{"title":"悬停时并列空中滑行旋翼的声学预测","authors":"J. Sagaga, Seongkyu Lee","doi":"10.4050/f-0077-2021-16695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, acoustic predictions are performed for the rotors of NASA’s side-by-side Urban Air Mobility (UAM) aircraft in hover. Investigations of the acoustics are performed on four overlap configurations, 0%, 5%, 15%, and 25%, in hover via high-fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. CFD simulations are carried out using the HPCMP CREATETM-AV Helios and acoustics calculations are conducted using PSUWOPWOP. Blade airloads and performance of the rotors are computed for this study. Predictions on the rotor airloads and wake geometry are compared for all overlap configurations at a collective pitch angle of 8°. It is shown that the 25% overlap configuration yields a higher overall sound pressure level (OASPL) than for the other overlap configurations, mainly due to stronger blade-vortex-interactions at the entrance and exit locations of the overlap region. It is found that the OASPL difference in hover is above 62 dB at an altitude of 500 ft (152.4 m), which is the UAM aircraft noise guideline suggested by Uber. Additionally, noise for all overlap cases are compared against various background noise levels. Results show that noise from the side-by-side rotor could not be fully concealed by the various background noise at an altitude of 500 ft (152.4 m).\n","PeriodicalId":273020,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acoustic Predictions for the Side-by-Side Air Taxi Rotor in Hover\",\"authors\":\"J. Sagaga, Seongkyu Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.4050/f-0077-2021-16695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this paper, acoustic predictions are performed for the rotors of NASA’s side-by-side Urban Air Mobility (UAM) aircraft in hover. Investigations of the acoustics are performed on four overlap configurations, 0%, 5%, 15%, and 25%, in hover via high-fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. CFD simulations are carried out using the HPCMP CREATETM-AV Helios and acoustics calculations are conducted using PSUWOPWOP. Blade airloads and performance of the rotors are computed for this study. Predictions on the rotor airloads and wake geometry are compared for all overlap configurations at a collective pitch angle of 8°. It is shown that the 25% overlap configuration yields a higher overall sound pressure level (OASPL) than for the other overlap configurations, mainly due to stronger blade-vortex-interactions at the entrance and exit locations of the overlap region. It is found that the OASPL difference in hover is above 62 dB at an altitude of 500 ft (152.4 m), which is the UAM aircraft noise guideline suggested by Uber. Additionally, noise for all overlap cases are compared against various background noise levels. Results show that noise from the side-by-side rotor could not be fully concealed by the various background noise at an altitude of 500 ft (152.4 m).\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":273020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0077-2021-16695\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0077-2021-16695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本文对美国国家航空航天局(NASA)的并排城市空中机动飞机(UAM)的旋翼在悬停状态下进行了声学预测。通过高保真计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟,对悬停时的四种重叠配置(0%、5%、15%和25%)进行了声学研究。使用HPCMP CREATETM-AV Helios进行CFD模拟,使用PSUWOPWOP进行声学计算。本研究计算了叶片气动载荷和转子性能。对转子气动载荷和尾迹几何形状的预测进行了比较,所有重叠配置的集体俯仰角为8°。结果表明,25%的重叠配置比其他重叠配置产生更高的总声压级(OASPL),这主要是由于重叠区域入口和出口位置的叶片-涡相互作用更强。研究发现,在Uber建议的UAM飞机噪声准则500 ft (152.4 m)高度,悬停时的OASPL差值在62 dB以上。此外,将所有重叠情况下的噪声与各种背景噪声水平进行比较。结果表明,在高度为500 ft (152.4 m)时,来自并排转子的噪声不能被各种背景噪声完全掩盖。
Acoustic Predictions for the Side-by-Side Air Taxi Rotor in Hover
In this paper, acoustic predictions are performed for the rotors of NASA’s side-by-side Urban Air Mobility (UAM) aircraft in hover. Investigations of the acoustics are performed on four overlap configurations, 0%, 5%, 15%, and 25%, in hover via high-fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. CFD simulations are carried out using the HPCMP CREATETM-AV Helios and acoustics calculations are conducted using PSUWOPWOP. Blade airloads and performance of the rotors are computed for this study. Predictions on the rotor airloads and wake geometry are compared for all overlap configurations at a collective pitch angle of 8°. It is shown that the 25% overlap configuration yields a higher overall sound pressure level (OASPL) than for the other overlap configurations, mainly due to stronger blade-vortex-interactions at the entrance and exit locations of the overlap region. It is found that the OASPL difference in hover is above 62 dB at an altitude of 500 ft (152.4 m), which is the UAM aircraft noise guideline suggested by Uber. Additionally, noise for all overlap cases are compared against various background noise levels. Results show that noise from the side-by-side rotor could not be fully concealed by the various background noise at an altitude of 500 ft (152.4 m).