团队中的相互监督和团队成员沟通

M. Arnold, R. Hannan, Ivo D. Tafkov
{"title":"团队中的相互监督和团队成员沟通","authors":"M. Arnold, R. Hannan, Ivo D. Tafkov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2823346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates whether the benefit firms can extract from team member communication to the team manager—who may use such information for rewarding individual team members—is affected by differences in the type of mutual monitoring information available to team members. We predict and find that team performance is higher when team members can observe only each other's effort than when they can observe both each other's effort and output levels; conversely, team performance is lower when team members can observe only each other's output than when they can observe both each other's effort and output levels. The intuition behind these results is that the type of observable mutual monitoring information creates different degrees of ambiguity regarding what should be considered a fair reward allocation for team members' contributions. Such ambiguity reduces the usefulness of team member communication to the manager for allocating rewards, resulting in lower team performance.Data Availability: Data are available from the authors upon request.","PeriodicalId":287526,"journal":{"name":"AAA 2017 Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting (Archive)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mutual Monitoring and Team Member Communication in Teams\",\"authors\":\"M. Arnold, R. Hannan, Ivo D. Tafkov\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2823346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates whether the benefit firms can extract from team member communication to the team manager—who may use such information for rewarding individual team members—is affected by differences in the type of mutual monitoring information available to team members. We predict and find that team performance is higher when team members can observe only each other's effort than when they can observe both each other's effort and output levels; conversely, team performance is lower when team members can observe only each other's output than when they can observe both each other's effort and output levels. The intuition behind these results is that the type of observable mutual monitoring information creates different degrees of ambiguity regarding what should be considered a fair reward allocation for team members' contributions. Such ambiguity reduces the usefulness of team member communication to the manager for allocating rewards, resulting in lower team performance.Data Availability: Data are available from the authors upon request.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAA 2017 Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting (Archive)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAA 2017 Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting (Archive)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2823346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAA 2017 Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2823346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本研究调查了公司能否从团队成员与团队经理的沟通中获取利益——团队经理可能会使用这些信息来奖励团队成员——受到团队成员可获得的相互监控信息类型差异的影响。我们预测并发现,当团队成员只能观察到彼此的努力水平时,团队绩效比同时观察到彼此的努力和产出水平时更高;相反,当团队成员只能观察到彼此的产出水平时,团队绩效会比同时观察到彼此的努力和产出水平时低。这些结果背后的直觉是,可观察到的相互监视信息的类型在团队成员贡献的公平奖励分配方面产生了不同程度的模糊性。这种模糊性降低了团队成员与管理者沟通分配奖励的有效性,导致团队绩效降低。数据可用性:数据可根据要求从作者处获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mutual Monitoring and Team Member Communication in Teams
This study investigates whether the benefit firms can extract from team member communication to the team manager—who may use such information for rewarding individual team members—is affected by differences in the type of mutual monitoring information available to team members. We predict and find that team performance is higher when team members can observe only each other's effort than when they can observe both each other's effort and output levels; conversely, team performance is lower when team members can observe only each other's output than when they can observe both each other's effort and output levels. The intuition behind these results is that the type of observable mutual monitoring information creates different degrees of ambiguity regarding what should be considered a fair reward allocation for team members' contributions. Such ambiguity reduces the usefulness of team member communication to the manager for allocating rewards, resulting in lower team performance.Data Availability: Data are available from the authors upon request.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leader Effects in Competition Among Teams: Evidence from a Field Intervention Assigned versus Chosen Relative Performance Information: The Effect of Feedback Frequency on Performance Do First Impressions Last? The Impact of Initial Assessments and Subsequent Performance on Promotion Decisions Adoption of Accounting Information System Practices by Entrepreneurs in Sri Lanka (with Special Reference to Polonnaruwa District) The Effect of Supervisors’ Prior Task Performance on Employees’ Targets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1