金融工程的未来

C. Tapiero
{"title":"金融工程的未来","authors":"C. Tapiero","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2259232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Convergence of financial theory and practice heralded by the seminal and fundamental economic research by Arrow and Debreu in the early 1950’s has led in the hands of financial engineers to an extraordinary financial innovation in the 70’s and ever since. The theoretical ability to price future assets has led to an explosive growth of financial trading, liquidity and to the growth of finance and its citadels. Options and credit derivative markets, securitization of non or partially liquid assets have provided extraordinary opportunities to “unearth” frozen assets for trade and profit. The 2007-2009 financial crisis has evoked a greater awareness that traditional financial dogma is based on assumptions that have become increasingly difficult to justify. Globalization, the growth of \"Too Big To Fail\" (TBTF) firms, insiders trading, information and power asymmetries and the growth of regulation have, among other factors, conspired to render the assumption of complete markets to be unsustainable. Deviant behaviors in financial markets, non-transparency of transactions, complexity and dependence on a global scale have created a fragile and contagious global economy, where systemic risks are no longer an exception but a permanent threat. By the same token, the explosive growth of information and data fueled by the internet and social media as well as an IT has created far greater dependence of financial systems and institutions on Information Technology (IT) emphasizing information as assets they seek to use for both financial management and competitive advantage. Technology, engineering and financial trends and developments have combined to yield an extraordinary growth of complexity, regulation and globalization, providing new opportunities and risks and undermine the traditional model based approaches to finance.The purposes of this paper are to outline a number of factors, economic or otherwise that undermine the finance’s fundamental theories, their practice, regulation and their implications to the future of finance. In particular, we emphasize a strategic and multi-polar finance, beset by complexity, chaos and countervailing forces leading a multi-agent finance, computational and financial data-analytics driven rather than simple risk models of uncertainty.A number of pricing models based on a strategic finance and a micro-matching of economic and financial states are also summarized and their practical implications drawn. In addition, topics such as Big Data finance and multi-agent financial modeling are outlined to provide elements for future theoretical and practical developments. This paper is a work in progress and therefore its intent is to attract greater attention to some elements (however selective and partial) that would contribute to potential transformations of a financial engineering future.","PeriodicalId":414983,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Finance (Topic)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Future of Financial Engineering\",\"authors\":\"C. Tapiero\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2259232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Convergence of financial theory and practice heralded by the seminal and fundamental economic research by Arrow and Debreu in the early 1950’s has led in the hands of financial engineers to an extraordinary financial innovation in the 70’s and ever since. The theoretical ability to price future assets has led to an explosive growth of financial trading, liquidity and to the growth of finance and its citadels. Options and credit derivative markets, securitization of non or partially liquid assets have provided extraordinary opportunities to “unearth” frozen assets for trade and profit. The 2007-2009 financial crisis has evoked a greater awareness that traditional financial dogma is based on assumptions that have become increasingly difficult to justify. Globalization, the growth of \\\"Too Big To Fail\\\" (TBTF) firms, insiders trading, information and power asymmetries and the growth of regulation have, among other factors, conspired to render the assumption of complete markets to be unsustainable. Deviant behaviors in financial markets, non-transparency of transactions, complexity and dependence on a global scale have created a fragile and contagious global economy, where systemic risks are no longer an exception but a permanent threat. By the same token, the explosive growth of information and data fueled by the internet and social media as well as an IT has created far greater dependence of financial systems and institutions on Information Technology (IT) emphasizing information as assets they seek to use for both financial management and competitive advantage. Technology, engineering and financial trends and developments have combined to yield an extraordinary growth of complexity, regulation and globalization, providing new opportunities and risks and undermine the traditional model based approaches to finance.The purposes of this paper are to outline a number of factors, economic or otherwise that undermine the finance’s fundamental theories, their practice, regulation and their implications to the future of finance. In particular, we emphasize a strategic and multi-polar finance, beset by complexity, chaos and countervailing forces leading a multi-agent finance, computational and financial data-analytics driven rather than simple risk models of uncertainty.A number of pricing models based on a strategic finance and a micro-matching of economic and financial states are also summarized and their practical implications drawn. In addition, topics such as Big Data finance and multi-agent financial modeling are outlined to provide elements for future theoretical and practical developments. This paper is a work in progress and therefore its intent is to attract greater attention to some elements (however selective and partial) that would contribute to potential transformations of a financial engineering future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRPN: Innovation & Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRPN: Innovation & Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2259232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2259232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

20世纪50年代初,阿罗和德布鲁开创性的基础经济研究预示着金融理论与实践的融合,这一趋势在金融工程师手中引领了70年代及以后非凡的金融创新。为未来资产定价的理论能力导致了金融交易和流动性的爆炸式增长,也促进了金融及其堡垒的增长。期权和信用衍生品市场,非或部分流动资产的证券化,为“挖掘”冻结资产进行交易和获利提供了绝佳的机会。2007-2009年的金融危机让人们更加意识到,传统的金融教条是建立在越来越难以证明其合理性的假设之上的。全球化、“大到不能倒”(TBTF)公司的增长、内幕交易、信息和权力不对称以及监管的增长,以及其他因素,共同使完全市场的假设变得不可持续。金融市场的越轨行为、交易的不透明、复杂性和对全球规模的依赖,造就了一个脆弱且具有传染性的全球经济,在这个经济中,系统性风险不再是例外,而是一种永久的威胁。同样,由互联网和社交媒体以及IT推动的信息和数据的爆炸式增长,使金融系统和机构对信息技术(IT)的依赖程度大大提高,强调信息是他们寻求用于财务管理和竞争优势的资产。技术、工程和金融趋势与发展相结合,产生了复杂性、监管和全球化的非凡增长,提供了新的机遇和风险,并破坏了传统的基于模式的金融方法。本文的目的是概述一些因素,经济或其他方面,破坏金融的基本理论,他们的实践,监管及其对金融未来的影响。我们特别强调战略和多极金融,受复杂性、混乱和相互抵消力量的困扰,导致多主体金融、计算和金融数据分析驱动,而不是简单的不确定性风险模型。本文还总结了一些基于战略金融和经济金融微观匹配的定价模型,并指出了它们的实际意义。此外,还概述了大数据金融和多主体金融建模等主题,为未来的理论和实践发展提供要素。本文是一项正在进行的工作,因此其目的是吸引人们更多地关注一些因素(无论选择性和局部性),这些因素将有助于金融工程未来的潜在转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Future of Financial Engineering
Convergence of financial theory and practice heralded by the seminal and fundamental economic research by Arrow and Debreu in the early 1950’s has led in the hands of financial engineers to an extraordinary financial innovation in the 70’s and ever since. The theoretical ability to price future assets has led to an explosive growth of financial trading, liquidity and to the growth of finance and its citadels. Options and credit derivative markets, securitization of non or partially liquid assets have provided extraordinary opportunities to “unearth” frozen assets for trade and profit. The 2007-2009 financial crisis has evoked a greater awareness that traditional financial dogma is based on assumptions that have become increasingly difficult to justify. Globalization, the growth of "Too Big To Fail" (TBTF) firms, insiders trading, information and power asymmetries and the growth of regulation have, among other factors, conspired to render the assumption of complete markets to be unsustainable. Deviant behaviors in financial markets, non-transparency of transactions, complexity and dependence on a global scale have created a fragile and contagious global economy, where systemic risks are no longer an exception but a permanent threat. By the same token, the explosive growth of information and data fueled by the internet and social media as well as an IT has created far greater dependence of financial systems and institutions on Information Technology (IT) emphasizing information as assets they seek to use for both financial management and competitive advantage. Technology, engineering and financial trends and developments have combined to yield an extraordinary growth of complexity, regulation and globalization, providing new opportunities and risks and undermine the traditional model based approaches to finance.The purposes of this paper are to outline a number of factors, economic or otherwise that undermine the finance’s fundamental theories, their practice, regulation and their implications to the future of finance. In particular, we emphasize a strategic and multi-polar finance, beset by complexity, chaos and countervailing forces leading a multi-agent finance, computational and financial data-analytics driven rather than simple risk models of uncertainty.A number of pricing models based on a strategic finance and a micro-matching of economic and financial states are also summarized and their practical implications drawn. In addition, topics such as Big Data finance and multi-agent financial modeling are outlined to provide elements for future theoretical and practical developments. This paper is a work in progress and therefore its intent is to attract greater attention to some elements (however selective and partial) that would contribute to potential transformations of a financial engineering future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cryptocurrency, Mining Pools' Concentration, and Asset Prices Cryptocurrency, green and fossil fuel investments Property rights in the Crypto age: NFTs and the auctioning of limited edition artwork Does One Size Fit All? Comparing the Determinants of Fintech Market Segments Expansion (Conference Presentation) Bubbles in Ethereum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1