1. 比较宗教和/作为现代主义神学:L ' Évangile et L ' Église和新论文集

{"title":"1. 比较宗教和/作为现代主义神学:L ' Évangile et L ' Église和新论文集","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110584356-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The publication of L’Évangile et l’Église in 1902 was a milestone in Loisy’s trajectory, as well as a landmark in the intellectual history of the Church. Often considered as the starting point of the Modernist crisis in the Catholic Church, the book was the main cause of the intensification of its anti-Modernist politics, culminating in the Syllabus Lamentabili sane exitu and the Encyclical Pascendi dominici gregis in 1907, followed by the so-called anti-Modernist oath in 1910.1 The volume was the first of the petits livres rouges, Loisy’s series of historical and philosophical essays.2 In it, he offered a historical-critical account of primitive Christianity and analyzed the relation of Jesus’ original gospel to the later development of the Church, and of Christian doctrine and cult. Loisy decided the time had come to abandon the protection of the pseudonyms he would normally use to publish on delicate topics.3 In L’Évangile et l’Église he openly insisted on the necessary historicization of early Christianity and consistently applied his now fully developed evolutionary philosophy of history. His rewriting of the Christian origins conveyed a radical reform program for early 20 century Catholicism. It was a plea for a systematic redefinition of the asymmetrical relationship between science and faith in the Church, and, ultimately, for a new understanding of Catholic faith itself. Loisy’s book was condemned locally by Cardinal Richard in early 1903, but it wasn’t until late 1903, after Pius X had come to power, that the volume was placed on the Index of forbidden books.4 In 1903, Loisy published several other “dangerous” volumes, such as Autour d’un petit livre (1903), his second petit livre rouge, in which he tried to defend","PeriodicalId":447623,"journal":{"name":"Alfred Loisy and the Making of History of Religions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1. Comparative Religion and/as Modernist Theology: L’Évangile et l’Église and the Neuilly Essais\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110584356-005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The publication of L’Évangile et l’Église in 1902 was a milestone in Loisy’s trajectory, as well as a landmark in the intellectual history of the Church. Often considered as the starting point of the Modernist crisis in the Catholic Church, the book was the main cause of the intensification of its anti-Modernist politics, culminating in the Syllabus Lamentabili sane exitu and the Encyclical Pascendi dominici gregis in 1907, followed by the so-called anti-Modernist oath in 1910.1 The volume was the first of the petits livres rouges, Loisy’s series of historical and philosophical essays.2 In it, he offered a historical-critical account of primitive Christianity and analyzed the relation of Jesus’ original gospel to the later development of the Church, and of Christian doctrine and cult. Loisy decided the time had come to abandon the protection of the pseudonyms he would normally use to publish on delicate topics.3 In L’Évangile et l’Église he openly insisted on the necessary historicization of early Christianity and consistently applied his now fully developed evolutionary philosophy of history. His rewriting of the Christian origins conveyed a radical reform program for early 20 century Catholicism. It was a plea for a systematic redefinition of the asymmetrical relationship between science and faith in the Church, and, ultimately, for a new understanding of Catholic faith itself. Loisy’s book was condemned locally by Cardinal Richard in early 1903, but it wasn’t until late 1903, after Pius X had come to power, that the volume was placed on the Index of forbidden books.4 In 1903, Loisy published several other “dangerous” volumes, such as Autour d’un petit livre (1903), his second petit livre rouge, in which he tried to defend\",\"PeriodicalId\":447623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alfred Loisy and the Making of History of Religions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alfred Loisy and the Making of History of Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110584356-005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alfred Loisy and the Making of History of Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110584356-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1902年出版的L ' Évangile et L ' Église是卢瓦西轨迹上的一个里程碑,也是教会思想史上的一个里程碑。这本书通常被认为是天主教会现代主义危机的起点,是其反现代主义政治加剧的主要原因,在1907年的教学大纲Lamentabili sane exitu和通谕Pascendi dominici gregis中达到高潮,随后是1910年所谓的反现代主义誓言。该卷是第一个小生命的红色,卢瓦西的一系列历史和哲学论文在书中,他对原始基督教进行了历史批判,并分析了耶稣最初的福音与后来教会、基督教教义和邪教的发展之间的关系。卢瓦西决定是时候放弃对他通常在发表敏感话题时使用的笔名的保护了在L ' Évangile et L ' Église中,他公开坚持早期基督教的必要历史化,并一贯地应用他现在已经充分发展的进化历史哲学。他对基督教起源的改写为20世纪早期的天主教带来了激进的改革计划。它呼吁系统地重新定义科学与教会信仰之间的不对称关系,并最终对天主教信仰本身进行新的理解。1903年初,路易西的书受到当地红衣主教理查德的谴责,但直到1903年底,庇护十世掌权后,这本书才被列入禁书目录1903年,卢瓦西出版了其他几本“危险”的书,比如他的第二本《小生活》(Autour d’un petit livre, 1903),他试图在书中为自己辩护
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1. Comparative Religion and/as Modernist Theology: L’Évangile et l’Église and the Neuilly Essais
The publication of L’Évangile et l’Église in 1902 was a milestone in Loisy’s trajectory, as well as a landmark in the intellectual history of the Church. Often considered as the starting point of the Modernist crisis in the Catholic Church, the book was the main cause of the intensification of its anti-Modernist politics, culminating in the Syllabus Lamentabili sane exitu and the Encyclical Pascendi dominici gregis in 1907, followed by the so-called anti-Modernist oath in 1910.1 The volume was the first of the petits livres rouges, Loisy’s series of historical and philosophical essays.2 In it, he offered a historical-critical account of primitive Christianity and analyzed the relation of Jesus’ original gospel to the later development of the Church, and of Christian doctrine and cult. Loisy decided the time had come to abandon the protection of the pseudonyms he would normally use to publish on delicate topics.3 In L’Évangile et l’Église he openly insisted on the necessary historicization of early Christianity and consistently applied his now fully developed evolutionary philosophy of history. His rewriting of the Christian origins conveyed a radical reform program for early 20 century Catholicism. It was a plea for a systematic redefinition of the asymmetrical relationship between science and faith in the Church, and, ultimately, for a new understanding of Catholic faith itself. Loisy’s book was condemned locally by Cardinal Richard in early 1903, but it wasn’t until late 1903, after Pius X had come to power, that the volume was placed on the Index of forbidden books.4 In 1903, Loisy published several other “dangerous” volumes, such as Autour d’un petit livre (1903), his second petit livre rouge, in which he tried to defend
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusion 2. An Intricate Piece of Institutional History: The Elections for the Chair of History of Religions at the Collège de France (1908–1909) Frontmatter 3. Taking a Stand: Magic, Science, and Religion; History of Religions in the École laïque 4. A Crack in the Historicist Wall: Myth Ritualism as a Weapon against the Christ Myth Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1