{"title":"保证服务流的聚合","authors":"J. Schmitt, M. Karsten, Lior Wolf, R. Steinmetz","doi":"10.1109/IWQOS.1999.766489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is common belief that the integrated services architecture (IntServ) is not scalable to large networks as, e.g., the global Internet. This is due to the ambitious goal of providing per-flow QoS and the resulting complexity of fine-grained traffic management. One solution to this problem is the aggregation of IntServ traffic flows in the core of the network. While one might suspect that aggregation leads to allocating more resources for the aggregated flow than for the sum of the separated flows if flow isolation is to be guaranteed, we show in this paper that for IntServ's guaranteed service flows this is not necessarily the case even if flow isolation is retained. We compare different approaches to describing the aggregated traffic and analyze their impact on bandwidth consumption and ease of flow management. Applications of these theoretical insights could be to use the derived formulas for resource allocation in either a hierarchical RSVP/IntServ, IntServ over DiffServ (differentiated services), or IntServ over ATM network.","PeriodicalId":435117,"journal":{"name":"1999 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Service. IWQoS'99. (Cat. No.98EX354)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aggregation of guaranteed service flows\",\"authors\":\"J. Schmitt, M. Karsten, Lior Wolf, R. Steinmetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWQOS.1999.766489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is common belief that the integrated services architecture (IntServ) is not scalable to large networks as, e.g., the global Internet. This is due to the ambitious goal of providing per-flow QoS and the resulting complexity of fine-grained traffic management. One solution to this problem is the aggregation of IntServ traffic flows in the core of the network. While one might suspect that aggregation leads to allocating more resources for the aggregated flow than for the sum of the separated flows if flow isolation is to be guaranteed, we show in this paper that for IntServ's guaranteed service flows this is not necessarily the case even if flow isolation is retained. We compare different approaches to describing the aggregated traffic and analyze their impact on bandwidth consumption and ease of flow management. Applications of these theoretical insights could be to use the derived formulas for resource allocation in either a hierarchical RSVP/IntServ, IntServ over DiffServ (differentiated services), or IntServ over ATM network.\",\"PeriodicalId\":435117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1999 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Service. IWQoS'99. (Cat. No.98EX354)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1999 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Service. IWQoS'99. (Cat. No.98EX354)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWQOS.1999.766489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1999 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Service. IWQoS'99. (Cat. No.98EX354)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWQOS.1999.766489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33
摘要
人们普遍认为,集成服务体系结构(IntServ)不能扩展到像全球Internet这样的大型网络。这是由于提供每个流QoS的宏伟目标以及由此产生的细粒度流量管理的复杂性。这个问题的一个解决方案是在网络的核心聚合IntServ流量流。虽然有人可能会怀疑,如果要保证流隔离,聚合导致为聚合流分配的资源多于为分离流分配的资源总和,但我们在本文中表明,对于IntServ的保证服务流,即使保留流隔离,情况也不一定如此。我们比较了描述聚合流量的不同方法,并分析了它们对带宽消耗和流量管理便利性的影响。这些理论见解的应用可以在分层RSVP/IntServ、IntServ over DiffServ(差异化服务)或IntServ over ATM网络中使用派生公式进行资源分配。
It is common belief that the integrated services architecture (IntServ) is not scalable to large networks as, e.g., the global Internet. This is due to the ambitious goal of providing per-flow QoS and the resulting complexity of fine-grained traffic management. One solution to this problem is the aggregation of IntServ traffic flows in the core of the network. While one might suspect that aggregation leads to allocating more resources for the aggregated flow than for the sum of the separated flows if flow isolation is to be guaranteed, we show in this paper that for IntServ's guaranteed service flows this is not necessarily the case even if flow isolation is retained. We compare different approaches to describing the aggregated traffic and analyze their impact on bandwidth consumption and ease of flow management. Applications of these theoretical insights could be to use the derived formulas for resource allocation in either a hierarchical RSVP/IntServ, IntServ over DiffServ (differentiated services), or IntServ over ATM network.