分析judis分析了在印尼有限责任机构成立中,资本法定代表书取代资本法定代表人证据的地位

D. Oktavia, Irene Svinarky
{"title":"分析judis分析了在印尼有限责任机构成立中,资本法定代表书取代资本法定代表人证据的地位","authors":"D. Oktavia, Irene Svinarky","doi":"10.31849/jgh.v3i01.7504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa pada Pasal 32 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas disebutkan bahwa modal dasar pendirian Perseroan Terbatas paling sedikit berjumlah Rp50.000.000,. Namun jumlah tersebut menyulitkan bagi pelaku Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM), khususnya usaha mikro. Oleh karena itu, dalam Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 kemudian mempermudah pendirian Perseroan Terbatas dengan pendiri hanya membuat Surat Pernyataan Telah Menyetor Modal tanpa harus menyetorkan modalnya. Mengingat penyetoran modal pendirian Perseroan Terbatas merupakan kewajiban yang mutlak yang harus dipenuhi oleh siapapun yang telah menyetujui penempatan modalnya pada Perseroan Terbatas dalam suatu dokumen resmi, baik yang dilakukan sebelum maupun setelah Perseroan Terbatas berdiri dan memperoleh status sebagai badan hukum, maka ketiadaan penyetoran modal pada saat yang telah ditentukan dapat melahirkan perikatan utang-piutang antara Perseroan Terbatas sebagai kreditur dengan pemegang saham sebagai debitur. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. \nAbstract \nThis research explain that Article 32 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies states that the authorized capital for the establishment of a Limited Liability Company is at least IDR 50,000,000,. However this number makes it difficult for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), especially micro businesses. Therefore, in the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 4 of 2014 then it makes it easier for the establishment of a Limited Liability Company with the founders only to make a Statement of Having Paid Capital without having to deposit their capital. Considering that the payment of capital for the establishment of a Limited Liability Company is an absolute obligation that must be fulfilled by anyone who has approved the placement of their capital in a Limited Liability Company in an official document, either before or after the Limited Liability Company has been established and obtained its status as a legal entity, there is no capital injection at the time. which has been determined can give birth to a debt-receivable agreement between the Limited Liability Company as a creditor and the shareholders as the debtor. . The method used in this research is normative legal research.","PeriodicalId":198081,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Gagasan Hukum","volume":"171 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS YURIDIS KEDUDUKAN SURAT PERNYATAAN SETOR MODAL SEBAGAI PENGGANTI BUKTI SETOR MODAL DALAM PENDIRIAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS DI INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"D. Oktavia, Irene Svinarky\",\"doi\":\"10.31849/jgh.v3i01.7504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa pada Pasal 32 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas disebutkan bahwa modal dasar pendirian Perseroan Terbatas paling sedikit berjumlah Rp50.000.000,. Namun jumlah tersebut menyulitkan bagi pelaku Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM), khususnya usaha mikro. Oleh karena itu, dalam Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 kemudian mempermudah pendirian Perseroan Terbatas dengan pendiri hanya membuat Surat Pernyataan Telah Menyetor Modal tanpa harus menyetorkan modalnya. Mengingat penyetoran modal pendirian Perseroan Terbatas merupakan kewajiban yang mutlak yang harus dipenuhi oleh siapapun yang telah menyetujui penempatan modalnya pada Perseroan Terbatas dalam suatu dokumen resmi, baik yang dilakukan sebelum maupun setelah Perseroan Terbatas berdiri dan memperoleh status sebagai badan hukum, maka ketiadaan penyetoran modal pada saat yang telah ditentukan dapat melahirkan perikatan utang-piutang antara Perseroan Terbatas sebagai kreditur dengan pemegang saham sebagai debitur. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. \\nAbstract \\nThis research explain that Article 32 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies states that the authorized capital for the establishment of a Limited Liability Company is at least IDR 50,000,000,. However this number makes it difficult for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), especially micro businesses. Therefore, in the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 4 of 2014 then it makes it easier for the establishment of a Limited Liability Company with the founders only to make a Statement of Having Paid Capital without having to deposit their capital. Considering that the payment of capital for the establishment of a Limited Liability Company is an absolute obligation that must be fulfilled by anyone who has approved the placement of their capital in a Limited Liability Company in an official document, either before or after the Limited Liability Company has been established and obtained its status as a legal entity, there is no capital injection at the time. which has been determined can give birth to a debt-receivable agreement between the Limited Liability Company as a creditor and the shareholders as the debtor. . The method used in this research is normative legal research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Gagasan Hukum\",\"volume\":\"171 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Gagasan Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v3i01.7504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Gagasan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v3i01.7504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项研究解释说,2007年第32节(1)关于有限责任条例的第40条提到了最低限度的自由责任资本。但对于中小型、小型和中型企业(UMKM)来说,这是一个很大的挑战,尤其是小规模企业。因此,2014年4月4日,在《司法部长法与人权》(law department of law)的规定下,与开国元勋(创建者)达成有限的自由裁量权,而不需要提交资金就能获得资本。因此,有限责任公司的资本存款是一项绝对的义务,任何同意将其资金存在于一份官方文件中的人,无论在这项法律文件之前还是之后,都必须履行这种义务。因此,在规定的时间内没有资本存款可能会在债权人和股东成为债务人之间产生有限利息。本研究采用的方法是规范法的研究。这项研究的解释是,这篇文章的第32条。依赖这些数字使微企业、小企业和媒介企业(MSMEs)更难,尤其是微型企业。因此,在2014年《法律与人权部长》(Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 4)的规定下,这使它更容易建立一个有限的公司,与创立者建立一个不涉及资本存款的声明。考虑到那个体制》《capital . payment for a有限责任公司绝对是一个抵押那一定能实现配置》由谁已经同意了他们的capital in a有限责任公司in an官方文件,不管之前或之后有限责任公司已经建立和获得它的美国合法的实体的地位,没有capital injection is at the time)。被认为是理所当然的,这可以在有限的公司作为推销商和客户作为债务人之间产生一种可接受的共识。这项研究使用的方法是合理的法律研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALISIS YURIDIS KEDUDUKAN SURAT PERNYATAAN SETOR MODAL SEBAGAI PENGGANTI BUKTI SETOR MODAL DALAM PENDIRIAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS DI INDONESIA
Penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa pada Pasal 32 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas disebutkan bahwa modal dasar pendirian Perseroan Terbatas paling sedikit berjumlah Rp50.000.000,. Namun jumlah tersebut menyulitkan bagi pelaku Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM), khususnya usaha mikro. Oleh karena itu, dalam Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 kemudian mempermudah pendirian Perseroan Terbatas dengan pendiri hanya membuat Surat Pernyataan Telah Menyetor Modal tanpa harus menyetorkan modalnya. Mengingat penyetoran modal pendirian Perseroan Terbatas merupakan kewajiban yang mutlak yang harus dipenuhi oleh siapapun yang telah menyetujui penempatan modalnya pada Perseroan Terbatas dalam suatu dokumen resmi, baik yang dilakukan sebelum maupun setelah Perseroan Terbatas berdiri dan memperoleh status sebagai badan hukum, maka ketiadaan penyetoran modal pada saat yang telah ditentukan dapat melahirkan perikatan utang-piutang antara Perseroan Terbatas sebagai kreditur dengan pemegang saham sebagai debitur. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Abstract This research explain that Article 32 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies states that the authorized capital for the establishment of a Limited Liability Company is at least IDR 50,000,000,. However this number makes it difficult for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), especially micro businesses. Therefore, in the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 4 of 2014 then it makes it easier for the establishment of a Limited Liability Company with the founders only to make a Statement of Having Paid Capital without having to deposit their capital. Considering that the payment of capital for the establishment of a Limited Liability Company is an absolute obligation that must be fulfilled by anyone who has approved the placement of their capital in a Limited Liability Company in an official document, either before or after the Limited Liability Company has been established and obtained its status as a legal entity, there is no capital injection at the time. which has been determined can give birth to a debt-receivable agreement between the Limited Liability Company as a creditor and the shareholders as the debtor. . The method used in this research is normative legal research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Copyright And Music And Song Art Works In The Digital Era Legal Security Of Land Ownership By The System Law In Indonesia And Judicia Practice Optimizing The Role Of The State Administrative Court In Assessing Elements Of Abuse of Authority Based on Law No. 30 of 2014 jo. Supreme Courts No. 4 of 2015 Criminological Analysis of Criminal Actions Motor Vehicle Theft Based Victimological Perspective (Decision Number: 168/Pid.B/2022/PN.Kla) The Contradiction Of Diversion Become An Option For Handling And Resolving Cases Against Children Who Complete Criminal Actions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1