{"title":"引言","authors":"L. Summers","doi":"10.1353/pfs.2000.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I WANT TO ADDRESS four primary issues regarding the crucial issue of how the United States engages with the rest of the world at the dawn of this new century: —The national security and economic case for American support for open markets around the world, —The case for supporting global economic development more directly, including through our support for the international financial institutions, —The generalized decline in support for global engagement in the United States and its implications for the quantity and quality of our global leadership, and —Some of the domestic political roots for this disengagement and what can be done about them. Let me say a few words about the broader context. This is, in many ways, a critical moment in our nation’s history. America is the world’s largest economy and strongest nation, with no single dominant competitor. At the same time, Americans are growing wary of global entanglements. Market ideas are in ascendancy. There is high regard for business and the rights of capital. But while successful investors are heroes, those at the bottom of the ladder still feel insecure. Internationally, the breakdown of empires and the absence of large power balances have made the world ripe for ethnic and nationalist conflicts.","PeriodicalId":124672,"journal":{"name":"Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services","volume":"232 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introductory Remarks\",\"authors\":\"L. Summers\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/pfs.2000.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I WANT TO ADDRESS four primary issues regarding the crucial issue of how the United States engages with the rest of the world at the dawn of this new century: —The national security and economic case for American support for open markets around the world, —The case for supporting global economic development more directly, including through our support for the international financial institutions, —The generalized decline in support for global engagement in the United States and its implications for the quantity and quality of our global leadership, and —Some of the domestic political roots for this disengagement and what can be done about them. Let me say a few words about the broader context. This is, in many ways, a critical moment in our nation’s history. America is the world’s largest economy and strongest nation, with no single dominant competitor. At the same time, Americans are growing wary of global entanglements. Market ideas are in ascendancy. There is high regard for business and the rights of capital. But while successful investors are heroes, those at the bottom of the ladder still feel insecure. Internationally, the breakdown of empires and the absence of large power balances have made the world ripe for ethnic and nationalist conflicts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services\",\"volume\":\"232 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/pfs.2000.0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pfs.2000.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于美国在新世纪来临之际如何与世界其他国家打交道这一关键问题,我想谈一谈四个主要问题:-美国支持全球开放市场的国家安全和经济理由-更直接地支持全球经济发展的理由,包括通过我们对国际金融机构的支持-美国对全球参与的支持普遍下降及其对我们全球领导的数量和质量的影响-这种退出的一些国内政治根源以及可以采取的措施。让我就更广泛的背景说几句。从许多方面来说,这是我国历史上的一个关键时刻。美国是世界上最大的经济体和最强大的国家,没有单一的主导竞争对手。与此同时,美国人对卷入全球纷争越来越警惕。市场观念占据主导地位。企业和资本的权利受到高度重视。但是,虽然成功的投资者是英雄,但那些处于底层的人仍然感到不安全。在国际上,帝国的崩溃和大国平衡的缺失已经使世界上发生种族和民族主义冲突的时机成熟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introductory Remarks
I WANT TO ADDRESS four primary issues regarding the crucial issue of how the United States engages with the rest of the world at the dawn of this new century: —The national security and economic case for American support for open markets around the world, —The case for supporting global economic development more directly, including through our support for the international financial institutions, —The generalized decline in support for global engagement in the United States and its implications for the quantity and quality of our global leadership, and —Some of the domestic political roots for this disengagement and what can be done about them. Let me say a few words about the broader context. This is, in many ways, a critical moment in our nation’s history. America is the world’s largest economy and strongest nation, with no single dominant competitor. At the same time, Americans are growing wary of global entanglements. Market ideas are in ascendancy. There is high regard for business and the rights of capital. But while successful investors are heroes, those at the bottom of the ladder still feel insecure. Internationally, the breakdown of empires and the absence of large power balances have made the world ripe for ethnic and nationalist conflicts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tort Liability, Insurance Rates, and the Insurance Cycle Brokers and the Insurance of Non-Verifiable Losses Editors' Summary Extending the Theory to Meet the Practice of Insurance The "Crisis" in Medical Malpractice Insurance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1