在遗留C代码中重新设计惯用异常处理

M. Bruntink
{"title":"在遗留C代码中重新设计惯用异常处理","authors":"M. Bruntink","doi":"10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some legacy programming languages, e.g., C, do not provide adequate support for exception handling. As a result, users of these legacy programming languages often implement exception handling by applying an idiom. An idiomatic style of implementation has a number of drawbacks: applying idioms can be fault prone and requires significant effort. Modern programming languages provide support for structured exception handling (SEH) that makes idioms largely obsolete. Additionally, aspect-oriented programming (AOP) is believed to further reduce the effort of implementing exception handling. This paper investigates the gains that can be achieved by reengineering the idiomatic exception handling of a legacy C component to these modern techniques. First, we will reengineer a C component such that its exception handling idioms are almost completely replaced by SEH constructs. Second, we will show that the use of AOP for exception handling can be beneficial, even though the benefits are limited by inconsistencies in the legacy implementation.","PeriodicalId":350838,"journal":{"name":"2008 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reengineering Idiomatic Exception Handling in Legacy C Code\",\"authors\":\"M. Bruntink\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some legacy programming languages, e.g., C, do not provide adequate support for exception handling. As a result, users of these legacy programming languages often implement exception handling by applying an idiom. An idiomatic style of implementation has a number of drawbacks: applying idioms can be fault prone and requires significant effort. Modern programming languages provide support for structured exception handling (SEH) that makes idioms largely obsolete. Additionally, aspect-oriented programming (AOP) is believed to further reduce the effort of implementing exception handling. This paper investigates the gains that can be achieved by reengineering the idiomatic exception handling of a legacy C component to these modern techniques. First, we will reengineer a C component such that its exception handling idioms are almost completely replaced by SEH constructs. Second, we will show that the use of AOP for exception handling can be beneficial, even though the benefits are limited by inconsistencies in the legacy implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

一些遗留的编程语言,例如C,没有为异常处理提供足够的支持。因此,这些遗留编程语言的用户通常通过应用习惯用法来实现异常处理。习惯用法的实现风格有很多缺点:应用习惯用法容易出错,而且需要付出很大的努力。现代编程语言提供了对结构化异常处理(SEH)的支持,这使得习惯用法在很大程度上已经过时。此外,面向方面编程(AOP)被认为可以进一步减少实现异常处理的工作量。本文研究了通过将遗留C组件的惯用异常处理重新设计为这些现代技术所能获得的收益。首先,我们将重新设计一个C组件,使其异常处理习惯几乎完全被SEH结构所取代。其次,我们将展示使用AOP进行异常处理可能是有益的,尽管这些好处受到遗留实现中的不一致性的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reengineering Idiomatic Exception Handling in Legacy C Code
Some legacy programming languages, e.g., C, do not provide adequate support for exception handling. As a result, users of these legacy programming languages often implement exception handling by applying an idiom. An idiomatic style of implementation has a number of drawbacks: applying idioms can be fault prone and requires significant effort. Modern programming languages provide support for structured exception handling (SEH) that makes idioms largely obsolete. Additionally, aspect-oriented programming (AOP) is believed to further reduce the effort of implementing exception handling. This paper investigates the gains that can be achieved by reengineering the idiomatic exception handling of a legacy C component to these modern techniques. First, we will reengineer a C component such that its exception handling idioms are almost completely replaced by SEH constructs. Second, we will show that the use of AOP for exception handling can be beneficial, even though the benefits are limited by inconsistencies in the legacy implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modularity-Oriented Refactoring Quantifying Maintainability in Feature Oriented Product Lines Assessing the Support of ER and UML Class Diagrams during Maintenance Activities on Data Models A Flexible Framework to Support Collaborative Software Evolution Analysis Towards a Benchmark for Evaluating Design Pattern Miner Tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1