风险感知访问控制中的义务

Liang Chen, J. Crampton, M. Kollingbaum, T. Norman
{"title":"风险感知访问控制中的义务","authors":"Liang Chen, J. Crampton, M. Kollingbaum, T. Norman","doi":"10.1109/PST.2012.6297931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing need to share information in dynamic environments has created a requirement for risk-aware access control systems. In this paper, we present a metamodel for risk-aware authorization that captures the key aspects of a system in relation to risk mitigation. In particular, we develop various risk-aware models as instances of the metamodel that broadly differ in the form of risk mitigation that is used (system obligations and user obligations respectively), and study how those obligations are applied to reduce and account for the risk incurred by granting access. Unlike system obligations, an access control system cannot guarantee that user obligations are fulfilled. We propose two approaches to defining risk-aware authorization semantics that takes unfulfilled obligations into account: one is to restrict users' future access because of prior failure to fulfill obligations, and the other is to “reward” users who have been diligent in fulfilling their obligations by permitting risky access requests.","PeriodicalId":434948,"journal":{"name":"2012 Tenth Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obligations in risk-aware access control\",\"authors\":\"Liang Chen, J. Crampton, M. Kollingbaum, T. Norman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PST.2012.6297931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increasing need to share information in dynamic environments has created a requirement for risk-aware access control systems. In this paper, we present a metamodel for risk-aware authorization that captures the key aspects of a system in relation to risk mitigation. In particular, we develop various risk-aware models as instances of the metamodel that broadly differ in the form of risk mitigation that is used (system obligations and user obligations respectively), and study how those obligations are applied to reduce and account for the risk incurred by granting access. Unlike system obligations, an access control system cannot guarantee that user obligations are fulfilled. We propose two approaches to defining risk-aware authorization semantics that takes unfulfilled obligations into account: one is to restrict users' future access because of prior failure to fulfill obligations, and the other is to “reward” users who have been diligent in fulfilling their obligations by permitting risky access requests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Tenth Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Tenth Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2012.6297931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Tenth Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2012.6297931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

在动态环境中共享信息的需求日益增长,这就产生了对风险感知访问控制系统的需求。在本文中,我们提出了一个用于风险感知授权的元模型,该模型捕获了与风险缓解相关的系统的关键方面。特别是,我们开发了各种风险感知模型作为元模型的实例,这些模型在所使用的风险缓解形式(分别为系统义务和用户义务)上存在很大差异,并研究了如何应用这些义务来减少和解释授予访问权限所产生的风险。与系统义务不同,访问控制系统不能保证用户义务的履行。我们提出了两种方法来定义考虑未履行义务的风险感知授权语义:一种是由于先前未能履行义务而限制用户未来的访问,另一种是通过允许有风险的访问请求来“奖励”那些勤奋履行义务的用户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Obligations in risk-aware access control
The increasing need to share information in dynamic environments has created a requirement for risk-aware access control systems. In this paper, we present a metamodel for risk-aware authorization that captures the key aspects of a system in relation to risk mitigation. In particular, we develop various risk-aware models as instances of the metamodel that broadly differ in the form of risk mitigation that is used (system obligations and user obligations respectively), and study how those obligations are applied to reduce and account for the risk incurred by granting access. Unlike system obligations, an access control system cannot guarantee that user obligations are fulfilled. We propose two approaches to defining risk-aware authorization semantics that takes unfulfilled obligations into account: one is to restrict users' future access because of prior failure to fulfill obligations, and the other is to “reward” users who have been diligent in fulfilling their obligations by permitting risky access requests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards requirements for trust management Privacy-preserving resource evaluation in social networks SIPPA-2.0 - Secure information processing with privacy assurance (version 2.0) Exploring re-identification risks in public domains Advice and trust in games of choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1