{"title":"“在民主社会值得尊重”?福斯特与有争议信仰的表达","authors":"James E. Hurford","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2021.2030949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. In one of history’s most notorious legal proceedings, the judge – an obscure Roman official in a backwater Imperial province – was moved to ask, ‘What is truth?’ One suspects a bureaucratic figure like Pontius Pilate never received an answer that would have satisfied him; however, the quest for truth – and humanity’s right and obligation to seek it – has occupied the species in subsequent centuries.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Worthy of Respect in a Democratic Society’? Forstater and the Expression of Controversial Beliefs\",\"authors\":\"James E. Hurford\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2021.2030949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. In one of history’s most notorious legal proceedings, the judge – an obscure Roman official in a backwater Imperial province – was moved to ask, ‘What is truth?’ One suspects a bureaucratic figure like Pontius Pilate never received an answer that would have satisfied him; however, the quest for truth – and humanity’s right and obligation to seek it – has occupied the species in subsequent centuries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.2030949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.2030949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘Worthy of Respect in a Democratic Society’? Forstater and the Expression of Controversial Beliefs
1. In one of history’s most notorious legal proceedings, the judge – an obscure Roman official in a backwater Imperial province – was moved to ask, ‘What is truth?’ One suspects a bureaucratic figure like Pontius Pilate never received an answer that would have satisfied him; however, the quest for truth – and humanity’s right and obligation to seek it – has occupied the species in subsequent centuries.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
