财务报表舞弊侦查的决定因素

R. S. M. Hatuwe, Muhammad Nur Deni Musa, Saling -, La Ode Marihi
{"title":"财务报表舞弊侦查的决定因素","authors":"R. S. M. Hatuwe, Muhammad Nur Deni Musa, Saling -, La Ode Marihi","doi":"10.51135/publicpolicy.v3.i1.p16-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was a replication of conceptual model of empirical studies aimed to analyze the effect of professional skepticisms, auditor experience, competency, independence and time pressure on the fraud detection of financial statement. The result of this study was expected to be able reducing the gap among the so many empirical studies existing. This study could be categorized as explanatory research. The samples in this study were all the auditors in BPKP Maluku and Papua consisting of 88 auditors. The analysis tool used was multiple linear regression analysis with questionnaire instrument as data collection instrument. \nThe result of this study showed that (1) Professional skepticism and auditors experience hand significant impact on the author ability in detecting fraud on financial statement. (2) Competence and independence of auditors had not significant effect on the auditors ability in detecting fraud. (3) Time pressure affected the auditors ability in detecting fraud but it was not significant.","PeriodicalId":146455,"journal":{"name":"PUBLIC POLICY (Jurnal Aplikasi Kebijakan Publik & Bisnis)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinant of Fraud Detection on Financial Statement\",\"authors\":\"R. S. M. Hatuwe, Muhammad Nur Deni Musa, Saling -, La Ode Marihi\",\"doi\":\"10.51135/publicpolicy.v3.i1.p16-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was a replication of conceptual model of empirical studies aimed to analyze the effect of professional skepticisms, auditor experience, competency, independence and time pressure on the fraud detection of financial statement. The result of this study was expected to be able reducing the gap among the so many empirical studies existing. This study could be categorized as explanatory research. The samples in this study were all the auditors in BPKP Maluku and Papua consisting of 88 auditors. The analysis tool used was multiple linear regression analysis with questionnaire instrument as data collection instrument. \\nThe result of this study showed that (1) Professional skepticism and auditors experience hand significant impact on the author ability in detecting fraud on financial statement. (2) Competence and independence of auditors had not significant effect on the auditors ability in detecting fraud. (3) Time pressure affected the auditors ability in detecting fraud but it was not significant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PUBLIC POLICY (Jurnal Aplikasi Kebijakan Publik & Bisnis)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PUBLIC POLICY (Jurnal Aplikasi Kebijakan Publik & Bisnis)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51135/publicpolicy.v3.i1.p16-26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PUBLIC POLICY (Jurnal Aplikasi Kebijakan Publik & Bisnis)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51135/publicpolicy.v3.i1.p16-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究复制了实证研究的概念模型,旨在分析专业怀疑、审计师经验、能力、独立性和时间压力对财务报表舞弊检测的影响。本研究的结果有望缩小现有众多实证研究之间的差距。本研究可归类为解释性研究。本研究的样本是BPKP马鲁古和巴布亚的所有审计员,共有88名审计员。分析工具为多元线性回归分析,问卷调查法为数据收集工具。本研究结果表明:(1)职业怀疑主义和审计师经历对作者发现财务报表舞弊的能力有显著影响。(2)审计人员的胜任能力和独立性对审计人员发现舞弊的能力没有显著影响。(3)时间压力对审计师发现舞弊的能力有影响,但影响不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determinant of Fraud Detection on Financial Statement
This study was a replication of conceptual model of empirical studies aimed to analyze the effect of professional skepticisms, auditor experience, competency, independence and time pressure on the fraud detection of financial statement. The result of this study was expected to be able reducing the gap among the so many empirical studies existing. This study could be categorized as explanatory research. The samples in this study were all the auditors in BPKP Maluku and Papua consisting of 88 auditors. The analysis tool used was multiple linear regression analysis with questionnaire instrument as data collection instrument. The result of this study showed that (1) Professional skepticism and auditors experience hand significant impact on the author ability in detecting fraud on financial statement. (2) Competence and independence of auditors had not significant effect on the auditors ability in detecting fraud. (3) Time pressure affected the auditors ability in detecting fraud but it was not significant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Parking Retribution and Illegal Parking Management and Their Effect on Original Local Goverment Revenue Eksistensi Budaya Pataheri Suku Nuaulu ditengah Arus Modernisasi pada Negeri Nuanea The Influence of Financial Literacy, Self-Control and Parents's Socio Economic Status on Students Consumptive Behavior Disparity of Conviction Cases Blasphemy in Indonesia Pengaruh Desain Henna, Persepsi Harga dan Word of Mouth Terhadap Minat Beli Konsumen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1