核数据评估新技术的评估

Reactor Dosimetry: 16th International Symposium Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.1520/STP160820170087

P. Helgesson, D. Neudecker, H. Sjöstrand, M. Grosskopf, D. L. Smith, R. Capote

{"title":"核数据评估新技术的评估","authors":"P. Helgesson, D. Neudecker, H. Sjöstrand, M. Grosskopf, D. L. Smith, R. Capote","doi":"10.1520/STP160820170087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quality of evaluated nuclear data can be impacted by, e.g., the choice of the evaluation algorithm. The objective of this work is to compare the performance of the evaluation techniques GLS, GL ...","PeriodicalId":166400,"journal":{"name":"Reactor Dosimetry: 16th International Symposium","volume":"62 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Novel Techniques for Nuclear Data Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"P. Helgesson, D. Neudecker, H. Sjöstrand, M. Grosskopf, D. L. Smith, R. Capote\",\"doi\":\"10.1520/STP160820170087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The quality of evaluated nuclear data can be impacted by, e.g., the choice of the evaluation algorithm. The objective of this work is to compare the performance of the evaluation techniques GLS, GL ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":166400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reactor Dosimetry: 16th International Symposium\",\"volume\":\"62 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reactor Dosimetry: 16th International Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1520/STP160820170087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reactor Dosimetry: 16th International Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1520/STP160820170087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

摘要

评价核数据的质量可能受到评价算法选择等因素的影响。本研究的目的是比较GLS、GL、GL…

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Assessment of Novel Techniques for Nuclear Data Evaluation

The quality of evaluated nuclear data can be impacted by, e.g., the choice of the evaluation algorithm. The objective of this work is to compare the performance of the evaluation techniques GLS, GL ...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Reactor Dosimetry: 16th International Symposium

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Neutron and Gamma-Ray Radiation Environments for the Annular Core Research Reactor Study of Epithermal-Neutron Spectrum Variation versus Depth in Water Phantoms Design of Separated Element Reflector Experiments in CROCUS: PETALE Evaluation of the 23Na(N,Gamma) Reaction Cross Section Rigorous Uncertainty Propagation Using a Dosimetry Transfer Calibration