{"title":"弹跳射线法与多级快速多极法NASA杏仁雷达截面模拟结果比较","authors":"S. M. Chung, S. Tuan","doi":"10.1109/iWEM49354.2020.9237433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NASA almond CAD model is a standard for radar cross section (RCS) evaluation. In this article we compare the RCS simulation results from Shoot-Bouncing-Ray (SBR) method and Multi-Level-Fast-Multipole-Method (MLFMM). We found under default solver in these two commercial codes, the RCS results show considerable difference in S band where it matters most in terms of RF stealth.","PeriodicalId":201518,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Workshop on Electromagnetics: Applications and Student Innovation Competition (iWEM)","volume":"7 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of NASA Almond Radar Cross Section Simulation Results from Shoot-Bouncing-Ray Method and Multi-Level-Fast-Multipole-Method\",\"authors\":\"S. M. Chung, S. Tuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/iWEM49354.2020.9237433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"NASA almond CAD model is a standard for radar cross section (RCS) evaluation. In this article we compare the RCS simulation results from Shoot-Bouncing-Ray (SBR) method and Multi-Level-Fast-Multipole-Method (MLFMM). We found under default solver in these two commercial codes, the RCS results show considerable difference in S band where it matters most in terms of RF stealth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 International Workshop on Electromagnetics: Applications and Student Innovation Competition (iWEM)\",\"volume\":\"7 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 International Workshop on Electromagnetics: Applications and Student Innovation Competition (iWEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/iWEM49354.2020.9237433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Workshop on Electromagnetics: Applications and Student Innovation Competition (iWEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iWEM49354.2020.9237433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of NASA Almond Radar Cross Section Simulation Results from Shoot-Bouncing-Ray Method and Multi-Level-Fast-Multipole-Method
NASA almond CAD model is a standard for radar cross section (RCS) evaluation. In this article we compare the RCS simulation results from Shoot-Bouncing-Ray (SBR) method and Multi-Level-Fast-Multipole-Method (MLFMM). We found under default solver in these two commercial codes, the RCS results show considerable difference in S band where it matters most in terms of RF stealth.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
