公共交通用户的最佳集合点

E. Ahmadi, M. Nascimento
{"title":"公共交通用户的最佳集合点","authors":"E. Ahmadi, M. Nascimento","doi":"10.1109/MDM.2018.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consider a group of colleagues going from their offices to their homes, via their preferred subway or bus routes, who wish to find k alternative restaurants to meet and which would minimize a given aggregate deviation distance from their typical routes. We call this the \"k-Optimal Meeting Points for Public Transit\" (k-OMPPT) query and present two approaches for returning provably correct answers for both SUM and MAX aggregate detour distances. Both approaches exploit geometric properties of the problem in order to refine the POI search space and hence reduce the query's processing time. Our experiments, using real datasets, compare the efficiency of both approaches and show which approach is preferable given the type of aggregate the group is interested in minimizing.","PeriodicalId":205319,"journal":{"name":"2018 19th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Meeting Points for Public Transit Users\",\"authors\":\"E. Ahmadi, M. Nascimento\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MDM.2018.00017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consider a group of colleagues going from their offices to their homes, via their preferred subway or bus routes, who wish to find k alternative restaurants to meet and which would minimize a given aggregate deviation distance from their typical routes. We call this the \\\"k-Optimal Meeting Points for Public Transit\\\" (k-OMPPT) query and present two approaches for returning provably correct answers for both SUM and MAX aggregate detour distances. Both approaches exploit geometric properties of the problem in order to refine the POI search space and hence reduce the query's processing time. Our experiments, using real datasets, compare the efficiency of both approaches and show which approach is preferable given the type of aggregate the group is interested in minimizing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 19th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 19th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MDM.2018.00017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 19th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MDM.2018.00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

假设一群同事从办公室到家里,乘坐他们喜欢的地铁或公共汽车路线,他们希望找到k个可供选择的餐馆见面,这些餐馆将最小化与他们典型路线的给定总偏差距离。我们将其称为“k-最优公交交汇点”(k-OMPPT)查询,并提出了两种方法来返回SUM和MAX总绕路距离的可证明的正确答案。这两种方法都利用了问题的几何特性来优化POI搜索空间,从而减少了查询的处理时间。我们的实验使用了真实的数据集,比较了两种方法的效率,并显示了哪种方法更适合最小化群体感兴趣的聚合类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal Meeting Points for Public Transit Users
Consider a group of colleagues going from their offices to their homes, via their preferred subway or bus routes, who wish to find k alternative restaurants to meet and which would minimize a given aggregate deviation distance from their typical routes. We call this the "k-Optimal Meeting Points for Public Transit" (k-OMPPT) query and present two approaches for returning provably correct answers for both SUM and MAX aggregate detour distances. Both approaches exploit geometric properties of the problem in order to refine the POI search space and hence reduce the query's processing time. Our experiments, using real datasets, compare the efficiency of both approaches and show which approach is preferable given the type of aggregate the group is interested in minimizing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FMS: Managing Crowdsourced Indoor Signals with the Fingerprint Management Studio Stochastic Shortest Path Finding in Path-Centric Uncertain Road Networks Concept for Evaluation of Techniques for Trajectory Distance Measures VIPTRA: Visualization and Interactive Processing on Big Trajectory Data DCount - A Probabilistic Algorithm for Accurately Disaggregating Building Occupant Counts into Room Counts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1