推断启动HIV-1感染的初始变异的多样性:一项系统综述和个体患者数据荟萃分析。

James Baxter, Sarah Langhorne, T. Shi, D. Tully, C. Villabona-Arenas, S. Hué, J. Albert, A. Leigh Brown, K. Atkins
{"title":"推断启动HIV-1感染的初始变异的多样性:一项系统综述和个体患者数据荟萃分析。","authors":"James Baxter, Sarah Langhorne, T. Shi, D. Tully, C. Villabona-Arenas, S. Hué, J. Albert, A. Leigh Brown, K. Atkins","doi":"10.1101/2021.07.14.21259809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nHIV-1 infections initiated by multiple founder variants are characterised by a higher viral load and a worse clinical prognosis than those initiated with single founder variants, yet little is known about the routes of exposure through which transmission of multiple founder variants is most probable. Here we used individual patient data to calculate the probability of multiple founders stratified by route of HIV exposure and study methodology.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that estimated founder variant multiplicity in HIV-1 infection, searching MEDLINE, Embase, and Global Health databases for papers published between Jan 1, 1990, and Sept 14, 2020. Eligible studies must have reported original estimates of founder variant multiplicity in people with acute or early HIV-1 infections, have clearly detailed the methods used, and reported the route of exposure. Studies were excluded if they reported data concerning people living with HIV-1 who had known or suspected superinfection, who were documented as having received pre-exposure prophylaxis, or if the transmitting partner was known to be receiving antiretroviral treatment. Individual patient data were collated from all studies, with authors contacted if these data were not publicly available. We applied logistic meta-regression to these data to estimate the probability that an HIV infection is initiated by multiple founder variants. We calculated a pooled estimate using a random effects model, subsequently stratifying this estimate across exposure routes in a univariable analysis. We then extended our model to adjust for different study methods in a multivariable analysis, recalculating estimates across the exposure routes. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020202672.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nWe included 70 publications in our analysis, comprising 1657 individual patients. Our pooled estimate of the probability that an infection is initiated by multiple founder variants was 0·25 (95% CI 0·21-0·29), with moderate heterogeneity (Q=132·3, p<0·0001, I2=64·2%). Our multivariable analysis uncovered differences in the probability of multiple variant infection by exposure route. Relative to a baseline of male-to-female transmission, the predicted probability for female-to-male multiple variant transmission was significantly lower at 0·13 (95% CI 0·08-0·20), and the probabilities were significantly higher for transmissions in people who inject drugs (0·37 [0·24-0·53]) and men who have sex with men (0·30 [0·33-0·40]). There was no significant difference in the probability of multiple variant transmission between male-to-female transmission (0·21 [0·14-0·31]), post-partum transmission (0·18 [0·03-0·57]), pre-partum transmission (0·17 [0·08-0·33]), and intra-partum transmission (0·27 [0·14-0·45]).\n\n\nINTERPRETATION\nWe identified that transmissions in people who inject drugs and men who have sex with men are significantly more likely to result in an infection initiated by multiple founder variants, and female-to-male infections are significantly less probable. Quantifying how the routes of HIV infection affect the transmission of multiple variants allows us to better understand how the evolution and epidemiology of HIV-1 determine clinical outcomes.\n\n\nFUNDING\nMedical Research Council Precision Medicine Doctoral Training Programme and a European Research Council Starting Grant.","PeriodicalId":344281,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet. Microbe","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inferring the multiplicity of founder variants initiating HIV-1 infection: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"James Baxter, Sarah Langhorne, T. Shi, D. Tully, C. Villabona-Arenas, S. Hué, J. Albert, A. Leigh Brown, K. Atkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2021.07.14.21259809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nHIV-1 infections initiated by multiple founder variants are characterised by a higher viral load and a worse clinical prognosis than those initiated with single founder variants, yet little is known about the routes of exposure through which transmission of multiple founder variants is most probable. Here we used individual patient data to calculate the probability of multiple founders stratified by route of HIV exposure and study methodology.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that estimated founder variant multiplicity in HIV-1 infection, searching MEDLINE, Embase, and Global Health databases for papers published between Jan 1, 1990, and Sept 14, 2020. Eligible studies must have reported original estimates of founder variant multiplicity in people with acute or early HIV-1 infections, have clearly detailed the methods used, and reported the route of exposure. Studies were excluded if they reported data concerning people living with HIV-1 who had known or suspected superinfection, who were documented as having received pre-exposure prophylaxis, or if the transmitting partner was known to be receiving antiretroviral treatment. Individual patient data were collated from all studies, with authors contacted if these data were not publicly available. We applied logistic meta-regression to these data to estimate the probability that an HIV infection is initiated by multiple founder variants. We calculated a pooled estimate using a random effects model, subsequently stratifying this estimate across exposure routes in a univariable analysis. We then extended our model to adjust for different study methods in a multivariable analysis, recalculating estimates across the exposure routes. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020202672.\\n\\n\\nFINDINGS\\nWe included 70 publications in our analysis, comprising 1657 individual patients. Our pooled estimate of the probability that an infection is initiated by multiple founder variants was 0·25 (95% CI 0·21-0·29), with moderate heterogeneity (Q=132·3, p<0·0001, I2=64·2%). Our multivariable analysis uncovered differences in the probability of multiple variant infection by exposure route. Relative to a baseline of male-to-female transmission, the predicted probability for female-to-male multiple variant transmission was significantly lower at 0·13 (95% CI 0·08-0·20), and the probabilities were significantly higher for transmissions in people who inject drugs (0·37 [0·24-0·53]) and men who have sex with men (0·30 [0·33-0·40]). There was no significant difference in the probability of multiple variant transmission between male-to-female transmission (0·21 [0·14-0·31]), post-partum transmission (0·18 [0·03-0·57]), pre-partum transmission (0·17 [0·08-0·33]), and intra-partum transmission (0·27 [0·14-0·45]).\\n\\n\\nINTERPRETATION\\nWe identified that transmissions in people who inject drugs and men who have sex with men are significantly more likely to result in an infection initiated by multiple founder variants, and female-to-male infections are significantly less probable. Quantifying how the routes of HIV infection affect the transmission of multiple variants allows us to better understand how the evolution and epidemiology of HIV-1 determine clinical outcomes.\\n\\n\\nFUNDING\\nMedical Research Council Precision Medicine Doctoral Training Programme and a European Research Council Starting Grant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet. Microbe\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet. Microbe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.14.21259809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet. Microbe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.14.21259809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:由多重创始人变异引发的hiv -1感染的特点是病毒载量更高,比由单一创始人变异引发的感染的临床预后更差,但对多种创始人变异最有可能传播的暴露途径知之甚少。在这里,我们使用个体患者数据来计算按HIV暴露途径和研究方法分层的多个创始人的概率。方法:通过检索MEDLINE、Embase和Global Health数据库,检索1990年1月1日至2020年9月14日期间发表的论文,对估计HIV-1感染始创变异多样性的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。符合条件的研究必须报告了急性或早期HIV-1感染者的初始变异多样性的原始估计,清楚地详细说明了所使用的方法,并报告了暴露途径。如果研究报告的数据涉及已知或疑似重复感染的HIV-1感染者,记录显示接受过暴露前预防,或已知传播伴侣正在接受抗逆转录病毒治疗,则排除研究。从所有研究中整理个体患者数据,如果这些数据不能公开获得,与作者联系。我们对这些数据应用逻辑元回归来估计HIV感染是由多个始祖变异引起的概率。我们使用随机效应模型计算了汇总估计,随后在单变量分析中对暴露途径的估计进行了分层。然后,我们扩展了我们的模型,以便在多变量分析中调整不同的研究方法,重新计算跨暴露途径的估计。本研究已注册为PROSPERO, CRD42020202672。结果:我们在分析中纳入了70篇出版物,包括1657名个体患者。我们对由多个始祖变异引发感染的概率的汇总估计为0.25 (95% CI 0.21 - 0.29),具有中等异质性(Q=132 . 3, p< 0.0001, I2= 64.2%)。我们的多变量分析揭示了暴露途径在多变体感染概率上的差异。与男-女传播基线相比,女性-男性多变异传播的预测概率显著低于0.13 (95% CI 0.08 - 0.20),而注射吸毒者(0.37[0.24 - 0.53])和男男性行为者(0.30[0.33 - 0.40])的传播概率显著高于前者。男-女传播(0.21[0.14 - 0.31])、产后传播(0.18[0.03 - 0.57])、产前传播(0.17[0.08 - 0.33])、产中传播(0.27[0.14 - 0.45])的多变异传播概率差异无统计学意义。我们发现,注射吸毒者和男男性行为者之间的传播明显更有可能导致多种创始人变异引起的感染,而女性感染男性的可能性明显更低。量化HIV感染途径如何影响多种变异的传播,使我们能够更好地了解HIV-1的进化和流行病学如何决定临床结果。医学研究委员会精准医学博士培训计划和欧洲研究委员会启动资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inferring the multiplicity of founder variants initiating HIV-1 infection: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND HIV-1 infections initiated by multiple founder variants are characterised by a higher viral load and a worse clinical prognosis than those initiated with single founder variants, yet little is known about the routes of exposure through which transmission of multiple founder variants is most probable. Here we used individual patient data to calculate the probability of multiple founders stratified by route of HIV exposure and study methodology. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that estimated founder variant multiplicity in HIV-1 infection, searching MEDLINE, Embase, and Global Health databases for papers published between Jan 1, 1990, and Sept 14, 2020. Eligible studies must have reported original estimates of founder variant multiplicity in people with acute or early HIV-1 infections, have clearly detailed the methods used, and reported the route of exposure. Studies were excluded if they reported data concerning people living with HIV-1 who had known or suspected superinfection, who were documented as having received pre-exposure prophylaxis, or if the transmitting partner was known to be receiving antiretroviral treatment. Individual patient data were collated from all studies, with authors contacted if these data were not publicly available. We applied logistic meta-regression to these data to estimate the probability that an HIV infection is initiated by multiple founder variants. We calculated a pooled estimate using a random effects model, subsequently stratifying this estimate across exposure routes in a univariable analysis. We then extended our model to adjust for different study methods in a multivariable analysis, recalculating estimates across the exposure routes. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020202672. FINDINGS We included 70 publications in our analysis, comprising 1657 individual patients. Our pooled estimate of the probability that an infection is initiated by multiple founder variants was 0·25 (95% CI 0·21-0·29), with moderate heterogeneity (Q=132·3, p<0·0001, I2=64·2%). Our multivariable analysis uncovered differences in the probability of multiple variant infection by exposure route. Relative to a baseline of male-to-female transmission, the predicted probability for female-to-male multiple variant transmission was significantly lower at 0·13 (95% CI 0·08-0·20), and the probabilities were significantly higher for transmissions in people who inject drugs (0·37 [0·24-0·53]) and men who have sex with men (0·30 [0·33-0·40]). There was no significant difference in the probability of multiple variant transmission between male-to-female transmission (0·21 [0·14-0·31]), post-partum transmission (0·18 [0·03-0·57]), pre-partum transmission (0·17 [0·08-0·33]), and intra-partum transmission (0·27 [0·14-0·45]). INTERPRETATION We identified that transmissions in people who inject drugs and men who have sex with men are significantly more likely to result in an infection initiated by multiple founder variants, and female-to-male infections are significantly less probable. Quantifying how the routes of HIV infection affect the transmission of multiple variants allows us to better understand how the evolution and epidemiology of HIV-1 determine clinical outcomes. FUNDING Medical Research Council Precision Medicine Doctoral Training Programme and a European Research Council Starting Grant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of different preoperative skin antiseptics on the incidence of surgical site infections: a systematic review, GRADE assessment, and network meta-analysis. Nirsevimab: a promising therapy for RSV. Correction to Lancet Microbe 2022; 3: e92. Health inequities and HTLV-1. Correction to Lancet Microbe 2021; published online Dec 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00241-X.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1