当前乌克兰公共外交面临的挑战

O. Seheda
{"title":"当前乌克兰公共外交面临的挑战","authors":"O. Seheda","doi":"10.36074/11.12.2020.v5.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lack of a long-term perspective and strategy is one of the most important challenges for Ukraine’s public diplomacy at the current stage, since the strategy serves as a central axis for the formation and coordination of the activities of public diplomacy actors. Cultural and information centers at the Ukrainian embassies overseas should develop a roadmap of their activities – an annual plan for public diplomacy. Given the differing cooperation levels with each separate country of accreditation, the plan requires careful consideration of all objective factors to be useful while solving specific long-term tasks. The practice of putting an annual plan of public diplomacy has proven to be highly effective because the long-term strategy enables diplomats to optimize resources for the organizational preparation of complex projects. Shaping the image of the state in the modern age of globalization and digital domination is no longer prerogative for politicians, since the number of agents of influence are constantly increasing due to private actors, in particular, opinion leaders, influencers, etc. The general course of Ukraine’s public diplomacy is still being developed. Public diplomacy of Ukraine received the boost only in 2014, after the military intervention of the Russian Federation in Ukraine. Over the last 5 years, the focus of Ukraine's public diplomacy evolved from defending Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity into the proactive strategic planning mechanism. Despite the short history of its existence, modern Ukraine’s public diplomacy as an element of foreign policy has already demonstrated significant outcomes. To begin with, the government has launched the process of institutionalization of public diplomacy, developed common roadmaps for its implementation, and initiated the destruction of the outdated USSR norms of cultural cooperation. Besides, an attempt was made to unite the efforts of state and private actors to improve the effectiveness of public diplomacy policy. One of the major results of public diplomacy modernization has broadened the spectrum of its tools by social networks, expert diplomacy, etc. However, the lack of a specialized coordination structure, constant under-staffing, unused potential of available resources as well as budgeting problems have remained among significant challenges at the current stage of development of Ukraine’s public diplomacy. Ukrainian researcher O. Detsyk has claimed that competences and functions of state authorities that are in charge of public diplomacy are not fully differentiated and 48  Specialized and multidisciplinary scientific researches  Volume 5","PeriodicalId":191555,"journal":{"name":"SPECIALIZED AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES - Volume 5","volume":"291 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CURRENT CHALLENGES OF UKRAINE’S PUBLIC DIPLOMACY\",\"authors\":\"O. Seheda\",\"doi\":\"10.36074/11.12.2020.v5.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The lack of a long-term perspective and strategy is one of the most important challenges for Ukraine’s public diplomacy at the current stage, since the strategy serves as a central axis for the formation and coordination of the activities of public diplomacy actors. Cultural and information centers at the Ukrainian embassies overseas should develop a roadmap of their activities – an annual plan for public diplomacy. Given the differing cooperation levels with each separate country of accreditation, the plan requires careful consideration of all objective factors to be useful while solving specific long-term tasks. The practice of putting an annual plan of public diplomacy has proven to be highly effective because the long-term strategy enables diplomats to optimize resources for the organizational preparation of complex projects. Shaping the image of the state in the modern age of globalization and digital domination is no longer prerogative for politicians, since the number of agents of influence are constantly increasing due to private actors, in particular, opinion leaders, influencers, etc. The general course of Ukraine’s public diplomacy is still being developed. Public diplomacy of Ukraine received the boost only in 2014, after the military intervention of the Russian Federation in Ukraine. Over the last 5 years, the focus of Ukraine's public diplomacy evolved from defending Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity into the proactive strategic planning mechanism. Despite the short history of its existence, modern Ukraine’s public diplomacy as an element of foreign policy has already demonstrated significant outcomes. To begin with, the government has launched the process of institutionalization of public diplomacy, developed common roadmaps for its implementation, and initiated the destruction of the outdated USSR norms of cultural cooperation. Besides, an attempt was made to unite the efforts of state and private actors to improve the effectiveness of public diplomacy policy. One of the major results of public diplomacy modernization has broadened the spectrum of its tools by social networks, expert diplomacy, etc. However, the lack of a specialized coordination structure, constant under-staffing, unused potential of available resources as well as budgeting problems have remained among significant challenges at the current stage of development of Ukraine’s public diplomacy. Ukrainian researcher O. Detsyk has claimed that competences and functions of state authorities that are in charge of public diplomacy are not fully differentiated and 48  Specialized and multidisciplinary scientific researches  Volume 5\",\"PeriodicalId\":191555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPECIALIZED AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES - Volume 5\",\"volume\":\"291 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPECIALIZED AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES - Volume 5\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36074/11.12.2020.v5.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPECIALIZED AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES - Volume 5","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36074/11.12.2020.v5.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

缺乏长期的观点和战略是现阶段乌克兰公共外交面临的最重要挑战之一,因为该战略是公共外交行动者形成和协调活动的中轴线。乌克兰驻外使馆的文化和信息中心应制定其活动路线图,即公共外交的年度计划。鉴于与每一个单独的认可国的合作水平不同,该计划需要在解决具体的长期任务时仔细考虑所有客观因素。制定公共外交年度计划的做法被证明是非常有效的,因为长期战略使外交官能够优化资源,以便组织准备复杂的项目。在全球化和数字统治的现代时代,塑造国家形象不再是政治家的特权,因为由于私人行为者,特别是意见领袖、影响者等,影响力代理人的数量不断增加。乌克兰公共外交的总体路线仍在发展中。乌克兰的公共外交直到2014年俄罗斯联邦对乌克兰进行军事干预后才得到提振。近5年来,乌克兰公共外交的重心从捍卫乌克兰主权和领土完整演变为积极主动的战略规划机制。尽管存在的历史很短,现代乌克兰的公共外交作为外交政策的一个组成部分已经显示出显著的成果。首先,政府启动了公共外交制度化的进程,制定了实施公共外交的共同路线图,并开始摧毁过时的苏联文化合作准则。此外,还试图将国家和私人行为体的努力结合起来,以提高公共外交政策的有效性。公共外交现代化的主要成果之一是通过社会网络、专家外交等拓宽了公共外交工具的范围。然而,在乌克兰公共外交发展的当前阶段,缺乏专门的协调结构、人员经常不足、现有资源的潜力未得到利用以及预算问题仍然是重大挑战。乌克兰研究员O. Detsyk声称,负责公共外交的国家当局的权限和职能没有完全区分,48 .专门和多学科的科学研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CURRENT CHALLENGES OF UKRAINE’S PUBLIC DIPLOMACY
The lack of a long-term perspective and strategy is one of the most important challenges for Ukraine’s public diplomacy at the current stage, since the strategy serves as a central axis for the formation and coordination of the activities of public diplomacy actors. Cultural and information centers at the Ukrainian embassies overseas should develop a roadmap of their activities – an annual plan for public diplomacy. Given the differing cooperation levels with each separate country of accreditation, the plan requires careful consideration of all objective factors to be useful while solving specific long-term tasks. The practice of putting an annual plan of public diplomacy has proven to be highly effective because the long-term strategy enables diplomats to optimize resources for the organizational preparation of complex projects. Shaping the image of the state in the modern age of globalization and digital domination is no longer prerogative for politicians, since the number of agents of influence are constantly increasing due to private actors, in particular, opinion leaders, influencers, etc. The general course of Ukraine’s public diplomacy is still being developed. Public diplomacy of Ukraine received the boost only in 2014, after the military intervention of the Russian Federation in Ukraine. Over the last 5 years, the focus of Ukraine's public diplomacy evolved from defending Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity into the proactive strategic planning mechanism. Despite the short history of its existence, modern Ukraine’s public diplomacy as an element of foreign policy has already demonstrated significant outcomes. To begin with, the government has launched the process of institutionalization of public diplomacy, developed common roadmaps for its implementation, and initiated the destruction of the outdated USSR norms of cultural cooperation. Besides, an attempt was made to unite the efforts of state and private actors to improve the effectiveness of public diplomacy policy. One of the major results of public diplomacy modernization has broadened the spectrum of its tools by social networks, expert diplomacy, etc. However, the lack of a specialized coordination structure, constant under-staffing, unused potential of available resources as well as budgeting problems have remained among significant challenges at the current stage of development of Ukraine’s public diplomacy. Ukrainian researcher O. Detsyk has claimed that competences and functions of state authorities that are in charge of public diplomacy are not fully differentiated and 48  Specialized and multidisciplinary scientific researches  Volume 5
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ЕВОЛЮЦІЯ КОНЦЕПЦІЇ ЗАБОРОНИ ДИСКРИМІНАЦІЇ ТА ЇЇ МІЖНАРОДНЕ ЗАКОНОДАВЧЕ ЗАКРІПЛЕННЯ CURRENT CHALLENGES OF UKRAINE’S PUBLIC DIPLOMACY FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED CRIME ПРАВОВІ ПИТАННЯ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ДЕРЖАВНО-ПРИВАТНОГО ПАРТНЕРСТВА В ПРОЦЕСІ ЦИФРОВІЗАЦІЇ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1