{"title":"对赖斯和拉姆利的回应","authors":"Roy Bower, William Cipolli","doi":"10.1080/00031305.2023.2182362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We recognize the careful reading of and thought-provoking commentary on our work by Rice and Lumley. Further, we appreciate the opportunity to respond and clarify our position regarding the three presented concerns. We address these points in three sections below and conclude with final remarks in Section 4.","PeriodicalId":342642,"journal":{"name":"The American Statistician","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Response to Rice and Lumley\",\"authors\":\"Roy Bower, William Cipolli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00031305.2023.2182362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We recognize the careful reading of and thought-provoking commentary on our work by Rice and Lumley. Further, we appreciate the opportunity to respond and clarify our position regarding the three presented concerns. We address these points in three sections below and conclude with final remarks in Section 4.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Statistician\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Statistician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2023.2182362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Statistician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2023.2182362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We recognize the careful reading of and thought-provoking commentary on our work by Rice and Lumley. Further, we appreciate the opportunity to respond and clarify our position regarding the three presented concerns. We address these points in three sections below and conclude with final remarks in Section 4.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
