基于窗口的并行仿真方案中的事件调度

R. Ayani, H. Rajaei
{"title":"基于窗口的并行仿真方案中的事件调度","authors":"R. Ayani, H. Rajaei","doi":"10.1109/SPDP.1992.242763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors study the impact of load balancing on the performance of a window-based parallel simulation scheme. They show the impact of four scheduling policies: static, dynamic, majority, and longest window. For simple simulation problems where there are a few events and the events need fairly short computation, i.e., small event granularity, the first three policies perform fairly close to each other. However, for large simulation problems where millions of events exist and the event granularity is large, majority scheduling is a better choice. For instance, if each event requires 18.3 ms processing time, majority scheduling performs 38.5% better than dynamic scheduling and 43.6% better than static scheduling.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":265469,"journal":{"name":"[1992] Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing","volume":"15 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Event scheduling in window based parallel simulation schemes\",\"authors\":\"R. Ayani, H. Rajaei\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPDP.1992.242763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors study the impact of load balancing on the performance of a window-based parallel simulation scheme. They show the impact of four scheduling policies: static, dynamic, majority, and longest window. For simple simulation problems where there are a few events and the events need fairly short computation, i.e., small event granularity, the first three policies perform fairly close to each other. However, for large simulation problems where millions of events exist and the event granularity is large, majority scheduling is a better choice. For instance, if each event requires 18.3 ms processing time, majority scheduling performs 38.5% better than dynamic scheduling and 43.6% better than static scheduling.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":265469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1992] Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1992] Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPDP.1992.242763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1992] Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPDP.1992.242763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

研究了负载均衡对一种基于窗口的并行仿真方案性能的影响。它们显示了四种调度策略的影响:静态、动态、多数和最长窗口。对于简单的模拟问题,其中有几个事件,事件需要相当短的计算,即,小的事件粒度,前三个策略执行相当接近彼此。然而,对于存在数百万个事件且事件粒度较大的大型模拟问题,多数调度是更好的选择。例如,如果每个事件需要18.3 ms的处理时间,多数调度比动态调度好38.5%,比静态调度好43.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Event scheduling in window based parallel simulation schemes
The authors study the impact of load balancing on the performance of a window-based parallel simulation scheme. They show the impact of four scheduling policies: static, dynamic, majority, and longest window. For simple simulation problems where there are a few events and the events need fairly short computation, i.e., small event granularity, the first three policies perform fairly close to each other. However, for large simulation problems where millions of events exist and the event granularity is large, majority scheduling is a better choice. For instance, if each event requires 18.3 ms processing time, majority scheduling performs 38.5% better than dynamic scheduling and 43.6% better than static scheduling.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On uniformization of affine dependence algorithms On embedding ternary trees into Boolean hypercubes A divide and conquer approach to shortest paths in planar layered digraphs Advanced software pipelining and the program dependence graph A fast sort using parallelism within memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1