不确定性下的投资评估

J. Blatt
{"title":"不确定性下的投资评估","authors":"J. Blatt","doi":"10.2307/3665352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"* Evaluation of future cash flows under conditions of certainty is well known; it leads to the \"discounted present value\" method. This paper shows that maximization of expected utility is a very restrictive method of expressing one's attitude to risk. Most businessmen would judge it unreasonable once it is explained to them what this method really implies. By using a preference ordering, which is not equivalent to any utility function, and by focusing attention on the possibility of unpredictable \"disasters\" in the future, we develop a new method of investment evaluation. Qualitatively, the new approach turns out to be very similar to the one used by businessmen, and not at all similar to discounted present value. We give an example of two projects, A and B, where A is preferred to B by the discounted present value method at all values of the discount rate, but A is inferior to B by the new evaluation. The discussion in the body of this paper is literary. All the mathematics is contained in appendices and can be skipped by the non-mathematical reader. Introduction and Notation","PeriodicalId":318945,"journal":{"name":"Dynamic Economic Systems","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investment evaluation under uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"J. Blatt\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3665352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"* Evaluation of future cash flows under conditions of certainty is well known; it leads to the \\\"discounted present value\\\" method. This paper shows that maximization of expected utility is a very restrictive method of expressing one's attitude to risk. Most businessmen would judge it unreasonable once it is explained to them what this method really implies. By using a preference ordering, which is not equivalent to any utility function, and by focusing attention on the possibility of unpredictable \\\"disasters\\\" in the future, we develop a new method of investment evaluation. Qualitatively, the new approach turns out to be very similar to the one used by businessmen, and not at all similar to discounted present value. We give an example of two projects, A and B, where A is preferred to B by the discounted present value method at all values of the discount rate, but A is inferior to B by the new evaluation. The discussion in the body of this paper is literary. All the mathematics is contained in appendices and can be skipped by the non-mathematical reader. Introduction and Notation\",\"PeriodicalId\":318945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dynamic Economic Systems\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dynamic Economic Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3665352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamic Economic Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3665352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

*在确定性条件下对未来现金流量的评估是众所周知的;这就引出了“贴现现值”法。本文表明,期望效用最大化是表达一个人对风险态度的一种限制性很强的方法。一旦向大多数商人解释这种方法的真正含义,他们就会认为这是不合理的。通过使用不等同于任何效用函数的偏好排序,并通过关注未来不可预测的“灾难”的可能性,我们开发了一种新的投资评估方法。从性质上讲,这种新方法与商人使用的方法非常相似,而与贴现现值完全不同。我们给出了两个项目A和B的例子,其中A在折现率的所有值下都优于B,但A在新的评估中优于B。本文正文部分的讨论是文学性的。所有的数学都包含在附录中,非数学读者可以跳过。引言和注释
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investment evaluation under uncertainty
* Evaluation of future cash flows under conditions of certainty is well known; it leads to the "discounted present value" method. This paper shows that maximization of expected utility is a very restrictive method of expressing one's attitude to risk. Most businessmen would judge it unreasonable once it is explained to them what this method really implies. By using a preference ordering, which is not equivalent to any utility function, and by focusing attention on the possibility of unpredictable "disasters" in the future, we develop a new method of investment evaluation. Qualitatively, the new approach turns out to be very similar to the one used by businessmen, and not at all similar to discounted present value. We give an example of two projects, A and B, where A is preferred to B by the discounted present value method at all values of the discount rate, but A is inferior to B by the new evaluation. The discussion in the body of this paper is literary. All the mathematics is contained in appendices and can be skipped by the non-mathematical reader. Introduction and Notation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Schematic trade cycle models: part II The open Leontief model Balanced growth with Leontief technology Schematic trade cycle models: part I The steady state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1