达卡市一家城市医院临床样本中分离的葡萄球菌对克林霉素的诱导性耐药

S. Akhter, Z. H. Asna, Mushfequr Rahman
{"title":"达卡市一家城市医院临床样本中分离的葡萄球菌对克林霉素的诱导性耐药","authors":"S. Akhter, Z. H. Asna, Mushfequr Rahman","doi":"10.3329/IMCJ.V5I1.9853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inducible clindamycin resistance was detemined in 200 clinical isolates of staphylococci from pus (53.5%) and wound swab (46.5%). The study was done from July 2009 to June 2010, in the Department of Microbiology, BIHS Hospital Dhaka. Inducible clindamycin resistance was demonstrated by placing an erythromycin disc (15 ig) 15 mm apart from the edge of a clindamycin (2 ig) disc in Mueller Hinton agar. When the clindamycin inhibited zone becomes D- shaped the organism was regarded as positive for inducible resistance (D- test positive). Out of 200 staphylococci, 20% had inducible clindamycin resistance, 5% had constitutive clindamycin resistance and remaining 75% was clindamycin sensitive. In case of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 48% had inducible clindamycin resistance while 11.5% was constitutively resistant to clindamycin and remainder were clindamycin sensitive. All clindamycin resistant strains were 100% sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid followed by gentamycin (42%) and tetracycline (42.3%). The findings demonstrated that a substantial proportion of staphylococci in our tertiary care hospital had inducible resistance to clindamycin. Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2011; 5(1): 6-8 Key words: Staphylococcus aureus; Inducible clindamycin resistance; Constitutive clindamycin resistance; D-test DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/imcj.v5i1.9853","PeriodicalId":226732,"journal":{"name":"Ibrahim Medical College Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inducible clindamycin resistance among staphylococci isolated from clinical samples in an urban hospital of Dhaka City\",\"authors\":\"S. Akhter, Z. H. Asna, Mushfequr Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/IMCJ.V5I1.9853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inducible clindamycin resistance was detemined in 200 clinical isolates of staphylococci from pus (53.5%) and wound swab (46.5%). The study was done from July 2009 to June 2010, in the Department of Microbiology, BIHS Hospital Dhaka. Inducible clindamycin resistance was demonstrated by placing an erythromycin disc (15 ig) 15 mm apart from the edge of a clindamycin (2 ig) disc in Mueller Hinton agar. When the clindamycin inhibited zone becomes D- shaped the organism was regarded as positive for inducible resistance (D- test positive). Out of 200 staphylococci, 20% had inducible clindamycin resistance, 5% had constitutive clindamycin resistance and remaining 75% was clindamycin sensitive. In case of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 48% had inducible clindamycin resistance while 11.5% was constitutively resistant to clindamycin and remainder were clindamycin sensitive. All clindamycin resistant strains were 100% sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid followed by gentamycin (42%) and tetracycline (42.3%). The findings demonstrated that a substantial proportion of staphylococci in our tertiary care hospital had inducible resistance to clindamycin. Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2011; 5(1): 6-8 Key words: Staphylococcus aureus; Inducible clindamycin resistance; Constitutive clindamycin resistance; D-test DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/imcj.v5i1.9853\",\"PeriodicalId\":226732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ibrahim Medical College Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ibrahim Medical College Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/IMCJ.V5I1.9853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibrahim Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/IMCJ.V5I1.9853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

从脓液和伤口拭子分离的200株葡萄球菌中检出可诱导的克林霉素耐药(53.5%)。该研究于2009年7月至2010年6月在达卡BIHS医院微生物科进行。将红霉素圆盘(15 ig)置于穆勒·欣顿琼脂中,距离克林霉素(2 ig)圆盘边缘15 mm,证明了诱导克林霉素耐药。当克林霉素抑制区呈D形时,认为该菌具有诱导抗性(D试验阳性)。200株葡萄球菌中,20%具有诱导性耐药,5%具有构成性耐药,其余75%具有克林霉素敏感。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)中,48%对克林霉素具有诱导性耐药,11.5%对克林霉素具有组成性耐药,其余为克林霉素敏感。所有克林霉素耐药菌株对万古霉素和利奈唑胺的敏感性均为100%,其次是庆大霉素(42%)和四环素(42.3%)。结果表明,我们三级医院有相当比例的葡萄球菌对克林霉素具有诱导耐药。易卜拉欣·迈德,上校。j . 2011;[关键词]金黄色葡萄球菌;诱导型克林霉素耐药;本构性克林霉素耐药性;D-test DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/imcj.v5i1.9853
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inducible clindamycin resistance among staphylococci isolated from clinical samples in an urban hospital of Dhaka City
Inducible clindamycin resistance was detemined in 200 clinical isolates of staphylococci from pus (53.5%) and wound swab (46.5%). The study was done from July 2009 to June 2010, in the Department of Microbiology, BIHS Hospital Dhaka. Inducible clindamycin resistance was demonstrated by placing an erythromycin disc (15 ig) 15 mm apart from the edge of a clindamycin (2 ig) disc in Mueller Hinton agar. When the clindamycin inhibited zone becomes D- shaped the organism was regarded as positive for inducible resistance (D- test positive). Out of 200 staphylococci, 20% had inducible clindamycin resistance, 5% had constitutive clindamycin resistance and remaining 75% was clindamycin sensitive. In case of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 48% had inducible clindamycin resistance while 11.5% was constitutively resistant to clindamycin and remainder were clindamycin sensitive. All clindamycin resistant strains were 100% sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid followed by gentamycin (42%) and tetracycline (42.3%). The findings demonstrated that a substantial proportion of staphylococci in our tertiary care hospital had inducible resistance to clindamycin. Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2011; 5(1): 6-8 Key words: Staphylococcus aureus; Inducible clindamycin resistance; Constitutive clindamycin resistance; D-test DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/imcj.v5i1.9853
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-fatal drowning in under-five rural children of Bangladesh Detection of OXA-181/OXA-48 carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae in Bangladesh Use of antibiotics in selected tertiary and primary level health care centers of Bangladesh Effects of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Aegle marmelos (BAEL) leaves on chronic inflammation in rats Jejunal inflammatory fibroid polyp: a rare cause of intussusception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1