面向方面软件的可维护性:一个面向关注的度量框架

E. Figueiredo, C. Sant'Anna, Alessandro F. Garcia, T. Bartolomei, W. Cazzola, A. Marchetto
{"title":"面向方面软件的可维护性:一个面向关注的度量框架","authors":"E. Figueiredo, C. Sant'Anna, Alessandro F. Garcia, T. Bartolomei, W. Cazzola, A. Marchetto","doi":"10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aspect-oriented design needs to be systematically assessed with respect to modularity flaws caused by the realization of driving system concerns, such as tangling, scattering, and excessive concern dependencies. As a result, innovative concern metrics have been defined to support quantitative analyses of concern's properties. However, the vast majority of these measures have not yet being theoretically validated and managed to get accepted in the academic or industrial settings. The core reason for this problem is the fact that they have not been built by using a clearly-defined terminology and criteria. This paper defines a concern-oriented framework that supports the instantiation and comparison of concern measures. The framework subsumes the definition of a core terminology and criteria in order to lay down a rigorous process to foster the definition of meaningful and well-founded concern measures. In order to evaluate the framework generality, we demonstrate the framework instantiation and extension to a number of concern measures suites previously used in empirical studies of aspect-oriented software maintenance.","PeriodicalId":350838,"journal":{"name":"2008 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Maintainability of Aspect-Oriented Software: A Concern-Oriented Measurement Framework\",\"authors\":\"E. Figueiredo, C. Sant'Anna, Alessandro F. Garcia, T. Bartolomei, W. Cazzola, A. Marchetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aspect-oriented design needs to be systematically assessed with respect to modularity flaws caused by the realization of driving system concerns, such as tangling, scattering, and excessive concern dependencies. As a result, innovative concern metrics have been defined to support quantitative analyses of concern's properties. However, the vast majority of these measures have not yet being theoretically validated and managed to get accepted in the academic or industrial settings. The core reason for this problem is the fact that they have not been built by using a clearly-defined terminology and criteria. This paper defines a concern-oriented framework that supports the instantiation and comparison of concern measures. The framework subsumes the definition of a core terminology and criteria in order to lay down a rigorous process to foster the definition of meaningful and well-founded concern measures. In order to evaluate the framework generality, we demonstrate the framework instantiation and extension to a number of concern measures suites previously used in empirical studies of aspect-oriented software maintenance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"82\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

摘要

面向方面的设计需要系统地评估由驱动系统关注的实现引起的模块化缺陷,例如纠缠、分散和过度的关注依赖。因此,已经定义了创新的关注度量来支持对关注属性的定量分析。然而,这些措施中的绝大多数尚未在理论上得到验证,并设法在学术或工业环境中得到接受。这个问题的核心原因是它们没有使用定义明确的术语和标准来构建。本文定义了一个面向关注的框架,它支持关注度量的实例化和比较。该框架包含了核心术语和标准的定义,以便制定一个严格的过程,以促进有意义和有充分根据的关注措施的定义。为了评估框架的通用性,我们演示了框架的实例化和扩展到许多先前在面向方面的软件维护的实证研究中使用的关注度量套件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Maintainability of Aspect-Oriented Software: A Concern-Oriented Measurement Framework
Aspect-oriented design needs to be systematically assessed with respect to modularity flaws caused by the realization of driving system concerns, such as tangling, scattering, and excessive concern dependencies. As a result, innovative concern metrics have been defined to support quantitative analyses of concern's properties. However, the vast majority of these measures have not yet being theoretically validated and managed to get accepted in the academic or industrial settings. The core reason for this problem is the fact that they have not been built by using a clearly-defined terminology and criteria. This paper defines a concern-oriented framework that supports the instantiation and comparison of concern measures. The framework subsumes the definition of a core terminology and criteria in order to lay down a rigorous process to foster the definition of meaningful and well-founded concern measures. In order to evaluate the framework generality, we demonstrate the framework instantiation and extension to a number of concern measures suites previously used in empirical studies of aspect-oriented software maintenance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modularity-Oriented Refactoring Quantifying Maintainability in Feature Oriented Product Lines Assessing the Support of ER and UML Class Diagrams during Maintenance Activities on Data Models A Flexible Framework to Support Collaborative Software Evolution Analysis Towards a Benchmark for Evaluating Design Pattern Miner Tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1