数字化对新冠疫情下的银行来说是“新常态”还是“挑战”?

N. Versal, Vasyl Erastov, M. Balytska
{"title":"数字化对新冠疫情下的银行来说是“新常态”还是“挑战”?","authors":"N. Versal, Vasyl Erastov, M. Balytska","doi":"10.3846/CIBMEE.2021.608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – to reveal prerequisites of technology-enabled banking development in Lithuania, Poland, and Ukraine; to identify if digitalization was a beneficial factor in households deposits-raising during the COVID-19.\n\nResearch methodology is twofold: analysis of digitalization index based on World Bank data as a premise of tech-nology-enabled banks development; beta-coefficient analysis and descriptive statistics – for digitalization influence assessment.\n\nFindings – digitalization index analysis showed that Lithuania has a more generous benefit in terms of digitalization. Poland and Ukraine follow with a slight gap. Traditional banks of analyzed countries are acting towards digitalization but at different paces. There are both digital and neobanks in Lithuania and Poland, while in Ukraine only digital banks. Analysis of Ukrainian banks deposits highlighted the fact that digital banks were in some cases more preferable for households, especially during a pandemic.\n\nResearch limitations – lack of data: common digitalization indexes could not be calculated for Ukraine; differences in countries’ banking data: content and structuring criteria.\n\nPractical implications – the results could be important for policy recommendations to tackle the blind spots of banking digitalization.\n\nOriginality/Value – suggested digitalization index could be utilized as a universal. Due to DESI limitations, common for EU countries, we were to create our own index and compare results with calculated by European Commission DESI values. While DESI is calculated using some specific survey data, the proposed index is using standardized data of World Bank; the results of digital and traditional banks deposits comparison could be useful for further study.","PeriodicalId":237890,"journal":{"name":"Selected papers of the International Scientific Conference “Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering 2021”","volume":"62 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IS DIGITAL 'NEW NORMAL' OR 'CHALLENGE' FOR BANKS UNDER COVID-19?\",\"authors\":\"N. Versal, Vasyl Erastov, M. Balytska\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/CIBMEE.2021.608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – to reveal prerequisites of technology-enabled banking development in Lithuania, Poland, and Ukraine; to identify if digitalization was a beneficial factor in households deposits-raising during the COVID-19.\\n\\nResearch methodology is twofold: analysis of digitalization index based on World Bank data as a premise of tech-nology-enabled banks development; beta-coefficient analysis and descriptive statistics – for digitalization influence assessment.\\n\\nFindings – digitalization index analysis showed that Lithuania has a more generous benefit in terms of digitalization. Poland and Ukraine follow with a slight gap. Traditional banks of analyzed countries are acting towards digitalization but at different paces. There are both digital and neobanks in Lithuania and Poland, while in Ukraine only digital banks. Analysis of Ukrainian banks deposits highlighted the fact that digital banks were in some cases more preferable for households, especially during a pandemic.\\n\\nResearch limitations – lack of data: common digitalization indexes could not be calculated for Ukraine; differences in countries’ banking data: content and structuring criteria.\\n\\nPractical implications – the results could be important for policy recommendations to tackle the blind spots of banking digitalization.\\n\\nOriginality/Value – suggested digitalization index could be utilized as a universal. Due to DESI limitations, common for EU countries, we were to create our own index and compare results with calculated by European Commission DESI values. While DESI is calculated using some specific survey data, the proposed index is using standardized data of World Bank; the results of digital and traditional banks deposits comparison could be useful for further study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Selected papers of the International Scientific Conference “Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering 2021”\",\"volume\":\"62 8\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Selected papers of the International Scientific Conference “Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering 2021”\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/CIBMEE.2021.608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Selected papers of the International Scientific Conference “Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering 2021”","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/CIBMEE.2021.608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:揭示立陶宛、波兰和乌克兰技术银行发展的先决条件;以确定数字化是否是COVID-19期间家庭存款增加的有利因素。研究方法有两方面:一是基于世界银行数据的数字化指数分析,以此作为技术驱动型银行发展的前提;贝塔系数分析和描述性统计——用于数字化影响评估。调查结果-数字化指数分析显示,立陶宛在数字化方面的收益更大。波兰和乌克兰紧随其后,差距不大。所分析国家的传统银行正在朝着数字化迈进,但步伐不同。立陶宛和波兰都有数字银行和新银行,而乌克兰只有数字银行。对乌克兰银行存款的分析强调了这样一个事实,即数字银行在某些情况下更适合家庭,特别是在大流行期间。研究局限性-缺乏数据:无法计算乌克兰的常见数字化指标;各国银行数据的差异:内容和结构标准。实际意义——研究结果可能对解决银行数字化盲点的政策建议具有重要意义。原创性/价值建议的数字化指标可以作为一种通用指标。由于欧盟国家普遍存在DESI的限制,我们将创建自己的指数,并将结果与欧盟委员会DESI值计算的结果进行比较。DESI的计算使用了一些具体的调查数据,而拟议指数使用的是世界银行的标准化数据;数字银行与传统银行存款的比较结果可以为进一步的研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IS DIGITAL 'NEW NORMAL' OR 'CHALLENGE' FOR BANKS UNDER COVID-19?
Purpose – to reveal prerequisites of technology-enabled banking development in Lithuania, Poland, and Ukraine; to identify if digitalization was a beneficial factor in households deposits-raising during the COVID-19. Research methodology is twofold: analysis of digitalization index based on World Bank data as a premise of tech-nology-enabled banks development; beta-coefficient analysis and descriptive statistics – for digitalization influence assessment. Findings – digitalization index analysis showed that Lithuania has a more generous benefit in terms of digitalization. Poland and Ukraine follow with a slight gap. Traditional banks of analyzed countries are acting towards digitalization but at different paces. There are both digital and neobanks in Lithuania and Poland, while in Ukraine only digital banks. Analysis of Ukrainian banks deposits highlighted the fact that digital banks were in some cases more preferable for households, especially during a pandemic. Research limitations – lack of data: common digitalization indexes could not be calculated for Ukraine; differences in countries’ banking data: content and structuring criteria. Practical implications – the results could be important for policy recommendations to tackle the blind spots of banking digitalization. Originality/Value – suggested digitalization index could be utilized as a universal. Due to DESI limitations, common for EU countries, we were to create our own index and compare results with calculated by European Commission DESI values. While DESI is calculated using some specific survey data, the proposed index is using standardized data of World Bank; the results of digital and traditional banks deposits comparison could be useful for further study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COMPANY FINANCIAL FLOW MODELLING BY SYSTEM DYNAMICS METHODOLOGY THE MODERATING IMPACT OF ECONOMIC POLICY UNCERTAINTY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INVESTMENT IN WORKING CAPITAL AND PROFITABILITY METHODOLOGY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF REGULATION COSTS IN THE BANKING MARKET TRENDS OF MUNICIPAL WASTE FLOWS, COMPOSITION, TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA AND ITS REGIONS FORECASTING COSTS OF CYBER ATTACKS USING ESTIMATION THE GLOBAL COST OF CYBER RISK CALCULATOR V 1.2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1