FPI相关内容禁止:印尼人权审查

Muhammad Fauzi, Mellayanah Mellayanah, Muhammad Akmal Rizki Rivaldi, Fairuz arta Abhipraya
{"title":"FPI相关内容禁止:印尼人权审查","authors":"Muhammad Fauzi, Mellayanah Mellayanah, Muhammad Akmal Rizki Rivaldi, Fairuz arta Abhipraya","doi":"10.30595/kosmikhukum.v21i2.9947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The release of decisions with Home Ministers, Ministers of Law and Human Rights, Ministers of Communications and Informatics, Attorney General, The Police Chief of the Republic of Indonesia (Kapolri) and the Head of the National Body of Counter-Terrorism has been the basis for the dissolution and banning of all activities of the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI). Following up on this, it issued a declaration of Maklumat Kapolri No. 1/Mak/I/2021 on compliance with the ban on activities, the use of symbols and attributes and the application of fpi activities. Articel 2d of the maklumat forbidding access, uploading, and disseminating content related to FPI via the Internet is considered to have limited human rights. The study aims to see if there are any infractions and irregularities within the human rights code of the FPI content in the declaration. As for the research method used was normative juridical with a legal and conceptual approach. The source of data used is legislation on human rights, books, articles, and other sources related to the study. It was found in the study that article 2d of the maklumat went beyond the human rights code based on the principles of siracusa and the testing of three sets (three part test). Not only that, article 2d of the maklumat also threatens the freedom of press from journalists and the media in charge of spreading information to the public. The advice of the author regarding this matter should be the chief of police to update the declaration according to the purpose and purpose of the declaration issued, or at least revoke article 2d of the maklumat that feels has restricted the special human rights of free expression. This is so that the entire legal action in this country is consistent with the principles of the state of law and human rights.Keywords: human rights, freedom of expression, freedom of pers","PeriodicalId":197254,"journal":{"name":"Kosmik Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Larangan Pengunggahan Konten Terkait FPI: Tinjauan Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Fauzi, Mellayanah Mellayanah, Muhammad Akmal Rizki Rivaldi, Fairuz arta Abhipraya\",\"doi\":\"10.30595/kosmikhukum.v21i2.9947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The release of decisions with Home Ministers, Ministers of Law and Human Rights, Ministers of Communications and Informatics, Attorney General, The Police Chief of the Republic of Indonesia (Kapolri) and the Head of the National Body of Counter-Terrorism has been the basis for the dissolution and banning of all activities of the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI). Following up on this, it issued a declaration of Maklumat Kapolri No. 1/Mak/I/2021 on compliance with the ban on activities, the use of symbols and attributes and the application of fpi activities. Articel 2d of the maklumat forbidding access, uploading, and disseminating content related to FPI via the Internet is considered to have limited human rights. The study aims to see if there are any infractions and irregularities within the human rights code of the FPI content in the declaration. As for the research method used was normative juridical with a legal and conceptual approach. The source of data used is legislation on human rights, books, articles, and other sources related to the study. It was found in the study that article 2d of the maklumat went beyond the human rights code based on the principles of siracusa and the testing of three sets (three part test). Not only that, article 2d of the maklumat also threatens the freedom of press from journalists and the media in charge of spreading information to the public. The advice of the author regarding this matter should be the chief of police to update the declaration according to the purpose and purpose of the declaration issued, or at least revoke article 2d of the maklumat that feels has restricted the special human rights of free expression. This is so that the entire legal action in this country is consistent with the principles of the state of law and human rights.Keywords: human rights, freedom of expression, freedom of pers\",\"PeriodicalId\":197254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kosmik Hukum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kosmik Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v21i2.9947\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kosmik Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v21i2.9947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与内政部长、法律和人权部长、通信和信息部长、总检察长、印度尼西亚共和国警察局长(Kapolri)和国家反恐怖主义机构负责人一起公布的决定,是解散和禁止伊斯兰捍卫者阵线(FPI)所有活动的基础。随后,它发布了Maklumat Kapolri第1/Mak/I/2021号关于遵守禁止活动、使用符号和属性以及应用fpi活动的声明。禁止通过互联网访问、上传和传播与FPI有关的内容的法令第2条被认为是有限的人权。这项研究的目的是看看宣言中FPI内容的人权法典是否存在违规和违规行为。至于使用的研究方法是规范性的司法与法律和概念的方法。所使用的数据来源是关于人权的立法、书籍、文章和与研究有关的其他来源。研究发现,《maklumat》第2条超越了以锡拉库萨原则和三套测试(三部分测试)为基础的人权法。不仅如此,《宪法》第2条还威胁到负责向公众传播信息的记者和媒体的新闻自由。关于这个问题,提交人的建议应该是,警察局长根据发表声明的目的和目的更新声明,或者至少撤销《宣言》第2条,因为它认为限制了言论自由的特殊人权。这是为了使这个国家的所有法律行动都符合法治和人权的原则。关键词:人权、言论自由、言论自由
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Larangan Pengunggahan Konten Terkait FPI: Tinjauan Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia
The release of decisions with Home Ministers, Ministers of Law and Human Rights, Ministers of Communications and Informatics, Attorney General, The Police Chief of the Republic of Indonesia (Kapolri) and the Head of the National Body of Counter-Terrorism has been the basis for the dissolution and banning of all activities of the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI). Following up on this, it issued a declaration of Maklumat Kapolri No. 1/Mak/I/2021 on compliance with the ban on activities, the use of symbols and attributes and the application of fpi activities. Articel 2d of the maklumat forbidding access, uploading, and disseminating content related to FPI via the Internet is considered to have limited human rights. The study aims to see if there are any infractions and irregularities within the human rights code of the FPI content in the declaration. As for the research method used was normative juridical with a legal and conceptual approach. The source of data used is legislation on human rights, books, articles, and other sources related to the study. It was found in the study that article 2d of the maklumat went beyond the human rights code based on the principles of siracusa and the testing of three sets (three part test). Not only that, article 2d of the maklumat also threatens the freedom of press from journalists and the media in charge of spreading information to the public. The advice of the author regarding this matter should be the chief of police to update the declaration according to the purpose and purpose of the declaration issued, or at least revoke article 2d of the maklumat that feels has restricted the special human rights of free expression. This is so that the entire legal action in this country is consistent with the principles of the state of law and human rights.Keywords: human rights, freedom of expression, freedom of pers
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Indonesian-British Strategic Partnership in the Perspective of International Treaty Law Malaysia’s Indisputable Sovereignty Over Sabah Intellectual Property Based Financing: Juridical Review of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 And Relevance of Establishing Intellectual Property Rights Appraisal Institution Interpreting the Material Requirements of Recidivism: Realizing Restorative Justice in the Police Force Judicial Transformation: Integration of AI Judges in Innovating Indonesia's Criminal Justice System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1