{"title":"向“外来者”开放福利国家","authors":"Mahito Hayashi","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines local/national trajectories of social movements for\n homeless people, arguing that ‘pro-homeless’ activism has fundamentally\n improved the Japanese welfare state. State-led high growth historically\n allocated resources favouring capitalist expansion, not people’s welfare.\n This tendency hit the homeless the most. In turn, this has given\n pro-homeless activism significant potentials and capacities. Firstly,\n pro-homeless activism has dominantly taken local forms, improving\n welfare provision at welfare offices. Secondly, in the late 2000s, activism\n won achievements at the national level, by reframing homelessness as a\n national problem. Thirdly, the wholesale inclusion of the homeless/poor\n has evoked their re-marginalization. Today, neoliberal/neoconservative\n forces are advancing anti-poor politics to revoke movements’ prior successes,\n paradoxically testifying to the power of pro-homeless activism in\n developing the welfare state.","PeriodicalId":148986,"journal":{"name":"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opening up the Welfare State to ‘Outsiders’\",\"authors\":\"Mahito Hayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter examines local/national trajectories of social movements for\\n homeless people, arguing that ‘pro-homeless’ activism has fundamentally\\n improved the Japanese welfare state. State-led high growth historically\\n allocated resources favouring capitalist expansion, not people’s welfare.\\n This tendency hit the homeless the most. In turn, this has given\\n pro-homeless activism significant potentials and capacities. Firstly,\\n pro-homeless activism has dominantly taken local forms, improving\\n welfare provision at welfare offices. Secondly, in the late 2000s, activism\\n won achievements at the national level, by reframing homelessness as a\\n national problem. Thirdly, the wholesale inclusion of the homeless/poor\\n has evoked their re-marginalization. Today, neoliberal/neoconservative\\n forces are advancing anti-poor politics to revoke movements’ prior successes,\\n paradoxically testifying to the power of pro-homeless activism in\\n developing the welfare state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter examines local/national trajectories of social movements for
homeless people, arguing that ‘pro-homeless’ activism has fundamentally
improved the Japanese welfare state. State-led high growth historically
allocated resources favouring capitalist expansion, not people’s welfare.
This tendency hit the homeless the most. In turn, this has given
pro-homeless activism significant potentials and capacities. Firstly,
pro-homeless activism has dominantly taken local forms, improving
welfare provision at welfare offices. Secondly, in the late 2000s, activism
won achievements at the national level, by reframing homelessness as a
national problem. Thirdly, the wholesale inclusion of the homeless/poor
has evoked their re-marginalization. Today, neoliberal/neoconservative
forces are advancing anti-poor politics to revoke movements’ prior successes,
paradoxically testifying to the power of pro-homeless activism in
developing the welfare state.