肩肱中心边缘角与肩袖撕裂的风险:x线平片和MRI研究

Saad M Alqahtani, Sulaiman A. Elyahia, T. B. Abu-Amara, L. Aloraini, Shayma S. Alsubaie, T. Hegazi, M. Alzahrani
{"title":"肩肱中心边缘角与肩袖撕裂的风险:x线平片和MRI研究","authors":"Saad M Alqahtani, Sulaiman A. Elyahia, T. B. Abu-Amara, L. Aloraini, Shayma S. Alsubaie, T. Hegazi, M. Alzahrani","doi":"10.1177/15563316231192952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The acromiohumeral center-edge angle (ACEA) is a parameter that can be measured on plain shoulder radiographs and has been found to be associated with increased risk of sustaining a rotator cuff tear. The aim of this study was to investigate this association using plain radiographs and to explore its applicability on shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the same patients. This retrospective study compared 45 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair between September 2021 and April 2022 and 41 patients with normal shoulders. The ACEA was measured by 2 independent observers on anteroposterior radiographs and shoulder MRI. The collected data were analyzed and P values of <.05 were considered statistically significant. The ACEA was found to be higher in patients with rotator cuff tears (23.48° ± 7.11°) when compared with the control group (15.54° ± 4.4°). On shoulder MRI assessment, a higher ACEA was also seen in the rotator cuff tear group (18.93° ± 6.7°) than in the control group (13.79° ± 4.9°). The ACEA measurement on MRI showed strong intrarater reliability (0.965), but weak interrater reliability (0.251). This retrospective study found an association between increased ACEA and risk of rotator cuff tear when measured on plain radiographs. In addition, we found an association between increased ACEA measurement on shoulder MRI and rotator cuff tears, thus suggesting the applicability of ACEA measurement on shoulder MRI.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"476 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Acromiohumeral Center-Edge Angle and Risk of Rotator Cuff Tear: A Plain Radiograph and MRI Study\",\"authors\":\"Saad M Alqahtani, Sulaiman A. Elyahia, T. B. Abu-Amara, L. Aloraini, Shayma S. Alsubaie, T. Hegazi, M. Alzahrani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15563316231192952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The acromiohumeral center-edge angle (ACEA) is a parameter that can be measured on plain shoulder radiographs and has been found to be associated with increased risk of sustaining a rotator cuff tear. The aim of this study was to investigate this association using plain radiographs and to explore its applicability on shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the same patients. This retrospective study compared 45 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair between September 2021 and April 2022 and 41 patients with normal shoulders. The ACEA was measured by 2 independent observers on anteroposterior radiographs and shoulder MRI. The collected data were analyzed and P values of <.05 were considered statistically significant. The ACEA was found to be higher in patients with rotator cuff tears (23.48° ± 7.11°) when compared with the control group (15.54° ± 4.4°). On shoulder MRI assessment, a higher ACEA was also seen in the rotator cuff tear group (18.93° ± 6.7°) than in the control group (13.79° ± 4.9°). The ACEA measurement on MRI showed strong intrarater reliability (0.965), but weak interrater reliability (0.251). This retrospective study found an association between increased ACEA and risk of rotator cuff tear when measured on plain radiographs. In addition, we found an association between increased ACEA measurement on shoulder MRI and rotator cuff tears, thus suggesting the applicability of ACEA measurement on shoulder MRI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery\",\"volume\":\"476 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316231192952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316231192952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肩肱骨中心边缘角(ACEA)是一个可以在肩部平片上测量的参数,已被发现与持续肩袖撕裂的风险增加有关。本研究的目的是利用x线平片研究这种关联,并探讨其在同一患者的肩部磁共振成像(MRI)上的适用性。这项回顾性研究比较了45名在2021年9月至2022年4月期间接受肩袖修复的患者和41名正常肩部患者。ACEA由2名独立观察员通过正位x线片和肩部MRI测量。对收集的数据进行分析,P值<。0.05认为有统计学意义。肩袖撕裂组ACEA(23.48°±7.11°)高于对照组(15.54°±4.4°)。在肩部MRI评估中,肩袖撕裂组的ACEA(18.93°±6.7°)也高于对照组(13.79°±4.9°)。MRI上的ACEA测量显示出较强的内部信度(0.965),但较弱的内部信度(0.251)。这项回顾性研究发现,在x线平片上测量时,增加的ACEA与肩袖撕裂风险之间存在关联。此外,我们发现肩部MRI上增加的ACEA测量与肩袖撕裂之间存在关联,从而提示肩部MRI上ACEA测量的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Acromiohumeral Center-Edge Angle and Risk of Rotator Cuff Tear: A Plain Radiograph and MRI Study
The acromiohumeral center-edge angle (ACEA) is a parameter that can be measured on plain shoulder radiographs and has been found to be associated with increased risk of sustaining a rotator cuff tear. The aim of this study was to investigate this association using plain radiographs and to explore its applicability on shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the same patients. This retrospective study compared 45 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair between September 2021 and April 2022 and 41 patients with normal shoulders. The ACEA was measured by 2 independent observers on anteroposterior radiographs and shoulder MRI. The collected data were analyzed and P values of <.05 were considered statistically significant. The ACEA was found to be higher in patients with rotator cuff tears (23.48° ± 7.11°) when compared with the control group (15.54° ± 4.4°). On shoulder MRI assessment, a higher ACEA was also seen in the rotator cuff tear group (18.93° ± 6.7°) than in the control group (13.79° ± 4.9°). The ACEA measurement on MRI showed strong intrarater reliability (0.965), but weak interrater reliability (0.251). This retrospective study found an association between increased ACEA and risk of rotator cuff tear when measured on plain radiographs. In addition, we found an association between increased ACEA measurement on shoulder MRI and rotator cuff tears, thus suggesting the applicability of ACEA measurement on shoulder MRI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial Interventions to Reduce Post operative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review The Efficacy of Bone Marrow Stem Cell Therapy in Hip Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Should Surgeons Be Wearing Ear Protection During Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty? Symptomatic Early Rupture of the InSpace Subacromial Balloon Spacer: A Case Report A Nationwide Comparison of Outcomes and Resource Use in Staged vs Simultaneous Cervical and Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Database Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1