岩土工程行业的近地表方法:挑战、机遇和限制

A. Pfaffhuber, S. Bazin, R. Frauenfelder
{"title":"岩土工程行业的近地表方法:挑战、机遇和限制","authors":"A. Pfaffhuber, S. Bazin, R. Frauenfelder","doi":"10.3997/2214-4609.201901666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The geological risk is a major unknown in large-scale infrastructure projects and frequently leads to cost overruns and major delays. Geophysics and remote sensing methods, when properly combined with traditional intrusive techniques, provide value to the geotechnical industry by reducing this risk. Continuous improvement of accuracy and resolution within both remote sensing and geophysics opens up to new innovative applications in the geotechnical industry. We present three examples. Integrating airborne electromagnetics and geotechnical drillings by virtue of machine learning provides dynamic, high-resolution depth of cover / bedrock topography 3D models. Various high-resolution ground geophysics methods identify buried objects that pose a risk to construction works. Finally, satellite-based radar interferometry with some mm / year accuracy provides project owners with settlement monitoring before, during and after construction works, supporting point measurements with traditional methods. Satellite-based, airborne, and ground-based methods have their individual strength and weaknesses. The challenges that projects encounter vary with different phases, thus the key to success is using the right method at the right time.","PeriodicalId":435808,"journal":{"name":"Fifth International Conference on Engineering Geophysics, Al Ain, UAE, 21–24 October 2019","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Near-surface methods in the geotechnical industry: Challenges, opportunities and limitations\",\"authors\":\"A. Pfaffhuber, S. Bazin, R. Frauenfelder\",\"doi\":\"10.3997/2214-4609.201901666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary The geological risk is a major unknown in large-scale infrastructure projects and frequently leads to cost overruns and major delays. Geophysics and remote sensing methods, when properly combined with traditional intrusive techniques, provide value to the geotechnical industry by reducing this risk. Continuous improvement of accuracy and resolution within both remote sensing and geophysics opens up to new innovative applications in the geotechnical industry. We present three examples. Integrating airborne electromagnetics and geotechnical drillings by virtue of machine learning provides dynamic, high-resolution depth of cover / bedrock topography 3D models. Various high-resolution ground geophysics methods identify buried objects that pose a risk to construction works. Finally, satellite-based radar interferometry with some mm / year accuracy provides project owners with settlement monitoring before, during and after construction works, supporting point measurements with traditional methods. Satellite-based, airborne, and ground-based methods have their individual strength and weaknesses. The challenges that projects encounter vary with different phases, thus the key to success is using the right method at the right time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":435808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fifth International Conference on Engineering Geophysics, Al Ain, UAE, 21–24 October 2019\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fifth International Conference on Engineering Geophysics, Al Ain, UAE, 21–24 October 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901666\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifth International Conference on Engineering Geophysics, Al Ain, UAE, 21–24 October 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

地质风险是大型基础设施项目的主要未知因素,经常导致成本超支和重大延误。地球物理和遥感方法与传统的侵入技术相结合,可以降低这种风险,为岩土工程行业提供价值。遥感和地球物理精度和分辨率的不断提高为岩土工程行业开辟了新的创新应用。我们举三个例子。通过机器学习整合航空电磁和岩土钻探,提供动态、高分辨率的覆盖深度/基岩地形3D模型。各种高分辨率地面地球物理方法可以识别对建筑工程构成风险的埋藏物体。最后,基于卫星的雷达干涉测量技术,精度达到毫米/年,为项目业主提供施工前、施工中和施工后的沉降监测,支持传统方法的点测量。基于卫星、机载和地面的方法各有优缺点。项目在不同的阶段会遇到不同的挑战,因此成功的关键是在正确的时间使用正确的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Near-surface methods in the geotechnical industry: Challenges, opportunities and limitations
Summary The geological risk is a major unknown in large-scale infrastructure projects and frequently leads to cost overruns and major delays. Geophysics and remote sensing methods, when properly combined with traditional intrusive techniques, provide value to the geotechnical industry by reducing this risk. Continuous improvement of accuracy and resolution within both remote sensing and geophysics opens up to new innovative applications in the geotechnical industry. We present three examples. Integrating airborne electromagnetics and geotechnical drillings by virtue of machine learning provides dynamic, high-resolution depth of cover / bedrock topography 3D models. Various high-resolution ground geophysics methods identify buried objects that pose a risk to construction works. Finally, satellite-based radar interferometry with some mm / year accuracy provides project owners with settlement monitoring before, during and after construction works, supporting point measurements with traditional methods. Satellite-based, airborne, and ground-based methods have their individual strength and weaknesses. The challenges that projects encounter vary with different phases, thus the key to success is using the right method at the right time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting the fate of chlorinated aliphatics by hydrogeological modelling and DCIP data—Färgaren case study Applied geophysics: Enlarging the view, exposing assumptions, tightening the mesh Subsurface investigations of ground instability using geophysical methods: A case study from West Algiers Interferometric synthetic aperture RADAR (InSAR) and GIS approaches for the retrieval of surface displacement of fault zones in the UAE: Dibba, Wadi Ham and Wadi Shimal, 1992–2018 Near-surface methods in the geotechnical industry: Challenges, opportunities and limitations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1