不知情投资者在最优IPO机制中的作用,或者谷歌做对了什么,Facebook做错了什么

A. Malakhov
{"title":"不知情投资者在最优IPO机制中的作用,或者谷歌做对了什么,Facebook做错了什么","authors":"A. Malakhov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.687167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores optimal ways for a firm to sell its initial public offering (IPO) to a mix of informed and uninformed investors through an intermediary. I argue that uninformed investors provide a benchmark for informed investors, resulting in an endogenous constraint that affects the issuer’s revenue. I conclude that higher revenues are achieved with higher numbers of uninformed investors participating in an IPO. Furthermore, the intermediary serves as the only credible provider of information about uninformed investors’ realized demand to informed investors. This increases the issuer’s expected revenue, and provides a rationale for substantial payments to the intermediary. JEL Classification: G24","PeriodicalId":447775,"journal":{"name":"Capital Markets: Market Microstructure","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Uninformed Investors in an Optimal IPO Mechanism, or What Google Did Right and Facebook Did Wrong\",\"authors\":\"A. Malakhov\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.687167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores optimal ways for a firm to sell its initial public offering (IPO) to a mix of informed and uninformed investors through an intermediary. I argue that uninformed investors provide a benchmark for informed investors, resulting in an endogenous constraint that affects the issuer’s revenue. I conclude that higher revenues are achieved with higher numbers of uninformed investors participating in an IPO. Furthermore, the intermediary serves as the only credible provider of information about uninformed investors’ realized demand to informed investors. This increases the issuer’s expected revenue, and provides a rationale for substantial payments to the intermediary. JEL Classification: G24\",\"PeriodicalId\":447775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Capital Markets: Market Microstructure\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Capital Markets: Market Microstructure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.687167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital Markets: Market Microstructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.687167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文探讨了公司通过中介向知情和不知情的投资者出售其首次公开募股(IPO)的最佳方式。我认为,不知情的投资者为知情的投资者提供了一个基准,从而产生了一种影响发行人收入的内生约束。我的结论是,有更多不知情的投资者参与IPO,就能获得更高的收益。此外,中介机构是向知情投资者提供未知情投资者已实现需求信息的唯一可靠提供者。这增加了发行人的预期收入,并为向中介机构支付大笔款项提供了理由。JEL分类:G24
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Role of Uninformed Investors in an Optimal IPO Mechanism, or What Google Did Right and Facebook Did Wrong
This paper explores optimal ways for a firm to sell its initial public offering (IPO) to a mix of informed and uninformed investors through an intermediary. I argue that uninformed investors provide a benchmark for informed investors, resulting in an endogenous constraint that affects the issuer’s revenue. I conclude that higher revenues are achieved with higher numbers of uninformed investors participating in an IPO. Furthermore, the intermediary serves as the only credible provider of information about uninformed investors’ realized demand to informed investors. This increases the issuer’s expected revenue, and provides a rationale for substantial payments to the intermediary. JEL Classification: G24
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Liquidity Preferences of Mutual Funds Mind the Gap: Disentangling Credit and Liquidity in Risk Spreads Skewness and the Asymmetry in Earnings Announcement Returns The Role of Uninformed Investors in an Optimal IPO Mechanism, or What Google Did Right and Facebook Did Wrong The Impact of Competition and Information on Intraday Trading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1