阿根廷卫生保健支出的财政保护:演变和分布(1985-2018)

Juan Marcelo Virdis, María Eugenia Elorza, Fernando Delbianco
{"title":"阿根廷卫生保健支出的财政保护:演变和分布(1985-2018)","authors":"Juan Marcelo Virdis, María Eugenia Elorza, Fernando Delbianco","doi":"10.25115/eea.v40i2.7147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Financial protection from healthcare spending has become an important objective to be addressed by health systems all over the world. A common strategy used to assess financial protection from health care is to estimate the proportion of the population for which out-of-pocket expenditures made at the moment of receiving health services (OOP) might affect the consumption of other goods and services. To this end, two groups of indicators have been developed: catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and impoverishing health expenditure (IHE).  This work aims to investigate how CHE and IHE evolved in Argentina and how equitable was distributed between 1985 and 2018.\nMETHODOLOGY: we estimated CHE and IHE measures, concentration indexes and concentration curves for all studied periods. In addition, we performed dominance analysis of concentration curves in order to assess changes in the distribution of CHE. \nRESULTS: In 2017/18, 9.57 % of Argentina’s population incurred in CHE using a 10 % of total expenditure (EXP) threshold, 5.81 % using a 15 % of EXP, 4.52 % using a 25 % of EXP net of food spending (ATP), and 1.87 % using a 40 % of ATP. All CHE headcount measures dropped considerably between 1996/97 and 2017/18. IHE measures resulted in nearly zero values. The distribution of CHE was found to be progressive in all periods applying different thresholds. Dominance analysis and CI show that 2004/05 was the most progressive period. However, dominance between curves was only found using low specificity criteria.\nDISCUSSION: We found evidence of higher financial protection in the most recent studied period and progressivity of CHE in all periods. A further question to be assessed is whether the lower CHE and progressivity in its distribution is a consequence of an effective public policy or difficulties to access health care.","PeriodicalId":210068,"journal":{"name":"Studies of Applied Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial protection from health care spending in Argentina: evolution and distribution (1985-2018)\",\"authors\":\"Juan Marcelo Virdis, María Eugenia Elorza, Fernando Delbianco\",\"doi\":\"10.25115/eea.v40i2.7147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Financial protection from healthcare spending has become an important objective to be addressed by health systems all over the world. A common strategy used to assess financial protection from health care is to estimate the proportion of the population for which out-of-pocket expenditures made at the moment of receiving health services (OOP) might affect the consumption of other goods and services. To this end, two groups of indicators have been developed: catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and impoverishing health expenditure (IHE).  This work aims to investigate how CHE and IHE evolved in Argentina and how equitable was distributed between 1985 and 2018.\\nMETHODOLOGY: we estimated CHE and IHE measures, concentration indexes and concentration curves for all studied periods. In addition, we performed dominance analysis of concentration curves in order to assess changes in the distribution of CHE. \\nRESULTS: In 2017/18, 9.57 % of Argentina’s population incurred in CHE using a 10 % of total expenditure (EXP) threshold, 5.81 % using a 15 % of EXP, 4.52 % using a 25 % of EXP net of food spending (ATP), and 1.87 % using a 40 % of ATP. All CHE headcount measures dropped considerably between 1996/97 and 2017/18. IHE measures resulted in nearly zero values. The distribution of CHE was found to be progressive in all periods applying different thresholds. Dominance analysis and CI show that 2004/05 was the most progressive period. However, dominance between curves was only found using low specificity criteria.\\nDISCUSSION: We found evidence of higher financial protection in the most recent studied period and progressivity of CHE in all periods. A further question to be assessed is whether the lower CHE and progressivity in its distribution is a consequence of an effective public policy or difficulties to access health care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies of Applied Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies of Applied Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v40i2.7147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies of Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v40i2.7147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:医疗保健支出的财务保护已成为世界各地卫生系统要解决的一个重要目标。用于评估保健方面的财务保护的一个共同战略是,估计在接受保健服务时的自付支出可能影响到其他商品和服务消费的人口比例。为此目的,制定了两组指标:灾难性保健支出(CHE)和贫困化保健支出(IHE)。这项工作旨在调查阿根廷的CHE和IHE是如何演变的,以及1985年至2018年间的公平分配情况。方法:我们估计了所有研究时期的CHE和IHE测量、浓度指数和浓度曲线。此外,我们进行了浓度曲线的优势度分析,以评估CHE分布的变化。结果:在2017/18年度,9.57%的阿根廷人口使用了总支出(EXP)的10%的阈值,5.81%使用了15%的EXP, 4.52%使用了25%的EXP净食品支出(ATP), 1.87%使用了40%的ATP。1996/97至2017/18年间,所有CHE员工人数都大幅下降。IHE测量的结果几乎为零。在应用不同阈值的所有时期,CHE的分布都是渐进的。优势度分析和CI显示,2004/05年是最进步的时期。然而,曲线之间的优势仅在低特异性标准下发现。讨论:我们发现证据表明,在最近的研究时期,较高的财务保护和累进的CHE在所有时期。需要评估的另一个问题是,较低的社会福利水平及其分配的累进性是有效的公共政策的结果,还是难以获得保健的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Financial protection from health care spending in Argentina: evolution and distribution (1985-2018)
INTRODUCTION: Financial protection from healthcare spending has become an important objective to be addressed by health systems all over the world. A common strategy used to assess financial protection from health care is to estimate the proportion of the population for which out-of-pocket expenditures made at the moment of receiving health services (OOP) might affect the consumption of other goods and services. To this end, two groups of indicators have been developed: catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and impoverishing health expenditure (IHE).  This work aims to investigate how CHE and IHE evolved in Argentina and how equitable was distributed between 1985 and 2018. METHODOLOGY: we estimated CHE and IHE measures, concentration indexes and concentration curves for all studied periods. In addition, we performed dominance analysis of concentration curves in order to assess changes in the distribution of CHE.  RESULTS: In 2017/18, 9.57 % of Argentina’s population incurred in CHE using a 10 % of total expenditure (EXP) threshold, 5.81 % using a 15 % of EXP, 4.52 % using a 25 % of EXP net of food spending (ATP), and 1.87 % using a 40 % of ATP. All CHE headcount measures dropped considerably between 1996/97 and 2017/18. IHE measures resulted in nearly zero values. The distribution of CHE was found to be progressive in all periods applying different thresholds. Dominance analysis and CI show that 2004/05 was the most progressive period. However, dominance between curves was only found using low specificity criteria. DISCUSSION: We found evidence of higher financial protection in the most recent studied period and progressivity of CHE in all periods. A further question to be assessed is whether the lower CHE and progressivity in its distribution is a consequence of an effective public policy or difficulties to access health care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Survey on the Spanish Electricity Intraday Market A synergetic vision of advertising as stimuli to enhance sales Study on the Impact of Managerial Entrenchment and Corporate Governance of Firm Performance and Capital Structure Editorial for Special Issue on ‘Advances in Econometric Modeling: Theory and Applications’ Clustering analysis on Hurst dynamic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1