{"title":"卫星图像中深度学习目标检测模型的比较","authors":"A. Groener, Gary Chern, M. D. Pritt","doi":"10.1109/AIPR47015.2019.9174593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we compare the detection accuracy and speed of several state-of-the-art models for the task of detecting oil and gas fracking wells and small cars in commercial electrooptical satellite imagery. Several models are studied from the single-stage, two-stage, and multi-stage object detection families of techniques. For the detection of fracking well pads (50m- 250m), we find single-stage detectors provide superior prediction speed while also matching detection performance of their two and multi-stage counterparts. However, for detecting small cars, two-stage and multi-stage models provide substantially higher accuracies at the cost of some speed. We also measure timing results of the sliding window object detection algorithm to provide a baseline for comparison. Some of these models have been incorporated into the Lockheed Martin Globally-Scalable Automated Target Recognition (GATR) framework.","PeriodicalId":167075,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR)","volume":"327 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Deep Learning Object Detection Models for Satellite Imagery\",\"authors\":\"A. Groener, Gary Chern, M. D. Pritt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AIPR47015.2019.9174593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work, we compare the detection accuracy and speed of several state-of-the-art models for the task of detecting oil and gas fracking wells and small cars in commercial electrooptical satellite imagery. Several models are studied from the single-stage, two-stage, and multi-stage object detection families of techniques. For the detection of fracking well pads (50m- 250m), we find single-stage detectors provide superior prediction speed while also matching detection performance of their two and multi-stage counterparts. However, for detecting small cars, two-stage and multi-stage models provide substantially higher accuracies at the cost of some speed. We also measure timing results of the sliding window object detection algorithm to provide a baseline for comparison. Some of these models have been incorporated into the Lockheed Martin Globally-Scalable Automated Target Recognition (GATR) framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR)\",\"volume\":\"327 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIPR47015.2019.9174593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIPR47015.2019.9174593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparison of Deep Learning Object Detection Models for Satellite Imagery
In this work, we compare the detection accuracy and speed of several state-of-the-art models for the task of detecting oil and gas fracking wells and small cars in commercial electrooptical satellite imagery. Several models are studied from the single-stage, two-stage, and multi-stage object detection families of techniques. For the detection of fracking well pads (50m- 250m), we find single-stage detectors provide superior prediction speed while also matching detection performance of their two and multi-stage counterparts. However, for detecting small cars, two-stage and multi-stage models provide substantially higher accuracies at the cost of some speed. We also measure timing results of the sliding window object detection algorithm to provide a baseline for comparison. Some of these models have been incorporated into the Lockheed Martin Globally-Scalable Automated Target Recognition (GATR) framework.