碎屑锆石定年对晚更新世里奥格兰德-里奥查马河系的新认识

M. Repasch, K. Karlstrom, M. Heizler, D. Koning
{"title":"碎屑锆石定年对晚更新世里奥格兰德-里奥查马河系的新认识","authors":"M. Repasch, K. Karlstrom, M. Heizler, D. Koning","doi":"10.56577/ffc-.479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detrital zircon analysis has excellent potential to elucidate the evolution of the Rio Grande‒Rio Chama fluvial system by characterizing the provenance of sediment and assessing fluvial connectivity of Rio Grande rift basins through time. This study uses U-Pb geochronology of detrital zircon separated from modern river sediment, terrace deposits with the Lava Creek B ash (640 ka), and three intermediate terraces to reconstruct the provenance of sediment carried by the Rio Grande‒Rio Chama fluvial system over the last 640 ka. U-Pb detrital zircon ages for Red River sediment are further supported by high precision 40Ar/39Ar detrital sanidine dating, which has the ability to identify age populations that are not resolved by lower precision detrital zircon dates. The detrital zircon age spectra of a 640 ka Rio Grande terrace in the Albuquerque Basin and a 640 ka Rio Chama terrace show a number of diagnostic age peaks: 1) 23-25 Ma characteristic of the Latir Volcanic Field, 2) 27-28 Ma that could be either from the Latir or San Juan Volcanic Fields, 3) 34-35 Ma characteristic of the San Juan Volcanic Field, 4) Cretaceous-aged peaks, and 5) a “triple peak” consisting of 1.7, 1.4, and 1.1 Ga zircon derived from Precambrian basement, which is common in Phanerozoic sediments throughout the western U.S. Based on two samples, we interpret relatively abundant 28-36 Ma zircon in river sediment to be characteristic of the Rio Chama. These similarities are compatible with models showing that the Rio Chama – with San Juan Mountain headwaters – dominated the river system at 640 ka. Similar 28-35 Ma zircon in a 250˗350 ka Rio Grande terrace in the Española Basin is compatible with models positing a San Juan Mountain source of detritus for the Rio Grande after spillover of Lake Alamosa ~430 ka, and with reworking of Santa Fe Group sediment. The 27-28 Ma temporal overlap between the San Juan and Latir Volcanic Fields is problematic for provenance, but modern river sand samples suggest it is possible to distinguish the 28 Ma San Juan Volcanic Field (Fish Canyon Tuff) zircon peak from the 22-27 Ma Latir Volcanic Field zircon peak. Although the Latir Volcanic Field has a 28.2 Ma tuff (Tetilla Peak Tuff), its associated zircon is much less abundant than younger zircon (e.g., the 25.49 Ma Amalia Tuff). The similar pattern of age peaks between 640 ka fluvial sediment in the Albuquerque Basin and the Rio Chama indicates that the Rio Chama dominated the river system at 640 ka. Preliminary detrital sanidine data for Red River sediment that was derived from the Latir Volcanic Field show that 23-25 Ma sanidine is twice as abundant as 27-29 Ma sanidine, and therefore abundant 27-29 Ma zircon in the Rio Grande system is interpreted to indicate fluvial connectivity to the San Juan Mountains. 479","PeriodicalId":243410,"journal":{"name":"Guidebook 67 - Geology of the Belen Area","volume":"48 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New insights on the late Pleistocene Rio Grande-Rio Chama fluvial system from detrital zircon dating\",\"authors\":\"M. Repasch, K. Karlstrom, M. Heizler, D. Koning\",\"doi\":\"10.56577/ffc-.479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Detrital zircon analysis has excellent potential to elucidate the evolution of the Rio Grande‒Rio Chama fluvial system by characterizing the provenance of sediment and assessing fluvial connectivity of Rio Grande rift basins through time. This study uses U-Pb geochronology of detrital zircon separated from modern river sediment, terrace deposits with the Lava Creek B ash (640 ka), and three intermediate terraces to reconstruct the provenance of sediment carried by the Rio Grande‒Rio Chama fluvial system over the last 640 ka. U-Pb detrital zircon ages for Red River sediment are further supported by high precision 40Ar/39Ar detrital sanidine dating, which has the ability to identify age populations that are not resolved by lower precision detrital zircon dates. The detrital zircon age spectra of a 640 ka Rio Grande terrace in the Albuquerque Basin and a 640 ka Rio Chama terrace show a number of diagnostic age peaks: 1) 23-25 Ma characteristic of the Latir Volcanic Field, 2) 27-28 Ma that could be either from the Latir or San Juan Volcanic Fields, 3) 34-35 Ma characteristic of the San Juan Volcanic Field, 4) Cretaceous-aged peaks, and 5) a “triple peak” consisting of 1.7, 1.4, and 1.1 Ga zircon derived from Precambrian basement, which is common in Phanerozoic sediments throughout the western U.S. Based on two samples, we interpret relatively abundant 28-36 Ma zircon in river sediment to be characteristic of the Rio Chama. These similarities are compatible with models showing that the Rio Chama – with San Juan Mountain headwaters – dominated the river system at 640 ka. Similar 28-35 Ma zircon in a 250˗350 ka Rio Grande terrace in the Española Basin is compatible with models positing a San Juan Mountain source of detritus for the Rio Grande after spillover of Lake Alamosa ~430 ka, and with reworking of Santa Fe Group sediment. The 27-28 Ma temporal overlap between the San Juan and Latir Volcanic Fields is problematic for provenance, but modern river sand samples suggest it is possible to distinguish the 28 Ma San Juan Volcanic Field (Fish Canyon Tuff) zircon peak from the 22-27 Ma Latir Volcanic Field zircon peak. Although the Latir Volcanic Field has a 28.2 Ma tuff (Tetilla Peak Tuff), its associated zircon is much less abundant than younger zircon (e.g., the 25.49 Ma Amalia Tuff). The similar pattern of age peaks between 640 ka fluvial sediment in the Albuquerque Basin and the Rio Chama indicates that the Rio Chama dominated the river system at 640 ka. Preliminary detrital sanidine data for Red River sediment that was derived from the Latir Volcanic Field show that 23-25 Ma sanidine is twice as abundant as 27-29 Ma sanidine, and therefore abundant 27-29 Ma zircon in the Rio Grande system is interpreted to indicate fluvial connectivity to the San Juan Mountains. 479\",\"PeriodicalId\":243410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Guidebook 67 - Geology of the Belen Area\",\"volume\":\"48 7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Guidebook 67 - Geology of the Belen Area\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56577/ffc-.479\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Guidebook 67 - Geology of the Belen Area","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56577/ffc-.479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碎屑锆石分析通过表征沉积物的物源和评估里奥格兰德裂谷盆地的河流连通性,在阐明里奥格兰德-里奥查马河系的演化过程中具有良好的潜力。本研究利用从现代河流沉积物中分离出的碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学、含熔岩溪B火山灰的阶地沉积物(640 ka)和三个中间阶地重建了过去640 ka里奥格兰德河-里奥查马河河流系统携带的沉积物的物源。红河沉积物的U-Pb碎屑锆石年龄进一步得到了高精度40Ar/39Ar碎屑锆石定年的支持,该定年能够识别低精度碎屑锆石定年无法分辨的年龄群。阿尔伯克基盆地640 ka里奥格兰德阶地和640 ka里奥查马阶地的碎屑锆石年龄谱显示出许多诊断年龄峰:1)拉蒂尔火山场的23-25 Ma特征,2)拉蒂尔火山场或圣胡安火山场的27-28 Ma特征,3)圣胡安火山场的34-35 Ma特征,4)白垩纪时代的峰值,5)由来自前寒武纪基底的1.7、1.4和1.1 Ga锆石组成的“三峰”,这在美国西部显生宙沉积物中很常见。我们认为河流沉积物中相对丰富的28-36 Ma锆石是里约查马的特征。这些相似之处与模型相符,模型显示,在640 ka时,以圣胡安山为源头的里约查马河主导了河流系统。Española盆地250—350 ka的Rio Grande台地中相似的28—35 Ma锆石,与Alamosa湖溢出~430 ka后Rio Grande碎屑源为圣胡安山的模型和Santa Fe群沉积物的改造模型相吻合。27 ~ 28 Ma圣胡安火山田与拉蒂尔火山田的时间重叠对物源的确定存在问题,但现代河砂样品表明,可以将28 Ma圣胡安火山田(鱼峡谷凝灰岩)的锆石峰与22 ~ 27 Ma拉蒂尔火山田的锆石峰区分开。虽然拉蒂尔火山田有28.2 Ma的凝灰岩(Tetilla Peak tuff),但其伴生的锆石远不如年轻的锆石(如25.49 Ma的Amalia凝灰岩)丰富。阿尔伯克基盆地640 ka河流沉积物与里奥查马河的年龄峰相似,表明里奥查马河在640 ka时占主导地位。来自拉蒂尔火山场的红河沉积物的初步碎屑砂质数据表明,23-25 Ma砂质含量是27-29 Ma砂质含量的两倍,因此在里奥格兰德体系中丰富的27-29 Ma锆石被解释为表明河流与圣胡安山脉的连系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New insights on the late Pleistocene Rio Grande-Rio Chama fluvial system from detrital zircon dating
Detrital zircon analysis has excellent potential to elucidate the evolution of the Rio Grande‒Rio Chama fluvial system by characterizing the provenance of sediment and assessing fluvial connectivity of Rio Grande rift basins through time. This study uses U-Pb geochronology of detrital zircon separated from modern river sediment, terrace deposits with the Lava Creek B ash (640 ka), and three intermediate terraces to reconstruct the provenance of sediment carried by the Rio Grande‒Rio Chama fluvial system over the last 640 ka. U-Pb detrital zircon ages for Red River sediment are further supported by high precision 40Ar/39Ar detrital sanidine dating, which has the ability to identify age populations that are not resolved by lower precision detrital zircon dates. The detrital zircon age spectra of a 640 ka Rio Grande terrace in the Albuquerque Basin and a 640 ka Rio Chama terrace show a number of diagnostic age peaks: 1) 23-25 Ma characteristic of the Latir Volcanic Field, 2) 27-28 Ma that could be either from the Latir or San Juan Volcanic Fields, 3) 34-35 Ma characteristic of the San Juan Volcanic Field, 4) Cretaceous-aged peaks, and 5) a “triple peak” consisting of 1.7, 1.4, and 1.1 Ga zircon derived from Precambrian basement, which is common in Phanerozoic sediments throughout the western U.S. Based on two samples, we interpret relatively abundant 28-36 Ma zircon in river sediment to be characteristic of the Rio Chama. These similarities are compatible with models showing that the Rio Chama – with San Juan Mountain headwaters – dominated the river system at 640 ka. Similar 28-35 Ma zircon in a 250˗350 ka Rio Grande terrace in the Española Basin is compatible with models positing a San Juan Mountain source of detritus for the Rio Grande after spillover of Lake Alamosa ~430 ka, and with reworking of Santa Fe Group sediment. The 27-28 Ma temporal overlap between the San Juan and Latir Volcanic Fields is problematic for provenance, but modern river sand samples suggest it is possible to distinguish the 28 Ma San Juan Volcanic Field (Fish Canyon Tuff) zircon peak from the 22-27 Ma Latir Volcanic Field zircon peak. Although the Latir Volcanic Field has a 28.2 Ma tuff (Tetilla Peak Tuff), its associated zircon is much less abundant than younger zircon (e.g., the 25.49 Ma Amalia Tuff). The similar pattern of age peaks between 640 ka fluvial sediment in the Albuquerque Basin and the Rio Chama indicates that the Rio Chama dominated the river system at 640 ka. Preliminary detrital sanidine data for Red River sediment that was derived from the Latir Volcanic Field show that 23-25 Ma sanidine is twice as abundant as 27-29 Ma sanidine, and therefore abundant 27-29 Ma zircon in the Rio Grande system is interpreted to indicate fluvial connectivity to the San Juan Mountains. 479
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Carrizo Arroyo, central New Mexico - a new late Palaeozoic taphotype of arthropod Fossillagerst�tte Architecture of buried bluff lines: A record of the incising ancestral Rio Grande and Abo Arroyo from the Pleistocene to historical times Day 1 road log: The Rio Grande Rift, the southern Albuquerque Basin and the southern Manzano Mountains Grants obsidian in the Ceja formation beneath the Llano de Albuquerque south of Belen Proterozoic magmatism and regional contact metamorphism in the Sandia-Manzano Mountains, New Mexico, USA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1