SoReady:基于拉式软件开发的基于测试和缺陷覆盖率的分析模型的扩展

Sharifah Mashita Syed-Mohamad, Nur Asyraf Md Akhir
{"title":"SoReady:基于拉式软件开发的基于测试和缺陷覆盖率的分析模型的扩展","authors":"Sharifah Mashita Syed-Mohamad, Nur Asyraf Md Akhir","doi":"10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pull-based software development is a distributed development model that offers an opportunity to review a pull request before it gets merged into the main repository. A pull request addresses new features, bug fixing, and maintenance issues submitted by both integrators or contributors. It appears that many empirical studies are conducted to discover how pull request evaluation is done, and to our knowledge, limited research exists for assessing release readiness of pull requests. Studies also reported that the failure rate of pull-requests rapidly increases when there are many forks created. It is therefore, questions worth exploring are whether the code review really contributing to the code quality, and how to determine the release readiness of pull requests? In our previous work, test and defect coverage-based analytics model (TDCAM) has been proven to be suitable to determine the readiness of releases for software that is rapidly evolving, in which this is also a characteristic of pull-based software development. In this paper, the TDCAM has been extended to include pull request coverage indicators. The proposed model, namely as SoReady and the visualization analysis presented herein has enabled five developers in a commercial setting to make informed and evidence-based decisions regarding the test status of each pull request and overall reliability of an open source software through a prototype dashboard.","PeriodicalId":325642,"journal":{"name":"2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SoReady: An Extension of the Test and Defect Coverage-Based Analytics Model for Pull-Based Software Development\",\"authors\":\"Sharifah Mashita Syed-Mohamad, Nur Asyraf Md Akhir\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pull-based software development is a distributed development model that offers an opportunity to review a pull request before it gets merged into the main repository. A pull request addresses new features, bug fixing, and maintenance issues submitted by both integrators or contributors. It appears that many empirical studies are conducted to discover how pull request evaluation is done, and to our knowledge, limited research exists for assessing release readiness of pull requests. Studies also reported that the failure rate of pull-requests rapidly increases when there are many forks created. It is therefore, questions worth exploring are whether the code review really contributing to the code quality, and how to determine the release readiness of pull requests? In our previous work, test and defect coverage-based analytics model (TDCAM) has been proven to be suitable to determine the readiness of releases for software that is rapidly evolving, in which this is also a characteristic of pull-based software development. In this paper, the TDCAM has been extended to include pull request coverage indicators. The proposed model, namely as SoReady and the visualization analysis presented herein has enabled five developers in a commercial setting to make informed and evidence-based decisions regarding the test status of each pull request and overall reliability of an open source software through a prototype dashboard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于拉的软件开发是一种分布式开发模型,它提供了在合并到主存储库之前检查拉请求的机会。拉取请求处理由集成商或贡献者提交的新特性、bug修复和维护问题。似乎进行了许多实证研究来发现如何进行拉取请求评估,据我们所知,有限的研究存在于评估拉取请求的释放准备情况。研究还报告说,当创建了许多分叉时,拉取请求的失败率会迅速增加。因此,值得探讨的问题是代码审查是否真的对代码质量有贡献,以及如何确定拉取请求的发布准备情况?在我们之前的工作中,基于测试和缺陷覆盖率的分析模型(TDCAM)已经被证明适合于确定快速发展的软件发布的准备情况,其中这也是基于拉的软件开发的一个特征。在本文中,TDCAM已经扩展到包括拉请求覆盖指标。所提出的模型,即SoReady和本文提出的可视化分析,使商业环境中的五个开发人员能够通过原型仪表板对每个拉取请求的测试状态和开源软件的整体可靠性做出明智的、基于证据的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SoReady: An Extension of the Test and Defect Coverage-Based Analytics Model for Pull-Based Software Development
Pull-based software development is a distributed development model that offers an opportunity to review a pull request before it gets merged into the main repository. A pull request addresses new features, bug fixing, and maintenance issues submitted by both integrators or contributors. It appears that many empirical studies are conducted to discover how pull request evaluation is done, and to our knowledge, limited research exists for assessing release readiness of pull requests. Studies also reported that the failure rate of pull-requests rapidly increases when there are many forks created. It is therefore, questions worth exploring are whether the code review really contributing to the code quality, and how to determine the release readiness of pull requests? In our previous work, test and defect coverage-based analytics model (TDCAM) has been proven to be suitable to determine the readiness of releases for software that is rapidly evolving, in which this is also a characteristic of pull-based software development. In this paper, the TDCAM has been extended to include pull request coverage indicators. The proposed model, namely as SoReady and the visualization analysis presented herein has enabled five developers in a commercial setting to make informed and evidence-based decisions regarding the test status of each pull request and overall reliability of an open source software through a prototype dashboard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detecting Duplicate Questions in Stack Overflow via Deep Learning Approaches An Algebraic Approach to Modeling and Verifying Policy-Driven Smart Devices in IoT Systems Integrating Static Program Analysis Tools for Verifying Cautions of Microcontroller How Compact Will My System Be? A Fully-Automated Way to Calculate LoC Reduced by Clone Refactoring Neural Comment Generation for Source Code with Auxiliary Code Classification Task
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1