格列高利的《Nazianzus:动物性与上升

E. Meyer
{"title":"格列高利的《Nazianzus:动物性与上升","authors":"E. Meyer","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823280148.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 1 examines the theological anthropology embedded in two of Gregory of Nazianzus’ renowned sermons—Oration 28 and Oration 39. Oration 39 takes up the language of the prologue to John’s gospel, but subtly shifts the vocabulary so that the “life” common to all creatures is replaced by a “knowledge” that belongs to humanity alone. Oration 28 narrates two different contemplative ascents to God; one in which animality must be sacrificed and one in which animality is humanity’s point of connection to the divine. Both orations demonstrate that human animality is fundamentally unstable in Gregory’s theological anthropology—both the scapegoat for human separation from God and, although it goes unacknowledged, the model for contemplative union with God.","PeriodicalId":158476,"journal":{"name":"Inner Animalities","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gregory of Nazianzus: Animality and Ascent\",\"authors\":\"E. Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.5422/fordham/9780823280148.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter 1 examines the theological anthropology embedded in two of Gregory of Nazianzus’ renowned sermons—Oration 28 and Oration 39. Oration 39 takes up the language of the prologue to John’s gospel, but subtly shifts the vocabulary so that the “life” common to all creatures is replaced by a “knowledge” that belongs to humanity alone. Oration 28 narrates two different contemplative ascents to God; one in which animality must be sacrificed and one in which animality is humanity’s point of connection to the divine. Both orations demonstrate that human animality is fundamentally unstable in Gregory’s theological anthropology—both the scapegoat for human separation from God and, although it goes unacknowledged, the model for contemplative union with God.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inner Animalities\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inner Animalities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823280148.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inner Animalities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823280148.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第一章考察了纳齐安祖的格列高利的两篇著名的布道——《讲道》第28章和《讲道》第39章中所蕴含的神学人类学。《讲道》第39章采用了约翰福音序言的语言,但巧妙地改变了词汇,使所有生物共有的“生命”被只属于人类的“知识”所取代。第28章讲述了两种不同的对上帝的沉思;在其中,动物性必须被牺牲,在其中,动物性是人类与神性的连接点。这两篇演讲都表明,在格列高利的神学人类学中,人类的兽性从根本上说是不稳定的——既是人类与上帝分离的替罪羊,也是与上帝沉思结合的典范,尽管这一点没有得到承认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gregory of Nazianzus: Animality and Ascent
Chapter 1 examines the theological anthropology embedded in two of Gregory of Nazianzus’ renowned sermons—Oration 28 and Oration 39. Oration 39 takes up the language of the prologue to John’s gospel, but subtly shifts the vocabulary so that the “life” common to all creatures is replaced by a “knowledge” that belongs to humanity alone. Oration 28 narrates two different contemplative ascents to God; one in which animality must be sacrificed and one in which animality is humanity’s point of connection to the divine. Both orations demonstrate that human animality is fundamentally unstable in Gregory’s theological anthropology—both the scapegoat for human separation from God and, although it goes unacknowledged, the model for contemplative union with God.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusion 4. Animality and Identity: Human Nature and the Image of God Acknowledgments 5. Animality in Sin and Redemption 2. Gregory of Nyssa: Reading Animality and Desire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1