巴勒斯坦数学教科书和英国剑桥教科书几何内容在多大程度上满足leesh模式提出的多重表示:分析研究

Ansam Abbad
{"title":"巴勒斯坦数学教科书和英国剑桥教科书几何内容在多大程度上满足leesh模式提出的多重表示:分析研究","authors":"Ansam Abbad","doi":"10.36771/ijre.46.5.22-pp247-275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed at comparing the extent to which the geometry content of both the Palestinian Mathematics Textbooks and the British Cambridge textbooks for grades (6-8) satisfy the standards the Lesh Model of Multiple Representations. The study used the qualitative analysis approach. It employed two standard analysis instruments based on Lesh Model of representations. Each consisted of two tools; one was used to assess the part dealing with content presentation, whereas the second was used to assess the part dealing with applications. The reliability and validity of both instruments were established. The results showed that Palestinian books and British Cambridge books were not in line with the Lesh model, because their content focused on specific representations only. On the other hand, there were stronger verbal and symbolic representations, images and figures, weaker real-life representations, inefficient 3-D modeling, and weak to non-existent translation between many forms of multiple representations\n\nKeywords: Lesh Model of Multiple Representations, mathematical representations, math textbooks, Cambridge books, Palestine","PeriodicalId":368892,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal for Research in Education","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Extent to which Geometry Content in Palestinian Mathematics Textbooks and British Cambridge Textbooks Satisfy Multiple Representations as Suggested the Lesh Mode: An Analytic Study\",\"authors\":\"Ansam Abbad\",\"doi\":\"10.36771/ijre.46.5.22-pp247-275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed at comparing the extent to which the geometry content of both the Palestinian Mathematics Textbooks and the British Cambridge textbooks for grades (6-8) satisfy the standards the Lesh Model of Multiple Representations. The study used the qualitative analysis approach. It employed two standard analysis instruments based on Lesh Model of representations. Each consisted of two tools; one was used to assess the part dealing with content presentation, whereas the second was used to assess the part dealing with applications. The reliability and validity of both instruments were established. The results showed that Palestinian books and British Cambridge books were not in line with the Lesh model, because their content focused on specific representations only. On the other hand, there were stronger verbal and symbolic representations, images and figures, weaker real-life representations, inefficient 3-D modeling, and weak to non-existent translation between many forms of multiple representations\\n\\nKeywords: Lesh Model of Multiple Representations, mathematical representations, math textbooks, Cambridge books, Palestine\",\"PeriodicalId\":368892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal for Research in Education\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal for Research in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36771/ijre.46.5.22-pp247-275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal for Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36771/ijre.46.5.22-pp247-275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较巴勒斯坦数学教科书和英国剑桥6-8年级教科书的几何内容在多大程度上满足多重表示模型的标准。本研究采用定性分析方法。它采用了两种基于Lesh模型的标准分析工具。每个由两个工具组成;一个用于评估处理内容表示的部分,而第二个用于评估处理应用程序的部分。建立了两种仪器的信度和效度。结果表明,巴勒斯坦书籍和英国剑桥书籍不符合Lesh模型,因为它们的内容只关注特定的表示。另一方面,语言表征和符号表征较强,图像和数字表征较弱,现实表征较弱,三维建模效率低,多种形式的多表征之间的翻译弱至不存在。关键词:多表征的网格模型,数学表征,数学教科书,剑桥书籍,巴勒斯坦
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Extent to which Geometry Content in Palestinian Mathematics Textbooks and British Cambridge Textbooks Satisfy Multiple Representations as Suggested the Lesh Mode: An Analytic Study
This study aimed at comparing the extent to which the geometry content of both the Palestinian Mathematics Textbooks and the British Cambridge textbooks for grades (6-8) satisfy the standards the Lesh Model of Multiple Representations. The study used the qualitative analysis approach. It employed two standard analysis instruments based on Lesh Model of representations. Each consisted of two tools; one was used to assess the part dealing with content presentation, whereas the second was used to assess the part dealing with applications. The reliability and validity of both instruments were established. The results showed that Palestinian books and British Cambridge books were not in line with the Lesh model, because their content focused on specific representations only. On the other hand, there were stronger verbal and symbolic representations, images and figures, weaker real-life representations, inefficient 3-D modeling, and weak to non-existent translation between many forms of multiple representations Keywords: Lesh Model of Multiple Representations, mathematical representations, math textbooks, Cambridge books, Palestine
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sources of Mathematics Learning Disabilities for Middle School Classes from the Point of View of Supervisors and Teachers and Their Suggestions for Addressing them Brain-based Learning Principles in the Science Curricula Content of the Basic Education Stage in the Sultanate of Oman: An Analytical Study Challenges Facing Undergraduate Students with Visual Impairment during COVID-19 Outbreak at Taibah University The Extent of Implementing Evidence-based Practices in Teaching Mathematics to Students with Learning Disabilities from the Viewpoint of their Teachers Trends of Mathematics Education Research Studies Published in Journal of Mathematics Education from 2017 to 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1