决策树与集成模型在慢性肾脏疾病分类中的比较分析

Olawumi Olasunkanmi, O. D. Olanloye, Abdulquadri Adegbiji
{"title":"决策树与集成模型在慢性肾脏疾病分类中的比较分析","authors":"Olawumi Olasunkanmi, O. D. Olanloye, Abdulquadri Adegbiji","doi":"10.18100/ijamec.792863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The world is now in the era of big data and processing, and exploring the data has become one of the significant challenges. Hence, researchers have done a lot to analyse these data in the health sector to enhance disease detection and classification using artificial intelligence and ML principles. Kidney disease is one of the terrible conditions in which its late detection has sent many people to untimely graves. ML classifiers have been employed in many dimensions to classify heart disease, but, existing works have not explored the variants of each method for selection of best model parameters. An attempt is being made in this research to study the behaviour of three (3) variants each from two(2) tree-based models in the classification of Kidney Disease. Three of the variants are Complex, Medium and Simple models of Decision tree classifier and the other one are Boosted, Bagged and RUSBoosted of Ensemble Classifiers. Using MATLAB for implementation, the model performance established that the accuracy of Ensemble Classifier (Bagged tree model) is the best, concerning the speed, Decision tree (Complex and Simple tree models have the same and highest value). Hence, the two are the best. In terms of training time, Decision tree(Simple tree) has the least time and therefore the best.","PeriodicalId":120305,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison analysis of decision tree and ensemble models in the classification of chronic kidney diseases\",\"authors\":\"Olawumi Olasunkanmi, O. D. Olanloye, Abdulquadri Adegbiji\",\"doi\":\"10.18100/ijamec.792863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The world is now in the era of big data and processing, and exploring the data has become one of the significant challenges. Hence, researchers have done a lot to analyse these data in the health sector to enhance disease detection and classification using artificial intelligence and ML principles. Kidney disease is one of the terrible conditions in which its late detection has sent many people to untimely graves. ML classifiers have been employed in many dimensions to classify heart disease, but, existing works have not explored the variants of each method for selection of best model parameters. An attempt is being made in this research to study the behaviour of three (3) variants each from two(2) tree-based models in the classification of Kidney Disease. Three of the variants are Complex, Medium and Simple models of Decision tree classifier and the other one are Boosted, Bagged and RUSBoosted of Ensemble Classifiers. Using MATLAB for implementation, the model performance established that the accuracy of Ensemble Classifier (Bagged tree model) is the best, concerning the speed, Decision tree (Complex and Simple tree models have the same and highest value). Hence, the two are the best. In terms of training time, Decision tree(Simple tree) has the least time and therefore the best.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18100/ijamec.792863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18100/ijamec.792863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当今世界已进入大数据和大数据处理时代,数据挖掘已成为重大挑战之一。因此,研究人员做了很多工作来分析卫生部门的这些数据,以利用人工智能和机器学习原理加强疾病检测和分类。肾脏疾病是一种可怕的疾病,它的晚发现使许多人过早地进入坟墓。ML分类器已经在许多维度上被用于对心脏病进行分类,但是,现有的工作并没有探索每种方法选择最佳模型参数的变体。本研究试图研究来自两种基于树的肾脏疾病分类模型的三种变体的行为。其中三种变体是决策树分类器的复杂、中等和简单模型,另一种变体是集成分类器的boosting、Bagged和rusboosting。利用MATLAB实现,模型性能证明了集成分类器(Bagged树模型)的准确率最好,在速度方面,决策树(复杂树模型和简单树模型具有相同的最高值)。因此,这两个是最好的。在训练时间方面,决策树(简单树)的训练时间最少,因此是最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison analysis of decision tree and ensemble models in the classification of chronic kidney diseases
The world is now in the era of big data and processing, and exploring the data has become one of the significant challenges. Hence, researchers have done a lot to analyse these data in the health sector to enhance disease detection and classification using artificial intelligence and ML principles. Kidney disease is one of the terrible conditions in which its late detection has sent many people to untimely graves. ML classifiers have been employed in many dimensions to classify heart disease, but, existing works have not explored the variants of each method for selection of best model parameters. An attempt is being made in this research to study the behaviour of three (3) variants each from two(2) tree-based models in the classification of Kidney Disease. Three of the variants are Complex, Medium and Simple models of Decision tree classifier and the other one are Boosted, Bagged and RUSBoosted of Ensemble Classifiers. Using MATLAB for implementation, the model performance established that the accuracy of Ensemble Classifier (Bagged tree model) is the best, concerning the speed, Decision tree (Complex and Simple tree models have the same and highest value). Hence, the two are the best. In terms of training time, Decision tree(Simple tree) has the least time and therefore the best.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of ANFIS models in Prediction of Streamflow: the case of Seyhan Basin Prediction of electromagnetic power density emitted from GSM base stations by using multiple linear regression Epileptic seizure detection combining power spectral density and high-frequency oscillations Adaptive Neural-Fuzzy controller design combined with LQR to control the position of gantry crane Evaluation of the performance of an unmanned aerial vehicle with artificial intelligence support and Mavlink protocol designed for response to social incidents response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1