地下知识:通过实验拍卖估计土壤信息转移的影响

David M. A. Murphy, D. Roobroeck, David R. Lee, J. Thies
{"title":"地下知识:通过实验拍卖估计土壤信息转移的影响","authors":"David M. A. Murphy, D. Roobroeck, David R. Lee, J. Thies","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3493308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil degradation, a serious environmental problem in many developing countries, often necessitates the use of fertilizers to improve crop yields. However, smallholders usually do not have sufficient information about their soil nutrient levels to make profit-maximizing decisions about fertilizer usage. We conducted two-round experimental auctions to determine whether providing information and fertilizer recommendations from inexpensive soil testing kits to farmers in western Kenya affected their behavior and ability to optimize their input choices. We auctioned organic and inorganic agricultural inputs, dividing farmers into information treatments, and analyzed the data using double and triple difference estimations. We find that providing soil information has significant effects on farmers’ willingness to pay for inputs. We then use Monte Carlo simulations to show that there is potential for high net benefits to farmers from individualized soil tests. These results suggest that soil testing can be a cost-effective method to increase food security in the region.","PeriodicalId":159262,"journal":{"name":"EcoRN: Soil Ecology (Topic)","volume":" 24","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Underground Knowledge: Estimating the Impacts of Soil Information Transfers through Experimental Auctions\",\"authors\":\"David M. A. Murphy, D. Roobroeck, David R. Lee, J. Thies\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3493308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil degradation, a serious environmental problem in many developing countries, often necessitates the use of fertilizers to improve crop yields. However, smallholders usually do not have sufficient information about their soil nutrient levels to make profit-maximizing decisions about fertilizer usage. We conducted two-round experimental auctions to determine whether providing information and fertilizer recommendations from inexpensive soil testing kits to farmers in western Kenya affected their behavior and ability to optimize their input choices. We auctioned organic and inorganic agricultural inputs, dividing farmers into information treatments, and analyzed the data using double and triple difference estimations. We find that providing soil information has significant effects on farmers’ willingness to pay for inputs. We then use Monte Carlo simulations to show that there is potential for high net benefits to farmers from individualized soil tests. These results suggest that soil testing can be a cost-effective method to increase food security in the region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EcoRN: Soil Ecology (Topic)\",\"volume\":\" 24\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EcoRN: Soil Ecology (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3493308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EcoRN: Soil Ecology (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3493308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

土壤退化是许多发展中国家的一个严重环境问题,往往需要使用肥料来提高作物产量。然而,小农通常没有足够的关于土壤养分水平的信息,无法就肥料使用做出利润最大化的决定。我们进行了两轮试验拍卖,以确定向肯尼亚西部农民提供廉价土壤检测试剂盒的信息和肥料建议是否会影响他们的行为和优化投入选择的能力。我们拍卖了有机和无机农业投入,将农民划分为信息处理,并使用双差分和三差分估计对数据进行分析。我们发现,提供土壤信息对农民支付投入的意愿有显著影响。然后,我们使用蒙特卡罗模拟来显示个性化土壤测试对农民具有高净效益的潜力。这些结果表明,土壤测试可以成为提高该地区粮食安全的一种具有成本效益的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Underground Knowledge: Estimating the Impacts of Soil Information Transfers through Experimental Auctions
Soil degradation, a serious environmental problem in many developing countries, often necessitates the use of fertilizers to improve crop yields. However, smallholders usually do not have sufficient information about their soil nutrient levels to make profit-maximizing decisions about fertilizer usage. We conducted two-round experimental auctions to determine whether providing information and fertilizer recommendations from inexpensive soil testing kits to farmers in western Kenya affected their behavior and ability to optimize their input choices. We auctioned organic and inorganic agricultural inputs, dividing farmers into information treatments, and analyzed the data using double and triple difference estimations. We find that providing soil information has significant effects on farmers’ willingness to pay for inputs. We then use Monte Carlo simulations to show that there is potential for high net benefits to farmers from individualized soil tests. These results suggest that soil testing can be a cost-effective method to increase food security in the region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Underground Knowledge: Estimating the Impacts of Soil Information Transfers through Experimental Auctions A Review of Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil by Industrial Waste Materials A Review on Comparative Study of Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil by Natural and Artificial Fibre Misperceived Quality: Fertilizer in Tanzania Organic Compost as Catalyst or Mediator for Speedy and Cost Effective Bioremediation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1