QBF证明系统硬度的原因

Olaf Beyersdorff, Luke Hinde, J. Pich
{"title":"QBF证明系统硬度的原因","authors":"Olaf Beyersdorff, Luke Hinde, J. Pich","doi":"10.1145/3378665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aim to understand inherent reasons for lower bounds for QBF proof systems and revisit and compare two previous approaches in this direction. The first of these relates size lower bounds for strong QBF Frege systems to circuit lower bounds via strategy extraction (Beyersdorff and Pich, LICS’16). Here, we show a refined version of strategy extraction and thereby for any QBF proof system obtain a trichotomy for hardness: (1) via circuit lower bounds, (2) via propositional Resolution lower bounds, or (3) “genuine” QBF lower bounds. The second approach tries to explain QBF lower bounds through quantifier alternations in a system called relaxing QU-Res (Chen, ACM TOCT 2017). We prove a strong lower bound for relaxing QU-Res, which at the same time exhibits significant shortcomings of that model. Prompted by this, we introduce a hierarchy of new systems that improve Chen’s model and prove a strict separation for the complexity of proofs in this hierarchy. We show that lower bounds in our new model correspond to the trichotomy obtained via strategy extraction.","PeriodicalId":198744,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT)","volume":"440 2-3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reasons for Hardness in QBF Proof Systems\",\"authors\":\"Olaf Beyersdorff, Luke Hinde, J. Pich\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3378665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We aim to understand inherent reasons for lower bounds for QBF proof systems and revisit and compare two previous approaches in this direction. The first of these relates size lower bounds for strong QBF Frege systems to circuit lower bounds via strategy extraction (Beyersdorff and Pich, LICS’16). Here, we show a refined version of strategy extraction and thereby for any QBF proof system obtain a trichotomy for hardness: (1) via circuit lower bounds, (2) via propositional Resolution lower bounds, or (3) “genuine” QBF lower bounds. The second approach tries to explain QBF lower bounds through quantifier alternations in a system called relaxing QU-Res (Chen, ACM TOCT 2017). We prove a strong lower bound for relaxing QU-Res, which at the same time exhibits significant shortcomings of that model. Prompted by this, we introduce a hierarchy of new systems that improve Chen’s model and prove a strict separation for the complexity of proofs in this hierarchy. We show that lower bounds in our new model correspond to the trichotomy obtained via strategy extraction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT)\",\"volume\":\"440 2-3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3378665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3378665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

我们的目标是理解QBF证明系统下界的内在原因,并在这个方向上重新审视和比较之前的两种方法。其中第一个是通过策略提取将强QBF Frege系统的大小下界与电路下界联系起来(Beyersdorff和Pich, LICS ' 16)。在这里,我们展示了策略提取的一个改进版本,从而对于任何QBF证明系统获得硬度的三分法:(1)通过电路下界,(2)通过命题分辨率下界,或(3)“真正的”QBF下界。第二种方法试图通过一个称为放松q - res的系统中的量词变化来解释QBF下界(Chen, ACM TOCT 2017)。我们证明了松弛q - res的强下界,同时也暴露了该模型的显著缺陷。在此启发下,我们引入了一个新系统的层次结构来改进Chen的模型,并证明了该层次结构中证明复杂性的严格分离。我们证明了新模型的下界对应于通过策略提取得到的三分法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reasons for Hardness in QBF Proof Systems
We aim to understand inherent reasons for lower bounds for QBF proof systems and revisit and compare two previous approaches in this direction. The first of these relates size lower bounds for strong QBF Frege systems to circuit lower bounds via strategy extraction (Beyersdorff and Pich, LICS’16). Here, we show a refined version of strategy extraction and thereby for any QBF proof system obtain a trichotomy for hardness: (1) via circuit lower bounds, (2) via propositional Resolution lower bounds, or (3) “genuine” QBF lower bounds. The second approach tries to explain QBF lower bounds through quantifier alternations in a system called relaxing QU-Res (Chen, ACM TOCT 2017). We prove a strong lower bound for relaxing QU-Res, which at the same time exhibits significant shortcomings of that model. Prompted by this, we introduce a hierarchy of new systems that improve Chen’s model and prove a strict separation for the complexity of proofs in this hierarchy. We show that lower bounds in our new model correspond to the trichotomy obtained via strategy extraction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Polynomial Degree Bound on Equations for Non-rigid Matrices and Small Linear Circuits Optimal Distribution-Free Sample-Based Testing of Subsequence-Freeness with One-Sided Error Approximate Degree, Weight, and Indistinguishability The (Coarse) Fine-Grained Structure of NP-Hard SAT and CSP Problems Multiplicative Parameterization Above a Guarantee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1