{"title":"格莱马斯的内涵概念","authors":"Lucas Takeo Shimoda","doi":"10.21709/CASA.V11I2.6547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the partial results of a search for the occurrences of the concept of connotation in Greimas' work. In order to organize the obtained data, conceptual similarities as well as the possible relations with other current issues in the semiotics of Paris School were used as criteria. In this article, the occurrences of “connotation” will be discussed and interpreted under three specific theoretical perspectives, i. e. the concept of sens commun , veridiction and isotopies. The first one discusses the different meanings of sens commun and outlines the possible consequences of this ambiguity for Greimas’ study about the connotative semiotics of Hjelmslev presented in “ Pour une sociologie du sens comun ” (GREIMAS, 1975a). The second highlights the possibilities of working in terms of connotative and denotative isotopies issues related to the opening and closing game of the meanings operated by the relationship between the structure and the historicity of the text. The third one deals with the relationship between connotation and veridiction, especially what concerns the “culture's attitude towards its signs” according to Iuri Lotman's proposition resumed by A. J. Greimas. Rather than performing an exhaustive quantitative scanning, this work aims to propose a critical discussion about the role, even though a minor one, of the concept of connotation in Greimas' work.","PeriodicalId":255210,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Computer Animation and Social Agents","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O CONCEITO DE CONOTAÇÃO EM GREIMAS\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Takeo Shimoda\",\"doi\":\"10.21709/CASA.V11I2.6547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents the partial results of a search for the occurrences of the concept of connotation in Greimas' work. In order to organize the obtained data, conceptual similarities as well as the possible relations with other current issues in the semiotics of Paris School were used as criteria. In this article, the occurrences of “connotation” will be discussed and interpreted under three specific theoretical perspectives, i. e. the concept of sens commun , veridiction and isotopies. The first one discusses the different meanings of sens commun and outlines the possible consequences of this ambiguity for Greimas’ study about the connotative semiotics of Hjelmslev presented in “ Pour une sociologie du sens comun ” (GREIMAS, 1975a). The second highlights the possibilities of working in terms of connotative and denotative isotopies issues related to the opening and closing game of the meanings operated by the relationship between the structure and the historicity of the text. The third one deals with the relationship between connotation and veridiction, especially what concerns the “culture's attitude towards its signs” according to Iuri Lotman's proposition resumed by A. J. Greimas. Rather than performing an exhaustive quantitative scanning, this work aims to propose a critical discussion about the role, even though a minor one, of the concept of connotation in Greimas' work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Computer Animation and Social Agents\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Computer Animation and Social Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21709/CASA.V11I2.6547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Computer Animation and Social Agents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21709/CASA.V11I2.6547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文提出了对格莱马斯作品中内涵概念出现的部分搜索结果。为了组织所获得的数据,以巴黎学派符号学中概念的相似性以及与其他当前问题的可能关系为标准。在本文中,“内涵”的出现将从三个具体的理论角度进行讨论和解释,即共同感的概念、验证和同位素。第一部分讨论了公共感觉的不同含义,并概述了这种模糊性对格莱马斯在“Pour une sociologie du sens common”(格莱马斯,1975a)中提出的海姆斯列夫内涵符号学研究的可能影响。第二个重点是在内涵和外延同位素方面进行工作的可能性,这些问题与文本的结构和历史性之间的关系所操作的意义的开始和结束游戏有关。第三部分根据洛特曼(Iuri Lotman)的“文化对其符号的态度”这一由格雷马斯(A. J. Greimas)重新阐发的命题,探讨内涵与判断的关系。与其进行详尽的定量扫描,这项工作的目的是提出一个关于角色的批判性讨论,即使是次要的,在Greimas的工作中的内涵概念。
This article presents the partial results of a search for the occurrences of the concept of connotation in Greimas' work. In order to organize the obtained data, conceptual similarities as well as the possible relations with other current issues in the semiotics of Paris School were used as criteria. In this article, the occurrences of “connotation” will be discussed and interpreted under three specific theoretical perspectives, i. e. the concept of sens commun , veridiction and isotopies. The first one discusses the different meanings of sens commun and outlines the possible consequences of this ambiguity for Greimas’ study about the connotative semiotics of Hjelmslev presented in “ Pour une sociologie du sens comun ” (GREIMAS, 1975a). The second highlights the possibilities of working in terms of connotative and denotative isotopies issues related to the opening and closing game of the meanings operated by the relationship between the structure and the historicity of the text. The third one deals with the relationship between connotation and veridiction, especially what concerns the “culture's attitude towards its signs” according to Iuri Lotman's proposition resumed by A. J. Greimas. Rather than performing an exhaustive quantitative scanning, this work aims to propose a critical discussion about the role, even though a minor one, of the concept of connotation in Greimas' work.