共同基础设施建设成本分担中的渐进式比例

Izabela Heppner, Radosław Rudek
{"title":"共同基础设施建设成本分担中的渐进式比例","authors":"Izabela Heppner, Radosław Rudek","doi":"10.33422/bmeconf.2019.12.907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of a fair distribution is considered in relation to many areas and phenomena. As one of the oldest social problems, many methods of division have been proposed over the years. The most deeply rooted in the theory of justice are proportional divisions. However, they may be perceived as unfair for some practical cases. Let us consider a cost sharing of a natural gas infrastructure development. The main part of the cost is covered by an investor, whereas the rest, i.e. the total connection fee, has to be paid by customers willing to be connected to the pipeline. Since the revenue comes from consumption fees, therefore, the investment can start if the total expected gas consumption volume reaches a certain limit. If the total connection fee is divided proportionally among the customers based on their consumption volumes, then some of them will suffer from financial burden. On the other hand, connection fees of customers with small consumption will be marginal, but they will also use the common infrastructure. To prevent such cost sharing, which can be perceived as unfair, we will use the degressive proportionality principle. However, its practical application to determine a solution requires additional criteria and algorithms. We propose a cost sharing method derived from mathematical programming which optimizes a cost criterion based on a proportional distribution at the same time holding degressively proportional principle. Our proposal can be a compromise between different concepts of justice used in the cost sharing of a common infrastructure development.","PeriodicalId":326395,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Applied Research in Business, Management and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digressive Proportionality in a Cost Sharing of a Common Infrastructure Development\",\"authors\":\"Izabela Heppner, Radosław Rudek\",\"doi\":\"10.33422/bmeconf.2019.12.907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of a fair distribution is considered in relation to many areas and phenomena. As one of the oldest social problems, many methods of division have been proposed over the years. The most deeply rooted in the theory of justice are proportional divisions. However, they may be perceived as unfair for some practical cases. Let us consider a cost sharing of a natural gas infrastructure development. The main part of the cost is covered by an investor, whereas the rest, i.e. the total connection fee, has to be paid by customers willing to be connected to the pipeline. Since the revenue comes from consumption fees, therefore, the investment can start if the total expected gas consumption volume reaches a certain limit. If the total connection fee is divided proportionally among the customers based on their consumption volumes, then some of them will suffer from financial burden. On the other hand, connection fees of customers with small consumption will be marginal, but they will also use the common infrastructure. To prevent such cost sharing, which can be perceived as unfair, we will use the degressive proportionality principle. However, its practical application to determine a solution requires additional criteria and algorithms. We propose a cost sharing method derived from mathematical programming which optimizes a cost criterion based on a proportional distribution at the same time holding degressively proportional principle. Our proposal can be a compromise between different concepts of justice used in the cost sharing of a common infrastructure development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of The International Conference on Applied Research in Business, Management and Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of The International Conference on Applied Research in Business, Management and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33422/bmeconf.2019.12.907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Applied Research in Business, Management and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/bmeconf.2019.12.907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公平分配的问题被认为与许多领域和现象有关。作为最古老的社会问题之一,多年来人们提出了许多划分方法。在正义理论中最根深蒂固的是按比例划分。然而,在一些实际情况下,它们可能被认为是不公平的。让我们考虑天然气基础设施开发的成本分摊。成本的主要部分由投资者支付,而其余部分,即总连接费,必须由愿意连接到管道的客户支付。由于收入来源于消费费用,因此,当总预期用气量达到一定限度时,可以开始投资。如果总接入费是根据用户的消费量按比例分配的,那么一部分用户就会承受经济负担。另一方面,小消费客户的连接费用将是边际的,但他们也会使用共同的基础设施。为了防止这种可能被视为不公平的成本分摊,我们将使用递减比例原则。然而,它的实际应用,以确定一个解决方案需要额外的标准和算法。本文提出了一种基于数学规划的成本分担方法,该方法基于比例分布优化成本准则,同时遵循逐步比例原则。我们的建议可以是在共同基础设施发展的费用分摊中使用的不同正义概念之间的妥协。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digressive Proportionality in a Cost Sharing of a Common Infrastructure Development
The problem of a fair distribution is considered in relation to many areas and phenomena. As one of the oldest social problems, many methods of division have been proposed over the years. The most deeply rooted in the theory of justice are proportional divisions. However, they may be perceived as unfair for some practical cases. Let us consider a cost sharing of a natural gas infrastructure development. The main part of the cost is covered by an investor, whereas the rest, i.e. the total connection fee, has to be paid by customers willing to be connected to the pipeline. Since the revenue comes from consumption fees, therefore, the investment can start if the total expected gas consumption volume reaches a certain limit. If the total connection fee is divided proportionally among the customers based on their consumption volumes, then some of them will suffer from financial burden. On the other hand, connection fees of customers with small consumption will be marginal, but they will also use the common infrastructure. To prevent such cost sharing, which can be perceived as unfair, we will use the degressive proportionality principle. However, its practical application to determine a solution requires additional criteria and algorithms. We propose a cost sharing method derived from mathematical programming which optimizes a cost criterion based on a proportional distribution at the same time holding degressively proportional principle. Our proposal can be a compromise between different concepts of justice used in the cost sharing of a common infrastructure development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Importance of Applying the Value Chain Analysis in the Higher Education System Integrated Territorial Investments as a Tool for Regional Development – Polish Experience Impact of Economic Factors on Decision Making Power of Rural Nepalese Women Entrepreneurs Staff turnover as a kind of personnel risk in hotel enterprises in Poland Entropy of Tourism: the unseen side of tourism accommodation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1