澳大利亚商品及服务税中增值税的基本概念:“供考虑”的含义

R. Millar
{"title":"澳大利亚商品及服务税中增值税的基本概念:“供考虑”的含义","authors":"R. Millar","doi":"10.5235/20488432.3.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quintessentially eccentric style in which the Australian GST is drafted has led the High Court of Australia to suggest that Australia's GST differs from other value added taxes in respect of the basic concept of a ‘supply for consideration’. This article examines the five most significant Australian cases on this concept, which deal with cancelled transactions, subsidies, and business incentive payments. A detailed analysis of these cases reveals that the issues that arise and the arguments made in respect of those issues—though not always the conclusions reached—are hardly unusual in the context of a VAT, and it remains unclear just how different the Australian GST really is.","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grappling with basic VAT concepts in the Australian GST: the meaning of ‘supply for consideration’\",\"authors\":\"R. Millar\",\"doi\":\"10.5235/20488432.3.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The quintessentially eccentric style in which the Australian GST is drafted has led the High Court of Australia to suggest that Australia's GST differs from other value added taxes in respect of the basic concept of a ‘supply for consideration’. This article examines the five most significant Australian cases on this concept, which deal with cancelled transactions, subsidies, and business incentive payments. A detailed analysis of these cases reveals that the issues that arise and the arguments made in respect of those issues—though not always the conclusions reached—are hardly unusual in the context of a VAT, and it remains unclear just how different the Australian GST really is.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.3.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.3.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚商品及服务税起草的典型古怪风格导致澳大利亚高等法院认为,澳大利亚的商品及服务税在“供考虑”的基本概念方面不同于其他增值税。本文考察了有关这一概念的五个最重要的澳大利亚案例,它们涉及取消交易、补贴和商业激励支付。对这些案例的详细分析表明,出现的问题和关于这些问题的争论——尽管并不总是得出结论——在增值税的背景下几乎是不寻常的,而且目前还不清楚澳大利亚的商品及服务税到底有多不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Grappling with basic VAT concepts in the Australian GST: the meaning of ‘supply for consideration’
The quintessentially eccentric style in which the Australian GST is drafted has led the High Court of Australia to suggest that Australia's GST differs from other value added taxes in respect of the basic concept of a ‘supply for consideration’. This article examines the five most significant Australian cases on this concept, which deal with cancelled transactions, subsidies, and business incentive payments. A detailed analysis of these cases reveals that the issues that arise and the arguments made in respect of those issues—though not always the conclusions reached—are hardly unusual in the context of a VAT, and it remains unclear just how different the Australian GST really is.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Equality under State aid rules and VAT The direct and immediate link with specialised services contracts as a measure for the right to deduct input VAT and the uncertainty in European tax law VAT deduction and member state sovereignty: (still) a good idea? EU VAT at the dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution* VAT information asymmetries in the context of intra-EU trade in goods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1