{"title":"二维模型凸域波动方程Strichartz估计的新反例","authors":"Oana Ivanovici, G. Lebeau, F. Planchon","doi":"10.5802/jep.168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We prove that the range of Strichartz estimates on a model 2D convex domain may be further restricted compared to the known counterexamples due to the first author. Our new family of counterexamples is now built on the parametrix construction from our earlier work. Interestingly enough, it is sharp in at least some regions of phase space.","PeriodicalId":106406,"journal":{"name":"Journal de l’École polytechnique — Mathématiques","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New counterexamples to Strichartz estimates for the wave equation on a 2D model convex domain\",\"authors\":\"Oana Ivanovici, G. Lebeau, F. Planchon\",\"doi\":\"10.5802/jep.168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We prove that the range of Strichartz estimates on a model 2D convex domain may be further restricted compared to the known counterexamples due to the first author. Our new family of counterexamples is now built on the parametrix construction from our earlier work. Interestingly enough, it is sharp in at least some regions of phase space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal de l’École polytechnique — Mathématiques\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal de l’École polytechnique — Mathématiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5802/jep.168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal de l’École polytechnique — Mathématiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5802/jep.168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
New counterexamples to Strichartz estimates for the wave equation on a 2D model convex domain
We prove that the range of Strichartz estimates on a model 2D convex domain may be further restricted compared to the known counterexamples due to the first author. Our new family of counterexamples is now built on the parametrix construction from our earlier work. Interestingly enough, it is sharp in at least some regions of phase space.