混合TCP拥塞控制中rtt公平性的改进

Kazumine Ogura, Tomoki Fujikawa, Su Zhou, J. Katto
{"title":"混合TCP拥塞控制中rtt公平性的改进","authors":"Kazumine Ogura, Tomoki Fujikawa, Su Zhou, J. Katto","doi":"10.1109/CQR.2009.5137351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents TCP-Fusion supporting RTT (Round Trip Time) fairness in addition to throughput efficiency and friendliness to TCP-Reno. When multiple TCP flows having different RTT values compete, more bandwidth is unfairly allocated to the flow having smaller RTT. This means that a user with longer RTT may not be able to obtain sufficient bandwidth by the current methods. On the other hand, recent studies on the TCP congestion control to achieve RTT fairness and throughput efficiency are evolving actively. An example for RTT fairness is TCP-Libra and an example for throughput efficiency is Hybrid TCP congestion control. This paper focuses on Hybrid TCP (exploiting residual link capacity when TCP-Reno drops its rate) and improves its RTT fairness by incorporating the ideas of TCP-Libra (congestion window increase in proportion to square of RTT) to its loss mode. Experiments are carried out to validate the proposed method and much better performances in RTT fairness and throughput are provided against conventional methods.","PeriodicalId":186033,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Workshop Technical Committee on Communications Quality and Reliability","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement of RTT-fairness in Hybrid TCP congestion control\",\"authors\":\"Kazumine Ogura, Tomoki Fujikawa, Su Zhou, J. Katto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CQR.2009.5137351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents TCP-Fusion supporting RTT (Round Trip Time) fairness in addition to throughput efficiency and friendliness to TCP-Reno. When multiple TCP flows having different RTT values compete, more bandwidth is unfairly allocated to the flow having smaller RTT. This means that a user with longer RTT may not be able to obtain sufficient bandwidth by the current methods. On the other hand, recent studies on the TCP congestion control to achieve RTT fairness and throughput efficiency are evolving actively. An example for RTT fairness is TCP-Libra and an example for throughput efficiency is Hybrid TCP congestion control. This paper focuses on Hybrid TCP (exploiting residual link capacity when TCP-Reno drops its rate) and improves its RTT fairness by incorporating the ideas of TCP-Libra (congestion window increase in proportion to square of RTT) to its loss mode. Experiments are carried out to validate the proposed method and much better performances in RTT fairness and throughput are provided against conventional methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE International Workshop Technical Committee on Communications Quality and Reliability\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE International Workshop Technical Committee on Communications Quality and Reliability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CQR.2009.5137351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Workshop Technical Committee on Communications Quality and Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CQR.2009.5137351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文提出了支持RTT(往返时间)公平性的TCP-Fusion,以及吞吐量效率和对TCP-Reno的友好性。当具有不同RTT值的多个TCP流竞争时,更多的带宽被不公平地分配给具有较小RTT的流。这意味着具有较长RTT的用户可能无法通过当前方法获得足够的带宽。另一方面,近年来对TCP拥塞控制以实现RTT公平性和吞吐量效率的研究也在积极发展。RTT公平性的一个例子是TCP- libra,吞吐量效率的一个例子是Hybrid TCP拥塞控制。本文主要研究混合TCP(利用TCP- reno降低其速率时的剩余链路容量),并通过将TCP- libra(拥塞窗口与RTT的平方成比例增加)的思想纳入其损失模式来提高其RTT公平性。实验结果表明,该方法在RTT公平性和吞吐量方面都优于传统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improvement of RTT-fairness in Hybrid TCP congestion control
This paper presents TCP-Fusion supporting RTT (Round Trip Time) fairness in addition to throughput efficiency and friendliness to TCP-Reno. When multiple TCP flows having different RTT values compete, more bandwidth is unfairly allocated to the flow having smaller RTT. This means that a user with longer RTT may not be able to obtain sufficient bandwidth by the current methods. On the other hand, recent studies on the TCP congestion control to achieve RTT fairness and throughput efficiency are evolving actively. An example for RTT fairness is TCP-Libra and an example for throughput efficiency is Hybrid TCP congestion control. This paper focuses on Hybrid TCP (exploiting residual link capacity when TCP-Reno drops its rate) and improves its RTT fairness by incorporating the ideas of TCP-Libra (congestion window increase in proportion to square of RTT) to its loss mode. Experiments are carried out to validate the proposed method and much better performances in RTT fairness and throughput are provided against conventional methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intentional window flow control for proxy-based TCP in ad hoc networks Proof of optimal algorithm for maximum-bandwidth ALM tree construction An exact optimization tool for market-oriented grid middleware Quantifying software reliability and readiness Computational quality model for wideband voice-over-IP communications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1