{"title":"情景记忆:N-back任务","authors":"A. Beukers, K. Norman, J. Cohen","doi":"10.32470/ccn.2019.1311-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a model of how working memory (WM) and episodic memory (EM) interact in the n-back task. Contrary to previous models in which information is actively maintained in WM, our model posits that information about previous stimuli is retained exclusively in EM. Unlike WM-based active maintenance, which has limited maintenance capacity, EM-based storage has unlimited storage capacity but is subject to proactive interference. Using the model we show that benchmark phenomena ordinarily attributed to use of a limited-capacity WM system (the set size effect and the lure interference effect) can also arise in a model with no such maintenance constraints.","PeriodicalId":281121,"journal":{"name":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working with Episodic Memory: The N-back Task\",\"authors\":\"A. Beukers, K. Norman, J. Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.32470/ccn.2019.1311-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a model of how working memory (WM) and episodic memory (EM) interact in the n-back task. Contrary to previous models in which information is actively maintained in WM, our model posits that information about previous stimuli is retained exclusively in EM. Unlike WM-based active maintenance, which has limited maintenance capacity, EM-based storage has unlimited storage capacity but is subject to proactive interference. Using the model we show that benchmark phenomena ordinarily attributed to use of a limited-capacity WM system (the set size effect and the lure interference effect) can also arise in a model with no such maintenance constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1311-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1311-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We present a model of how working memory (WM) and episodic memory (EM) interact in the n-back task. Contrary to previous models in which information is actively maintained in WM, our model posits that information about previous stimuli is retained exclusively in EM. Unlike WM-based active maintenance, which has limited maintenance capacity, EM-based storage has unlimited storage capacity but is subject to proactive interference. Using the model we show that benchmark phenomena ordinarily attributed to use of a limited-capacity WM system (the set size effect and the lure interference effect) can also arise in a model with no such maintenance constraints.