{"title":"对印度市场泡沫的质疑","authors":"Ganapathy G Gangadharan, S. N.","doi":"10.34218/JOM.6.3.2019.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emerging markets such as India provide the investors with returns far greater than those in developed markets; taking the average returns from the period 1995 to 2014 the returns are 4.714% to 3.276% of the developed market (US not included). Majority of emerging markets commenced joining with the capital market of the world, thus allowing huge inflow of capital which in turn paved the path for economic growth. Even though the emerging markets provide high returns these may also be an indication of a bubble formation. Detection of a bubble is a tedious task primarily due to the fundamental value of the security being uncertain, the randomness of the fundamentals of the market make detecting bubbles an arduous task. Ratios that foretold the financial crisis of 2007- Market Capitalization to GDP (Buffet Indicator), Price to Earnings Ratio (PE Ratio), Price to Book Value (PB Ratio), Tobin’s Q. Data is collected from the 1999-2000 from various Indian indices such as NIFTY 50, NIFTY NEXT 50, NIFTY BANK, NIFTY 500 S&P BSE SENSEX, S&P BSE 100. The paper utilizes the ratios mentioned above to detect and back track various bubble episodes in the Indian market; methodology used is the Philips et al (2015) right tailed unit test. The paper is also inclined to take steps to mitigate the effects of bubble by amending the financial policies and the monetary liquidity of the financial system.","PeriodicalId":341058,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Primary Taxonomy (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrogation of a Bubble in the Indian Market\",\"authors\":\"Ganapathy G Gangadharan, S. N.\",\"doi\":\"10.34218/JOM.6.3.2019.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Emerging markets such as India provide the investors with returns far greater than those in developed markets; taking the average returns from the period 1995 to 2014 the returns are 4.714% to 3.276% of the developed market (US not included). Majority of emerging markets commenced joining with the capital market of the world, thus allowing huge inflow of capital which in turn paved the path for economic growth. Even though the emerging markets provide high returns these may also be an indication of a bubble formation. Detection of a bubble is a tedious task primarily due to the fundamental value of the security being uncertain, the randomness of the fundamentals of the market make detecting bubbles an arduous task. Ratios that foretold the financial crisis of 2007- Market Capitalization to GDP (Buffet Indicator), Price to Earnings Ratio (PE Ratio), Price to Book Value (PB Ratio), Tobin’s Q. Data is collected from the 1999-2000 from various Indian indices such as NIFTY 50, NIFTY NEXT 50, NIFTY BANK, NIFTY 500 S&P BSE SENSEX, S&P BSE 100. The paper utilizes the ratios mentioned above to detect and back track various bubble episodes in the Indian market; methodology used is the Philips et al (2015) right tailed unit test. The paper is also inclined to take steps to mitigate the effects of bubble by amending the financial policies and the monetary liquidity of the financial system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Primary Taxonomy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Primary Taxonomy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34218/JOM.6.3.2019.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Primary Taxonomy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34218/JOM.6.3.2019.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
印度等新兴市场为投资者提供的回报远高于发达市场;从1995年到2014年的平均回报率来看,发达市场(不包括美国)的回报率为4.714%至3.276%。大多数新兴市场开始加入世界资本市场,从而允许大量资本流入,从而为经济增长铺平了道路。尽管新兴市场提供了高回报,但这也可能是泡沫形成的迹象。检测泡沫是一项繁琐的任务,主要是因为证券的基本价值是不确定的,市场基本面的随机性使检测泡沫成为一项艰巨的任务。预测2007年金融危机的比率-市值占GDP(巴菲特指标),市盈率(PE比率),市净率(PB比率),托宾Q.数据收集自1999-2000年的各种印度指数,如NIFTY 50, NIFTY NEXT 50, NIFTY BANK, NIFTY 500 s&p BSE SENSEX, s&p BSE 100。本文利用上述比率来检测和回溯印度市场的各种泡沫事件;使用的方法是Philips等人(2015)右尾单元测试。本文还倾向于采取措施,通过修改金融政策和金融体系的货币流动性来减轻泡沫的影响。
Emerging markets such as India provide the investors with returns far greater than those in developed markets; taking the average returns from the period 1995 to 2014 the returns are 4.714% to 3.276% of the developed market (US not included). Majority of emerging markets commenced joining with the capital market of the world, thus allowing huge inflow of capital which in turn paved the path for economic growth. Even though the emerging markets provide high returns these may also be an indication of a bubble formation. Detection of a bubble is a tedious task primarily due to the fundamental value of the security being uncertain, the randomness of the fundamentals of the market make detecting bubbles an arduous task. Ratios that foretold the financial crisis of 2007- Market Capitalization to GDP (Buffet Indicator), Price to Earnings Ratio (PE Ratio), Price to Book Value (PB Ratio), Tobin’s Q. Data is collected from the 1999-2000 from various Indian indices such as NIFTY 50, NIFTY NEXT 50, NIFTY BANK, NIFTY 500 S&P BSE SENSEX, S&P BSE 100. The paper utilizes the ratios mentioned above to detect and back track various bubble episodes in the Indian market; methodology used is the Philips et al (2015) right tailed unit test. The paper is also inclined to take steps to mitigate the effects of bubble by amending the financial policies and the monetary liquidity of the financial system.