印尼的电子司法政治法

M. Anwar
{"title":"印尼的电子司法政治法","authors":"M. Anwar","doi":"10.37303/magister.v13i1.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid-19 pandemic has changed public services delivery, including in the field of judicial services. One of these changes is the possibility of the trial process being conducted electronically by mean using information and communication technology, based on the internal regulations issued by the Supreme Court. Of course, every policy has advantages and disadvantages. By reviewing these two things, continuous improvement can be made so that the vison of the Supreme Court can be achieved in the form of estbablishing the ideal judicial body. Based on this, the author then takes two formulations of the problem, namely how is the regulation of electronic justice made by the Supreme Court at this time (ius constitutum)? and how should the regulation of electronic justice be in the future (ius constituendum) so that the vision of estbablishing the ideal judicial body can be achieved? To answer the formulation of the problem, the authors conducted research using normative juridical research methods. From the results of the research that has been carried out, it is concluded that there is disharmony of various regulations related to electronic justice, there are no clear rules regarding the application of the principle of openness to the public in electronic civil proceedings and it is not possible for mediation and diversion processes to be carried out online. Therefore, there is a need for improvement of regulations related to electronic justice, either by revising existing regulations or by making new one. \nKeywords: Policy, Judicial Process, Electronic Litigation","PeriodicalId":441760,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POLITIK HUKUM PERADILAN ELEKTRONIK DI INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"M. Anwar\",\"doi\":\"10.37303/magister.v13i1.58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Covid-19 pandemic has changed public services delivery, including in the field of judicial services. One of these changes is the possibility of the trial process being conducted electronically by mean using information and communication technology, based on the internal regulations issued by the Supreme Court. Of course, every policy has advantages and disadvantages. By reviewing these two things, continuous improvement can be made so that the vison of the Supreme Court can be achieved in the form of estbablishing the ideal judicial body. Based on this, the author then takes two formulations of the problem, namely how is the regulation of electronic justice made by the Supreme Court at this time (ius constitutum)? and how should the regulation of electronic justice be in the future (ius constituendum) so that the vision of estbablishing the ideal judicial body can be achieved? To answer the formulation of the problem, the authors conducted research using normative juridical research methods. From the results of the research that has been carried out, it is concluded that there is disharmony of various regulations related to electronic justice, there are no clear rules regarding the application of the principle of openness to the public in electronic civil proceedings and it is not possible for mediation and diversion processes to be carried out online. Therefore, there is a need for improvement of regulations related to electronic justice, either by revising existing regulations or by making new one. \\nKeywords: Policy, Judicial Process, Electronic Litigation\",\"PeriodicalId\":441760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37303/magister.v13i1.58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37303/magister.v13i1.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行改变了公共服务的提供,包括司法服务领域。其中一项变化是,根据最高法院颁布的内部条例,审判过程可能以电子方式进行,即利用信息和通信技术。当然,每一项政策都有优点和缺点。通过对这两点的审视,可以不断改进,从而以建立理想司法机构的形式实现最高法院的愿景。在此基础上,笔者对问题进行了两种表述,即最高法院此时如何规制电子司法(ius constitutum)?而未来对电子司法的监管又应如何(ius constituentum),才能实现建立理想司法机构的愿景?为了回答这个问题的表述,作者运用规范的司法研究方法进行了研究。从已开展的研究结果来看,与电子司法相关的各种法规存在不协调,电子民事诉讼中对公众公开原则的适用没有明确的规则,调解和分流程序不可能在网上进行。因此,有必要通过修改现行法规或制定新的法规来完善与电子司法相关的法规。关键词:政策,司法程序,电子诉讼
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
POLITIK HUKUM PERADILAN ELEKTRONIK DI INDONESIA
The Covid-19 pandemic has changed public services delivery, including in the field of judicial services. One of these changes is the possibility of the trial process being conducted electronically by mean using information and communication technology, based on the internal regulations issued by the Supreme Court. Of course, every policy has advantages and disadvantages. By reviewing these two things, continuous improvement can be made so that the vison of the Supreme Court can be achieved in the form of estbablishing the ideal judicial body. Based on this, the author then takes two formulations of the problem, namely how is the regulation of electronic justice made by the Supreme Court at this time (ius constitutum)? and how should the regulation of electronic justice be in the future (ius constituendum) so that the vision of estbablishing the ideal judicial body can be achieved? To answer the formulation of the problem, the authors conducted research using normative juridical research methods. From the results of the research that has been carried out, it is concluded that there is disharmony of various regulations related to electronic justice, there are no clear rules regarding the application of the principle of openness to the public in electronic civil proceedings and it is not possible for mediation and diversion processes to be carried out online. Therefore, there is a need for improvement of regulations related to electronic justice, either by revising existing regulations or by making new one. Keywords: Policy, Judicial Process, Electronic Litigation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TRADISI “MEDHOT BENANG LAWE” DALAM UPACARA PERKAWINAN NGLANGKAHI DI DESA PATIHAN KECAMATAN WIDANG KABUPATEN PENERAPAN PEMBELIAN TANAH DALAM RANGKA PENGADAAN TANAH UNTUK BANDARA KEWENANGAN PENGELOLAAN HARTA KEKAYAAN ORANG DIBAWAH PENGAMPUAN OLEH BALAI HARTA PENINGGALAN SURABAYA KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEREK PADA POLO BY RALP LAUREN (Studi putusan No 83/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek2022/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst) IMPLEMENTASI MODERASI BERAGAMA PADA MASYARAKAT DESA BALONGGARUT KECAMATAN KREMBUNG KABUPATEN SIDOARJO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1