开发健壮的可追溯性基准

Xiaofan Chen, J. Hosking, J. Grundy, R. Amor
{"title":"开发健壮的可追溯性基准","authors":"Xiaofan Chen, J. Hosking, J. Grundy, R. Amor","doi":"10.1109/ASWEC.2013.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traceability benchmarks are essential for the evaluation of traceability recovery techniques. This includes the validation of an individual trace ability technique itself and the objective comparison of the technique with other traceability techniques. However, it is generally acknowledged that it is a real challenge for researchers to obtain or build meaningful and robust benchmarks. This is because of the difficulty of obtaining or creating suitable benchmarks. In this paper, we describe an approach to enable researchers to establish affordable and robust benchmarks. We have designed rigorous manual identification and verification strategies to determine whether or not a link is correct. We have developed a formula to calculate the probability of errors in benchmarks. Analysis of error probability results shows that our approach can produce high quality benchmarks, and our strategies significantly reduce error probability in them.","PeriodicalId":394020,"journal":{"name":"2013 22nd Australian Software Engineering Conference","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Robust Traceability Benchmarks\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofan Chen, J. Hosking, J. Grundy, R. Amor\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASWEC.2013.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traceability benchmarks are essential for the evaluation of traceability recovery techniques. This includes the validation of an individual trace ability technique itself and the objective comparison of the technique with other traceability techniques. However, it is generally acknowledged that it is a real challenge for researchers to obtain or build meaningful and robust benchmarks. This is because of the difficulty of obtaining or creating suitable benchmarks. In this paper, we describe an approach to enable researchers to establish affordable and robust benchmarks. We have designed rigorous manual identification and verification strategies to determine whether or not a link is correct. We have developed a formula to calculate the probability of errors in benchmarks. Analysis of error probability results shows that our approach can produce high quality benchmarks, and our strategies significantly reduce error probability in them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 22nd Australian Software Engineering Conference\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 22nd Australian Software Engineering Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2013.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 22nd Australian Software Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2013.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

可追溯性基准对于可追溯性恢复技术的评估是必不可少的。这包括单个跟踪能力技术本身的验证,以及该技术与其他跟踪技术的客观比较。然而,人们普遍认为,对于研究人员来说,获得或建立有意义和可靠的基准是一个真正的挑战。这是因为很难获得或创建合适的基准。在本文中,我们描述了一种方法,使研究人员能够建立负担得起的和强大的基准。我们设计了严格的手动识别和验证策略来确定链接是否正确。我们开发了一个公式来计算基准测试中的错误概率。对错误概率结果的分析表明,我们的方法可以产生高质量的基准测试,并且我们的策略显着降低了其中的错误概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of Robust Traceability Benchmarks
Traceability benchmarks are essential for the evaluation of traceability recovery techniques. This includes the validation of an individual trace ability technique itself and the objective comparison of the technique with other traceability techniques. However, it is generally acknowledged that it is a real challenge for researchers to obtain or build meaningful and robust benchmarks. This is because of the difficulty of obtaining or creating suitable benchmarks. In this paper, we describe an approach to enable researchers to establish affordable and robust benchmarks. We have designed rigorous manual identification and verification strategies to determine whether or not a link is correct. We have developed a formula to calculate the probability of errors in benchmarks. Analysis of error probability results shows that our approach can produce high quality benchmarks, and our strategies significantly reduce error probability in them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Decomposing Distributed Software Architectures for the Determination and Incorporation of Security and Other Non-functional Requirements What Can Developers' Messages Tell Us? A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Jazz Teams' Attitudes and Behavior Patterns On the Semantics of Scenario-Based Specification Based on Timed Computational Tree Logic Unifying Configuration Management with Merge Conflict Detection and Awareness Systems A Method of Specifying and Classifying Requirements Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1