社交网络中的重叠社区

Stephen Kelley, M. Goldberg, Konstantin Mertsalov, M. Magdon-Ismail, W. Wallace
{"title":"社交网络中的重叠社区","authors":"Stephen Kelley, M. Goldberg, Konstantin Mertsalov, M. Magdon-Ismail, W. Wallace","doi":"10.1504/IJSCCPS.2011.044171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, methods to identify community structure in networks have focused on partitioning the vertex set into a number of disjoint groups. However, recently proposed methods have included mechanisms to account for possible overlap between communities. These approaches have taken a wide variety of forms, resulting in a lack of consensus as to what characteristics overlapping communities should have. Additionally, the application of algorithms which account for community overlap are often justified via intuitive rather than empirical arguments. In this text, each of the issues mentioned above is examined. From previous literature, a minimal set of axioms which overlapping communities should satisfy is presented. Additionally, a modification of a previously published algorithm, iterative scan, is introduced to ensure that these properties are met. Finally, the overlap between communities discovered in a large, real world communication network is examined. The analysis offers empirical justification tha...","PeriodicalId":220482,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Soc. Comput. Cyber Phys. Syst.","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overlapping communities in social networks\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Kelley, M. Goldberg, Konstantin Mertsalov, M. Magdon-Ismail, W. Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJSCCPS.2011.044171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally, methods to identify community structure in networks have focused on partitioning the vertex set into a number of disjoint groups. However, recently proposed methods have included mechanisms to account for possible overlap between communities. These approaches have taken a wide variety of forms, resulting in a lack of consensus as to what characteristics overlapping communities should have. Additionally, the application of algorithms which account for community overlap are often justified via intuitive rather than empirical arguments. In this text, each of the issues mentioned above is examined. From previous literature, a minimal set of axioms which overlapping communities should satisfy is presented. Additionally, a modification of a previously published algorithm, iterative scan, is introduced to ensure that these properties are met. Finally, the overlap between communities discovered in a large, real world communication network is examined. The analysis offers empirical justification tha...\",\"PeriodicalId\":220482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Soc. Comput. Cyber Phys. Syst.\",\"volume\":\"148 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Soc. Comput. Cyber Phys. Syst.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSCCPS.2011.044171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Soc. Comput. Cyber Phys. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSCCPS.2011.044171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

传统的识别网络群体结构的方法主要是将顶点集划分为若干不相交的组。然而,最近提出的方法包括解释社区之间可能重叠的机制。这些方法采取了各种各样的形式,导致对重叠社区应该具有什么特征缺乏共识。此外,用于解释社区重叠的算法的应用通常是通过直觉而不是经验论证来证明的。在本文中,对上面提到的每一个问题都进行了研究。从前人的文献出发,给出了重叠群落应满足的公理的最小集。此外,引入了对先前发布的算法的修改,迭代扫描,以确保满足这些属性。最后,在一个大的,真实世界的通信网络中发现的社区之间的重叠被检查。分析提供了经验证明……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Overlapping communities in social networks
Traditionally, methods to identify community structure in networks have focused on partitioning the vertex set into a number of disjoint groups. However, recently proposed methods have included mechanisms to account for possible overlap between communities. These approaches have taken a wide variety of forms, resulting in a lack of consensus as to what characteristics overlapping communities should have. Additionally, the application of algorithms which account for community overlap are often justified via intuitive rather than empirical arguments. In this text, each of the issues mentioned above is examined. From previous literature, a minimal set of axioms which overlapping communities should satisfy is presented. Additionally, a modification of a previously published algorithm, iterative scan, is introduced to ensure that these properties are met. Finally, the overlap between communities discovered in a large, real world communication network is examined. The analysis offers empirical justification tha...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detecting malicious users in the social networks using machine learning approach Privacy-preserving targeted online advertising Cyber-squatting: a cyber crime more than an unethical act The troika of artificial intelligence, emotional intelligence and customer intelligence Implementation of an efficient and intelligent Indian maritime borderline alert system using IoT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1