从基于传递闭包的模型检查中提取反例

Mitchell Kember, Lynn Tran, George Gao, N. Day
{"title":"从基于传递闭包的模型检查中提取反例","authors":"Mitchell Kember, Lynn Tran, George Gao, N. Day","doi":"10.1109/MiSE.2019.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We address the problem of how to extract counterexamples for the transitive-closure-based model checking (TCMC) technique. TCMC is a representation of the CTLFC (CTL with fairness constraints) model checking problem in first-order logic with transitive closure (FOLTC) and has been implemented in the Alloy Analyzer. It is a declarative, symbolic model checking method. As a CTL model checking method, TCMC is defined over transition systems and states (rather than paths) and therefore, returns a transition system with a bug as a counterexample. Our contribution is to isolate a counterexample path/subgraph in a declarative manner by adding constraints that do not depend on the property. Our method does not require extensions to Alloy.","PeriodicalId":340157,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/ACM 11th International Workshop on Modelling in Software Engineering (MiSE)","volume":"5 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracting Counterexamples from Transitive-Closure-Based Model Checking\",\"authors\":\"Mitchell Kember, Lynn Tran, George Gao, N. Day\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MiSE.2019.00015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We address the problem of how to extract counterexamples for the transitive-closure-based model checking (TCMC) technique. TCMC is a representation of the CTLFC (CTL with fairness constraints) model checking problem in first-order logic with transitive closure (FOLTC) and has been implemented in the Alloy Analyzer. It is a declarative, symbolic model checking method. As a CTL model checking method, TCMC is defined over transition systems and states (rather than paths) and therefore, returns a transition system with a bug as a counterexample. Our contribution is to isolate a counterexample path/subgraph in a declarative manner by adding constraints that do not depend on the property. Our method does not require extensions to Alloy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE/ACM 11th International Workshop on Modelling in Software Engineering (MiSE)\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE/ACM 11th International Workshop on Modelling in Software Engineering (MiSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MiSE.2019.00015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/ACM 11th International Workshop on Modelling in Software Engineering (MiSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MiSE.2019.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们解决了如何为基于传递闭包的模型检查(TCMC)技术提取反例的问题。TCMC是一阶逻辑中带有传递闭包(FOLTC)的CTLFC(带有公平性约束的CTL)模型检查问题的一种表示,并已在Alloy Analyzer中实现。它是一种声明性的符号模型检查方法。作为一种CTL模型检查方法,TCMC是在转换系统和状态(而不是路径)上定义的,因此,返回一个带有错误的转换系统作为反例。我们的贡献是通过添加不依赖于属性的约束,以声明的方式隔离反例路径/子图。我们的方法不需要对Alloy进行扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extracting Counterexamples from Transitive-Closure-Based Model Checking
We address the problem of how to extract counterexamples for the transitive-closure-based model checking (TCMC) technique. TCMC is a representation of the CTLFC (CTL with fairness constraints) model checking problem in first-order logic with transitive closure (FOLTC) and has been implemented in the Alloy Analyzer. It is a declarative, symbolic model checking method. As a CTL model checking method, TCMC is defined over transition systems and states (rather than paths) and therefore, returns a transition system with a bug as a counterexample. Our contribution is to isolate a counterexample path/subgraph in a declarative manner by adding constraints that do not depend on the property. Our method does not require extensions to Alloy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Model-Based Analysis of Serverless Applications Enabling Model-Driven Software Development Tools for the Internet of Things Generic Navigation of Model-Based Development Artefacts On the Difficulties of Raising the Level of Abstraction and Facilitating Reuse in Software Modelling: The Case for Signature Extension Feature Model for Extensions in Modeling Languages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1