粘菌素治疗革兰氏阴性感染的临床结果和安全性:一项前瞻性观察研究

IF 0.3 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2016-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejccm.2016.07.001
Kinnari Desai , Mubin Kazi , Kanchan Ajbani , Mohseen Munshi , Camilla Rodrigues , Rajeev Soman , Anjali Shetty
{"title":"粘菌素治疗革兰氏阴性感染的临床结果和安全性:一项前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Kinnari Desai ,&nbsp;Mubin Kazi ,&nbsp;Kanchan Ajbani ,&nbsp;Mohseen Munshi ,&nbsp;Camilla Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Rajeev Soman ,&nbsp;Anjali Shetty","doi":"10.1016/j.ejccm.2016.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the fact that colistin has a significant activity against MDR gram-negative organisms, its toxicity limits its use. However, the limited therapeutic options due to increasing antibiotic resistance have made re-evaluation of older antibiotics inevitable. In contrast, lack of data to guide the usage of these drugs demands for studies on their safety and efficacy. This studies the clinical outcomes and safety of colistin at a tertiary care centre in Mumbai.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A prospective observational study was conducted at P.D. Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai for a period of seven months. Diagnosis of infection was based on CDC guidelines and APACHE II score was used to assess the severity of illness. Clinical and microbiological response to colistin was evaluated along with the incidence of nephrotoxicity (RIFLE criteria) and neurotoxicity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-two patients (median age 56<!--> <!-->years, with documented gram negative bacterial infection and mean APACHE II score 22) received colistin. Clinically favourable response was seen in 71% patients. However, the mortality among the study population was 27%. Univariate analysis identified pneumonia and ICU admission as independent factors for adverse outcome. Deterioration of renal function was observed in 35.89% as per RIFLE criteria. 6 (9.6%) patients demonstrated neurotoxicity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Colistin is effective in treatment of gram negative infections and its use should be reappraised. However since colistin is the last resort it is imperative to make its best use to ensure that it remains as a safe and effective mode of treatment when need be.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":31233,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejccm.2016.07.001","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes and safety of colistin in treatment of gram negative infections: A prospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"Kinnari Desai ,&nbsp;Mubin Kazi ,&nbsp;Kanchan Ajbani ,&nbsp;Mohseen Munshi ,&nbsp;Camilla Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Rajeev Soman ,&nbsp;Anjali Shetty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejccm.2016.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the fact that colistin has a significant activity against MDR gram-negative organisms, its toxicity limits its use. However, the limited therapeutic options due to increasing antibiotic resistance have made re-evaluation of older antibiotics inevitable. In contrast, lack of data to guide the usage of these drugs demands for studies on their safety and efficacy. This studies the clinical outcomes and safety of colistin at a tertiary care centre in Mumbai.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A prospective observational study was conducted at P.D. Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai for a period of seven months. Diagnosis of infection was based on CDC guidelines and APACHE II score was used to assess the severity of illness. Clinical and microbiological response to colistin was evaluated along with the incidence of nephrotoxicity (RIFLE criteria) and neurotoxicity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-two patients (median age 56<!--> <!-->years, with documented gram negative bacterial infection and mean APACHE II score 22) received colistin. Clinically favourable response was seen in 71% patients. However, the mortality among the study population was 27%. Univariate analysis identified pneumonia and ICU admission as independent factors for adverse outcome. Deterioration of renal function was observed in 35.89% as per RIFLE criteria. 6 (9.6%) patients demonstrated neurotoxicity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Colistin is effective in treatment of gram negative infections and its use should be reappraised. However since colistin is the last resort it is imperative to make its best use to ensure that it remains as a safe and effective mode of treatment when need be.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 67-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejccm.2016.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090730316300275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090730316300275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

尽管粘菌素对耐多药革兰氏阴性菌具有显著活性,但其毒性限制了其使用。然而,由于抗生素耐药性的增加,有限的治疗选择使得对旧抗生素的重新评估成为不可避免的。相比之下,缺乏数据来指导这些药物的使用,需要对其安全性和有效性进行研究。本研究的临床结果和粘菌素的安全性在孟买三级保健中心。材料和方法在孟买P.D. Hinduja医院进行了为期7个月的前瞻性观察研究。感染诊断依据CDC指南,采用APACHE II评分评估疾病严重程度。对粘菌素的临床和微生物反应以及肾毒性(RIFLE标准)和神经毒性的发生率进行了评估。结果62例患者(中位年龄56岁,革兰氏阴性细菌感染,平均APACHE II评分22)接受了粘菌素治疗。71%的患者有良好的临床反应。然而,研究人群的死亡率为27%。单因素分析发现肺炎和ICU住院是不良结果的独立因素。按照RIFLE标准,35.89%的患者出现肾功能恶化。6例(9.6%)患者表现为神经毒性。结论粘菌素是治疗革兰氏阴性感染的有效药物,应重新评价粘菌素的使用。然而,由于粘菌素是最后的手段,因此必须充分利用它,以确保在需要时它仍然是一种安全有效的治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical outcomes and safety of colistin in treatment of gram negative infections: A prospective observational study

Background

Despite the fact that colistin has a significant activity against MDR gram-negative organisms, its toxicity limits its use. However, the limited therapeutic options due to increasing antibiotic resistance have made re-evaluation of older antibiotics inevitable. In contrast, lack of data to guide the usage of these drugs demands for studies on their safety and efficacy. This studies the clinical outcomes and safety of colistin at a tertiary care centre in Mumbai.

Materials and methods

A prospective observational study was conducted at P.D. Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai for a period of seven months. Diagnosis of infection was based on CDC guidelines and APACHE II score was used to assess the severity of illness. Clinical and microbiological response to colistin was evaluated along with the incidence of nephrotoxicity (RIFLE criteria) and neurotoxicity.

Results

Sixty-two patients (median age 56 years, with documented gram negative bacterial infection and mean APACHE II score 22) received colistin. Clinically favourable response was seen in 71% patients. However, the mortality among the study population was 27%. Univariate analysis identified pneumonia and ICU admission as independent factors for adverse outcome. Deterioration of renal function was observed in 35.89% as per RIFLE criteria. 6 (9.6%) patients demonstrated neurotoxicity.

Conclusion

Colistin is effective in treatment of gram negative infections and its use should be reappraised. However since colistin is the last resort it is imperative to make its best use to ensure that it remains as a safe and effective mode of treatment when need be.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine is the official Journal of the Egyptian College of Critical Care Physicians, the most authoritative organization of Egyptian physicians involved in the multi-professional field of critical care medicine. The journal is intended to provide a peer-reviewed source for multidisciplinary coverage of general acute and intensive care medicine and its various subcategories including cardiac, pulmonary, neuro, renal as well as post-operative care. The journal is proud to have an international multi-professional editorial board in the broad field of critical care that will assist in publishing promising research and breakthrough reports that lead to better patients care in life threatening conditions, and bring the reader a quick access to the latest diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in monitoring and management of critically ill patients.
期刊最新文献
Choosing Between Enoxaparin and Fondaparinux for the Prevention of Thromboembolism: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Multiple Rib Fractures Management in a Tertiary Trauma Center: A Retrospective Observational Study Anterior Abdominal Wall Ecchymosis in COVID-19 Patient Following Enoxaparin Use Diaphragmatic Function Assessment Using Chest Ultrasonography as a Predictor for Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation Anaerobic Metabolism Markers as a Guide of Resuscitation Effort and Mortality Benefit in Septic Shock Among Egyptian Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1